| Literature DB >> 33324686 |
Jonathan Sundin1, Jan Engvall1,2, Eva Nylander1,2, Tino Ebbers1, Ann F Bolger1,3, Carl-Johan Carlhäll1,2.
Abstract
Introduction: The effects of heart rate, inotropy, and lusitropy on multidimensional flow patterns and energetics within the human heart remain undefined. Recently, reduced volume and end-diastolic kinetic energy (KE) of the portion of left ventricular (LV) inflow passing directly to outflow, Direct flow (DF), have been shown to reflect inefficient LV pumping and to be a marker of LV dysfunction in heart failure patients. In this study, we hypothesized that increasing heart rate, inotropy, and lusitropy would result in an increased efficiency of intraventricular blood flow transit. Therefore, we sought to investigate LV 4D blood flow patterns and energetics with dobutamine infusion.Entities:
Keywords: 4D flow CMR; dobutamine stress; flow patterns; flow physiology; hemodynamics; left ventricle; stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance
Year: 2020 PMID: 33324686 PMCID: PMC7724031 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2020.581495
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med ISSN: 2297-055X
Figure 1The CMR protocol. Part 1 is performed at rest and Part 2 during dobutamine infusion.
Figure 2Pathline visualization of the four LV flow components in early diastole at rest (A) and with dobutamine infusion (B).
Demographic and clinical parameters.
| Age (years) | 33 ± 13 | ||
| Gender (f/m) | 8/4 | ||
| Height (cm) | 172 ± 8 | ||
| Weight (kg) | 68 ± 8 | ||
| HR (bpm) | 66 ± 9 | 108 ± 13 | <0.001 |
| BP systolic (mmHg) | 118 ± 13 | 135 ± 15 | 0.021 |
| BP diastolic (mmHg) | 68 ± 9 | 63 ± 8 | 0.251 |
| LVEDV (mL) | 153 ± 28 | 139 ± 35 | 0.004 |
| LVESV (mL) | 65 ± 17 | 36 ± 13 | <0.001 |
| LVEF (%) | 58 ± 5 | 74 ± 5 | <0.001 |
| LVSV (mL) | 88 ± 13 | 102 ± 25 | 0.010 |
| CO (L/min) | 5.8 ± 1.0 | 11.0 ± 2.4 | <0.001 |
HR, heart rate; BP, blood pressure; LV, left ventricle; EDV, end-diastolic volume; ESV, end-systolic volume; EF, ejection fraction; SV, stroke volume; CO, cardiac output.
4D flow parameters.
| DF | 36 ± 6 | 52 ± 8 | <0.001 |
| RI | 20 ± 3 | 20 ± 3 | 0.429 |
| DEF | 17 