The goal of this work is to study the effect of crude oil on worm-like micelles and identify any oil-tolerant systems. A new class of nonionic surfactants was synthesized that forms viscous worm-like micelles under a wide range of temperature and salinity conditions. Aqueous stability, rheology, cryogenic transmission electron microscopy imaging, and dynamic-light-scattering measurements were performed to understand properties, shape, and size of the micelles formed using these surfactants under different temperatures and salinity conditions and in the presence of hydrocarbons. These micellar solutions maintained high viscosity in the presence of small amounts (up to 8 vol %) of crude oils and pure hydrocarbons. Similar experiments were performed with conventional surfactant systems that were known to form worm-like micelles; they did not show oil tolerance. Larger alkanes and viscous crude oils affect the viscosity and transformation of cylindrical micelles less. These new surfactants are useful for oil and gas operations such as hydraulic fracturing, conformance control, and mobility control as they form viscous worm-like micelles in the presence of small amounts of crude oils.
The goal of this work is to study the effect of crude oil on worm-like micelles and identify any oil-tolerant systems. A new class of nonionic surfactants was synthesized that forms viscous worm-like micelles under a wide range of temperature and salinity conditions. Aqueous stability, rheology, cryogenic transmission electron microscopy imaging, and dynamic-light-scattering measurements were performed to understand properties, shape, and size of the micelles formed using these surfactants under different temperatures and salinity conditions and in the presence of hydrocarbons. These micellar solutions maintained high viscosity in the presence of small amounts (up to 8 vol %) of crude oils and pure hydrocarbons. Similar experiments were performed with conventional surfactant systems that were known to form worm-like micelles; they did not show oil tolerance. Larger alkanes and viscous crude oils affect the viscosity and transformation of cylindrical micelles less. These new surfactants are useful for oil and gas operations such as hydraulic fracturing, conformance control, and mobility control as they form viscous worm-like micelles in the presence of small amounts of crude oils.
Surfactants have the ability
to self-assemble in aqueous solutions to form microstructures, such
as spherical micelles, cylindrical micelles, vesicles, and others.[1,2] Cylindrical (or worm-like or rod-like) micelles form in many aqueous
surfactant systems, with or without the presence of salt,[3−10] when the surfactant packing parameter, Ns [= v/(l × a0)],
is between 0.33 and 0.5, where v is the volume of the hydrophobic
portion of the surfactant, l is the length of the hydrophobic chain,
and a0 is the effective area of the head group.[2] Cylindrical micellar solutions are often viscous
because of entanglement between micelles, while spherical micellar
solutions are not viscous. Cylindrical micellar solutions are also
viscoelastic; their nonlinear rheology from dilute to concentrated
solutions has been reviewed by Lerouge and Berrett.[11] The dilute solutions exhibit shear thickening because of
shear-induced structures. The semidilute and concentrated phases undergo
shear-banding transitions. The concentrated nematic phases of micelles
exhibit a tumbling instability. In this work, we study semidilute
(0.1–5 wt %) solutions of surfactants.Cationic surfactants,
in particular, have been extensively studied for worm-like micelles
in the presence of high concentration of salts.[12−16] Worm-like micelles have also been reported for mixtures
of cationic/anionic, nonionic/ionic, and zwitterionic surfactants.[17−23] Although most studies on worm-like micelles have been reported for
charged surfactant systems, a few nonionic surfactants in the presence
of a co-surfactant have also been reported.[24,25] Naito et al.[26] reported the formation
of viscoelastic worm-like micelles in the presence of long-chain nonionic
surfactant mixture (polyoxyethylene phytosterols: mixtures of PhyEO10
and PhyEO20). Sharma et al.[27] studied a
long polyoxyethylene chain of phytosterol (PhyEO30) in the presence
of short-chain polyoxyethylene alkyl ether type of surfactants. Many
studies have reported worm-like micelles of di- and triblock copolymers.
Chaibundit et al.[28] reported micellization
of diblock copolymers and transition to worm-like micelles. Schillén
et al.[29] reported PEO-PPO-PEO triblock
copolymers to form worm-like micelles.Worm-like micelles can
be responsive to many stimuli, such as light,[30,31] temperature,[32−34] pH,[35−38] and CO2.[39] These stimuli help
to change other types of micelles to worm-like micelles. On the contrary,
the presence of hydrocarbon is a stimulus that breaks viscous worm-like
micelles and converts them to nonviscous spherical micelles.[40−42] A few studies have investigated the effect of hydrocarbons on worm-like
micelles and found that the type of hydrocarbon plays an important
role. Aromatic hydrocarbons solubilize in the palisade layer (the
outer shell of the micelles consisting of ethoxy (EO) groups in nonionic
surfactants) and do not break worm-like micelles unless the outer
layer is completely saturated, whereas aliphatic hydrocarbons penetrate
into and swell the micellar core (inner hydrophobic core) and break
down worm-like micelles to spherical micelles.[43] Törnblom and Henriksson[44] reported growth of micellar size in the presence of cycloalkanes
and benzene while decrease in aggregate size with n-alkanes. Shibaev et al.[41] studied transition
of worm-like micelles on adding hydrocarbons and found that both shortening
of worm-like micelles and transition to spherical micelles occur on
adding hydrocarbon. Reverse worm-like micelles[46−49] are compatible with hydrocarbons,
but they are not miscible or soluble in water. Studies reported above
investigated the effect of hydrocarbon on worm-like micelles formed
using cationic or anionic surfactants.[45] In this study, we report the effect of hydrocarbon on worm-like
micelles of a nonionic surfactant.Worm-like micelles of surfactants
have attracted a considerable interest in various fields including
oil and gas[10,11] because their rheological property
can be helpful in hydraulic fracturing, drilling, and surfactant flooding
processes. As surfactant molecules are small and micelles can break
and reform, these surfactants may be injected into tight rocks without
causing any plugging. These worm-like micelles can be used in viscosity
drilling and hydraulic fracturing fluids which can transform into
less-viscous fluids (with spherical micelles) during oil production.
Cleaning operations after fracturing (or drilling) with viscous worm-like
micellar solutions are easier than with polymeric viscous solutions.
Because the temperature and salinity in oil and gas reservoirs vary
in a wide range, surfactant molecules are needed that can form viscous
worm-like micelles under these diverse reservoir conditions.Compatibility of worm-like micellar solution with crude oil is an
important property for applications in oil reservoirs. Most surfactants
have long hydrocarbon chains, and these chains interact with crude
oils changing the cylindrical micelles to spherical swollen micelles
in the presence of oils. We have synthesized a new class of surfactants
where the hydrocarbon chain has been replaced by a propoxy (PO) chain,
and we anticipate the interaction between the oil and PO chain to
be lower than that with hydrocarbon chains. The motivation of this
work is to study the effect of this surfactant structural change on
worm-like micellar behavior of the surfactant solutions.In
this study, a new class of surfactants was synthesized and investigated
under various temperatures (20–125 °C) and salinity conditions
(up to 250,000 ppm TDS). Aqueous stability, rheology, cryogenic transmission
electron microscopy (CryoTEM) imaging, and dynamic-light-scattering
measurements were performed to understand properties, shape, and size
of the micelles formed using these surfactants under different temperatures
and salinity conditions. Crude oils and other hydrocarbons were mixed
with the aqueous surfactant solutions, and the effect of oil was studied.
The properties of these nonionic surfactants were compared with those
of a few conventional surfactants that form worm-like micelles.
Results and Discussion
Phase Behavior
The aqueous stability of 2 wt % CH3–O–70PO–100EOH
is shown in Figure a as a function of salinity and temperature. The mixtures are labeled
“C” for clear solutions, “H” for hazy,
and “P” for those with precipitations. A solution was
called “aqueous stable” if it was clear or hazy. Surfactant
solutions were clear at 25 °C and at 40 °C for 9 wt % salinity
and lower. These solutions were hazy at 20–25 wt % salinity.
At 65 °C, the solutions containing up to 4 wt % NaCl were clear
and the solutions containing 5–8 wt % NaCl were hazy. Similarly,
solutions with 20–25 wt % NaCl had precipitations. As the temperature
increased to 90 °C, solutions were hazy up to 2% NaCl and the
higher salinity solutions had precipitations, as shown in Figure b. At 125 °C,
all the surfactant solutions had precipitations.
Figure 1
(a)Aqueous phase behavior
of the 2 wt % CH3O–70PO–100EOH surfactant
with temperature and salinity. Experimental data points are shown
in blue; the lines are interpolations from the experiments. The symbol
C represents clear, H represents hazy, and P represents precipitation.
(b) Appearance of 2 wt % CH3–O–70PO–100EOH
surfactant solutions in the presence of 0–9 wt % NaCl (from
left to right) at 90 °C. (c) Aqueous phase behavior of the 2
wt % CH3O–70PO–75EOH surfactant with temperature
and salinity. Experimental data points are shown in blue; the lines
are interpolations from the experiments. The symbol C represents clear,
H represents hazy, and P represents precipitation. (d) Aqueous phase
behavior of the 2 wt % CH3O–70PO–120EOH surfactant
with temperature and salinity. Experimental data points are shown
in blue; the lines are interpolations from the experiments. The symbol
C represents clear and P represents precipitation.
(a)Aqueous phase behavior
of the 2 wt % CH3O–70PO–100EOH surfactant
with temperature and salinity. Experimental data points are shown
in blue; the lines are interpolations from the experiments. The symbol
C represents clear, H represents hazy, and P represents precipitation.
(b) Appearance of 2 wt % CH3–O–70PO–100EOH
surfactant solutions in the presence of 0–9 wt % NaCl (from
left to right) at 90 °C. (c) Aqueous phase behavior of the 2
wt % CH3O–70PO–75EOH surfactant with temperature
and salinity. Experimental data points are shown in blue; the lines
are interpolations from the experiments. The symbol C represents clear,
H represents hazy, and P represents precipitation. (d) Aqueous phase
behavior of the 2 wt % CH3O–70PO–120EOH surfactant
with temperature and salinity. Experimental data points are shown
in blue; the lines are interpolations from the experiments. The symbol
C represents clear and P represents precipitation.As the salinity and temperature increase, the surfactant
solutions change from clear to hazy to precipitation, as shown in Figure a. The clear solutions
had a viscosity similar to water. The hazy solutions were viscous;
the viscosity is discussed in the next section. As is demonstrated
in the later sections, the clear solutions correspond to spherical
micelles and the hazy solutions indicate cylindrical “worm-like”
micelles.Other surfactants in the homologous series (constant
PO numbers with variable EO numbers and vice versa) were also studied.
CH3–O–70PO-nEO compounds
containing the following number of EO groups were synthesized: 60EO,
75EO, 120EO, and 150EO. In addition, the CH3O–80PO–100EOH
surfactant was also synthesized. The aqueous stability results of
CH3O–70PO–75EOH and CH3O–70PO–120EOH
surfactant are presented in Figure c,d, respectively. The results show that the CH3–O–70PO–75EOH surfactant also forms clear,
hazy, and precipitated phases. As salinity and temperature increase,
the aqueous phases go from clear to hazy to precipitate. The surfactant
is less hydrophilic (compared to CH3O–70PO-100E),
and the range of salinity and temperature with the clear phase shrinks.
For the CH3–O–70PO–120EOH surfactant,
the clear solution salinity and temperature range enlarges because
of increased hydrophilicity. A similar study was repeated to CH3O–70PO–60EOH and CH3O–70PO–150EOH
surfactants. They also went from clear to hazy to precipitated phases
as temperature and salinity increased.
Rheology
of Surfactant Solutions
The viscosity of hazy CH3O–70PO–100EOH surfactant solutions was measured by
a rheometer. The viscosity of the surfactant solution containing 2%
CH3O–70PO–100EOH and 7 wt % NaCl at 25 and
65 °C is shown in Figure . At 65 °C, the solution was hazy; its viscosity was
high and decreased with the shear rate. At 25 °C, the solution
was clear; its viscosity was close to 0.001 Pa s (the water viscosity)
at the room temperature and shear-independent. The shear thinning
viscous behavior is possibly because of the formation of cylindrical
micelles. At 65 °C, the surfactant became more hydrophobic (because
of the PO groups) and the surfactant packing parameter increased close
to 1/2, thus forming cylindrical micelles. To confirm the difference
in sizes of the micelles at 65 °C and 25 °C, particle size
measurements were performed using a Delsa Nano Particle Analyzer and
CryoTEM.
Figure 2
Viscosity of the 2 wt % surfactant in the presence of 7 wt % NaCl
at 25 and 65 °C.
Viscosity of the 2 wt % surfactant in the presence of 7 wt % NaCl
at 25 and 65 °C.The viscosity of the
2 wt % CH3–O–70PO–100EOH surfactant
at different salinity conditions (from 4 to 9 wt % NaCl) was measured
at 65 °C and reported in Figure . The 7 wt % NaCl result is already shown in Figure . The result shows
that the surfactant with 4 and 9 wt % NaCl is not viscous. The surfactant
in 4 wt % NaCl was clear and was not viscous (probably had spherical
micelles), whereas surfactant in 9 wt % NaCl got precipitated and
thus the solution was not viscous. Rest of the solutions were viscous.
Figure 3
Viscosity
of 2 wt % surfactant as a function of salinity at 65 °C.
Viscosity
of 2 wt % surfactant as a function of salinity at 65 °C.The effect of surfactant concentration (CH3O–70PO–100EOH at 25 °C) on viscosity is
shown in Figure .
The surfactant concentration was varied from 0.1–2 wt %. The
salinity was kept constant at 20 wt % NaCl. Room temperature and high
salinity (20 wt % NaCl) were chosen for this experiment because surfactant
solutions form cylindrical micelles at these conditions and evaporation
is not an issue during the rheological study and particle size analysis.
Viscosity increases with the increase in the surfactant concentration
because the number of cylindrical micelles increase. Viscosity increases
sharply as the surfactant concentration goes beyond 1 wt %.
Figure 4
Viscosity of
as a function of surfactant concentration in the presence of 20 wt
% NaCl at 25 °C.
Viscosity of
as a function of surfactant concentration in the presence of 20 wt
% NaCl at 25 °C.
Size
Determination
CyroTEM imaging was performed to visualize
the formation of worm-like micelles. A 2% CH3–O–70PO–100EOH
surfactant sample containing 25 wt % NaCl was prepared at 25 °C.
This solution was found to be viscous, as discussed previously. Another
sample containing 7 wt % NaCl, which was not viscous at 25 °C,
was used as the control. The results from the CryoTEM are shown in Figure . The nonviscous
solution has spherical structures (left picture), and the viscous
solution has cylindrical structures (right picture; at the edges of
the picture). These structures are micelles of the surfactant. The
particle size for spherical micelles (in the nonviscous solution)
is roughly 25 nm and that of the cylindrical micelles (in the viscous
solution) is about 100 nm in length and 25 nm in diameter.
Figure 5
CryoTEM of
the surfactant solutions (left: 7% salt, nonviscous solution, right:
25% salt, viscous solution).
CryoTEM of
the surfactant solutions (left: 7% salt, nonviscous solution, right:
25% salt, viscous solution).The particle size of these solutions was measured by using a Delsa
Nano Particle Analyzer. This analysis presumes spherical shapes and
calculates a diameter distribution. For nonspherical particles, it
is an “equivalent diameter distribution”. The particle
size of a 2% CH3–O–70PO–100EOH surfactant
solution containing 7 wt % NaCl, which formed worm-like micelles at
65 °C, was measured at both 25 and 65 °C. The particle size
distributions are shown in Figures and 7, respectively. The particle
size distribution was log normal, and the parameters are listed in Table . The average particle
size of this sample at 25 °C was around 27.5 nm with a standard
deviation of 12.4 nm, whereas the particle size at 65 °C was
about 112.9 nm with a standard deviation of 99.3 nm. The particle
size at 65 °C is about 3–4 times larger; the corresponding
increase in viscosity indicates that the micelles have changed from
spherical to elongated (worm-like) structures when the solution is
heated to 65 °C.
Figure 6
Delsa “particle size distribution” of 2%
CH3–O–70PO–100EOH solution at 25 °C,
7% NaCl; average particle size is 27.5 nm.
Figure 7
Delsa
“particle size distribution” of CH3–O–70PO–100EOH
solution at 65 °C, 7% NaCl; average particle size is 112.9 nm.
Table 1
Particles Size by the Delsa Nano Analyzer
salt (wt %)
oil
(%)
temperature (°C)
particle size (nm)
polydispersity
7
no
25
27.5
0.126
7
no
65
112.9
0.288
7
5
65
24.9
359.2
0.118
25
no
25
103.8
0.182
Delsa “particle size distribution” of 2%
CH3–O–70PO–100EOH solution at 25 °C,
7% NaCl; average particle size is 27.5 nm.Delsa
“particle size distribution” of CH3–O–70PO–100EOH
solution at 65 °C, 7% NaCl; average particle size is 112.9 nm.The particle size was also studied
as a function of surfactant concentration for the CH3–44O–70PO–100EOH
surfactant. The particle size of the 0.1–2 wt % surfactant
in the presence of 20 wt % NaCl at 25 °C is presented in Figure . The average particle
size of the 0.1 wt % surfactant is 192.1 nm with a standard deviation
of 111.2 nm; the average particle size of the 2 wt % surfactant is
237.9 nm with a standard deviation of 210.6 nm. Rest of the solutions
had the particle sizes in between. The formation of cylindrical micelles
is independent to the surfactant concentration, probably above critical
micelle concentration. However, as the surfactant concentration increased,
the cylindrical micelles got longer and there were more micelles.
Figure 8
Particle
size distribution of CH3–O–70PO–100EOH
at 25 °C, 25% NaCl for several surfactant concentrations.
Particle
size distribution of CH3–O–70PO–100EOH
at 25 °C, 25% NaCl for several surfactant concentrations.
Effect of Hydrocarbon on
Worm-Like Micelles
Some surfactants are well known in the
literature to form worm-like micelles[37,39] The cationic
surfactant cetyl trimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) and anthranilic
acid together have shown to form worm-like micelles[37]Figure shows the viscosity of 1.82 wt % CTAB + 0.68 wt % anthranilic acid
in water at the room temperature. The solution is viscous, and shear
thinning because of worm-like micelles formed. A sample of this solution
was mixed with 5 wt % decane; its viscosity is also shown in Figure . This solution is
Newtonian and has a viscosity close to that of water. The worm-like
micelles were transformed to spherical micelles in the presence of
decane. A similar test was also conducted with 5 wt % crude oil-1
with similar results. Most cylindrical or worm-like surfactant micelles
are often unstable in the presence of crude oil or hydrocarbons.
Figure 9
Viscosity
of 1.82 wt % CTAB + 0.68 wt % anthranilic acid in water with and without
oils at 25 °C.
Viscosity
of 1.82 wt % CTAB + 0.68 wt % anthranilic acid in water with and without
oils at 25 °C.To test the oil compatibility
of cylindrical micelles obtained with the new surfactant molecules,
different amounts (4–8 vol %) of the crude oil-1 was mixed
with the viscous surfactant solutions (containing 2 wt % CH3–O–70PO–100EOH and 7 wt % NaCl) at 65 °C.
The solution was gently mixed and kept at 65 °C for two days.
After two days, the aqueous solutions were found to be clear. The
aqueous solution was carefully separated, and its viscosity was measured.
These viscosities are presented in Figure . Viscosity decreased as the oil amount
in the solution increased. The surfactant solution remained viscous
even in the presence of 8 vol % crude oils in contrast to the CTAB
system discussed in the last paragraph. This is a new finding of this
work. Similar experiments were also performed by adding crude oil-2,
which is a viscous oil. Crude oil-2 had a smaller effect on the micellar
solution viscosity than crude oil-1, as shown in Figure .
Figure 10
Viscosity of 2 wt %
MeO–70PO–100EOH in 7 wt % NaCl aqueous solution in the
presence of oils: (a) with and without crude oil-1 and (b) with and
without crude oil-2.
Viscosity of 2 wt %
MeO–70PO–100EOH in 7 wt % NaCl aqueous solution in the
presence of oils: (a) with and without crude oil-1 and (b) with and
without crude oil-2.From the viscosity data,
it is clear that viscosity decreases with increasing oil concentration.
The viscosity of the solution in the presence of crude oil-2 is relatively
higher than in crude oil-1. In general, viscous oil had a smaller
effect on the micellar solution.Similar experiments were performed
in the presence of 5 vol % decane, dodecane, tetradecane, and octadecane.
These results are shown in Figure . The aqueous solution of 2 wt % CH3–O–70PO–100EOH
in 7% NaCl with 5 vol % hydrocarbon oil shows shear-thinning viscosity.
The longer chain hydrocarbons reduce the viscosity less and have less
interaction with the worm-like micelles. These results are also in
agreement with crude oil results; crude oil-2 (containing heavier
hydrocarbon components) had a smaller effect on the viscosity of worm-like
micelles than the light crude oil-1. These solutions maintained their
viscosity in the presence of crude oils and pure hydrocarbons for
months.
Figure 11
Viscosity of 2 wt % MeO–70PO–100EOH in 7% NaCl with
various oils at 65 °C.
Viscosity of 2 wt % MeO–70PO–100EOH in 7% NaCl with
various oils at 65 °C.The particle size distribution of the surfactant solution (of 2 wt
% MeO–70PO–100EOH in 7% NaCl aqueous solution) with
5 vol % oil-1 at 65 °C is shown in Figure . It has a bimodal distribution with the
peak particle sizes of about 25 and 360 nm. The particle size of the
surfactant solution without the oil is shown in Figure ; the average size was about 112.9 nm with
a standard deviation of 99.3 nm. Table lists the size distributions. Presumably, some of
the cylindrical micelles are changed to spherical micelles after solubilizing
oil.
Figure 12
Intensity distribution of particles of CH3–O–70PO–100EOH
in the presence of 5 wt % oil-1 at 65 °C; average particle sizes
are 24.9 and 359.2 nm.
Intensity distribution of particles of CH3–O–70PO–100EOH
in the presence of 5 wt % oil-1 at 65 °C; average particle sizes
are 24.9 and 359.2 nm.These new class of surfactants
with PO and EO groups formed worm-like micelles under specific temperature
and salinity ranges. At low temperatures, high salinity (>9%) was
required to form worm-like micelles and vice versa. This study is
very unique because no previous study has reported a single surfactant
molecule that forms worm-like micelles at such a wide range of salinity
and temperature conditions. At a given temperature, the salinity range
where viscous behavior was observed can be controlled by changing
the number of EO and PO groups in a given molecule. In addition, these
worm-like micelles were found to be compatible with crude oils to
some extent. In the presence of small amounts of crude oil or pure
alkanes, oil-swollen worm-like micelles were formed with these new
surfactants.[13] One of these new surfactant
molecules was able to keep worm-like micelles in the presence of 8
vol % crude oil or n-alkanes, unlike previous surfactant
systems. This amount of crude oil (or n-alkane) is
about 10 times the value reported in the literature.[42,46] The compatibility of the worm-like micelles with oil is ascribed
to the unique hydrophobic structure of this molecule. Most surfactants
have long hydrocarbon chains as their hydrophobes; these hydrophobes
are very lipophilic and solubilize oils in inner cores of the micelles
leading to break up of cylindrical micelles into spherical micelles.
The surfactants studied here have PO groups as their hydrophobes;
these hydrophobes solubilize less oil into the inner cores and preserve
the cylindrical micelles.Surfactant solutions with worm-like
micelles are viscous. They are often not used for increasing sweep
efficiency in oil reservoirs because these surfactant solutions lose
their viscosity in the presence of oil. The novel surfactants studied
here can develop viscous micellar solutions with limited tolerance
to oil. They also maintain their viscosity at high temperatures and
salinity. Polymer solutions are often used for improvement of sweep
efficiency in oil reservoirs. The typical viscosity needed at the
reservoir conditions is about 0.005–0.05 Pa s at about 10 s–1 shear rate. As shown in Figures –4, these micellar
solutions can achieve this range of viscosity. Commonly used polymers
are susceptible to chemical and thermal degradation under harsh temperatures
and salinity conditions, and they do not transport well in low permeability
formations.[50−52] These worm-like micellar solutions have the potential
to be used for improvement in sweep efficiency during oil displacement
as well as in fracturing.[53,54]
Conclusions
In this study, methanol-based surfactants having
different number of PO and EO groups were synthesized and their micellar
solutions were investigated under different temperature and salinity
conditions. Unlike worm-like micelles of other surfactants reported
in the literature, the worm-like micelles of these surfactants showed
high viscosity in the presence of crude oils and pure hydrocarbons.
This behavior is ascribed to having soft hydrophobic groups of PO
instead of hydrocarbon chains. These surfactants can be useful for
various oil and gas applications, especially for mobility control
in tight formations. The following conclusions can be inferred from
this work:Single surfactants
based on methanol, EO, and PO groups can form worm-like micelles.For the same number of PO and salinity,
the new surfactants form worm-like micelles at higher temperatures
as the number of EO group is increased.The surfactant concentration needs to be about 2 wt % to achieve
a viscosity of 0.05 Pa s in brines.The
worm-like micelles of MeO–70PO–100EOH can tolerate crude-oil/hydrocarbon
up to 8 vol %.Heavier hydrocarbons had
less effect on the viscosity of these worm-like micellar solutions
than lighter hydrocarbons.
Experimental Section
Materials
The
chemicals used in this study are surfactants and salts. Laboratory
grade sodium chloride and CTAB were obtained from Fisher Scientific.
Surfactants CH3–O–mPO–nEOH were synthesized by Harcros Chemicals (Kansas, USA).
These compounds were synthesized to study the interaction of PO groups
(as soft hydrophobes) with oil. These compounds have only one carbon
containing the hard hydrophobe. Compounds with no hard hydrophobe
were studied in the literature as Pluronic block co-polymers.[28] The starting material to synthesize these surfactants
are methanol, whereas the starting material for Pluronics are ethylene
or propylene glycols. Two crude oils were used. Crude oil-1 was a
38° API oil of viscosity 3.7 cP at 25 °C; its acid number
was 0, and base number was 1.6 mg/gm. Crude oil-2 was a 28° API
oil of viscosity 30 cP at 25 °C; its acid number was 0.1 mg/gm.
Hydrocarbons such as n-decane, n-dodecane, n-tetradecane, and n-octadecane were also obtained from Fisher Scientific.The solubility of surfactants in brine
depends on salinity and temperature. A surfactant is called “aqueous
stable” if it totally dissolves in an aqueous solution at a
given salinity and temperature. Aqueous stability of the surfactants
was studied by preparing 4 mL solutions in glass vials containing
the 2 wt % surfactant and varying amounts of NaCl from 0 to 9 wt %.
For CH3–O–70PO–100EOH, the aqueous
stability was also studied in the range of 20–25 wt % NaCl.
These vials were kept in an oven set at a given temperature for about
12 h and the precipitation, aggregation, and clarity were recorded
visually. An example of these samples can be seen in Figure a.
Rheology
The rheology of aqueous surfactant solutions, prepared by adding
given amounts of the surfactant and sodium chloride, was obtained
with a TA Instruments ARG2 rheometer. Viscosity of these solutions
was measured as a function of shear rate and temperature. These experiments
were repeated after adding a given amount of crude oil or pure n-alkane to the surfactant solutions. Rheology as a function
of surfactant concentration was also studied for one of the surfactants.
The surfactant mixed with 20 wt % NaCl had a high viscosity even at
the room temperature.
Size Determination
The size of the surfactant micelles was obtained by the dynamic light
scattering (DLS) method using the Delsa Nano analyzer. The sample
solutions were prepared by mixing the 2 wt % surfactant in 7 wt %
NaCl solutions; the solutions were heated in an oven to 65 °C.
Finally, 1 mL sample was taken in a glass cuvette for DLS measurement.
Then, the sample was allowed to cool to room temperature and the particle
size was measured again.
Cryogenic Transmission
Electron Microscopy
The surfactant solution sample is put
onto a very small grid which is plunged into a liquid ethane bath
at a very low temperature to freeze the surfactant aggregate without
any structural changes. In our measurement, 3 μL of the 2 wt
% CH3–O–70PO–100EOH surfactant in
7 (and 25 wt % for a second sample) NaCl solutions was put onto a
QUANTIFOIL grid and then plunged into ethane at −182 °C
using a Leica GP. The grid was transferred to a Gatan 626 Cryo specimen
holder for imaging in Tecnai Spirit BioTwin 80 kV TEM.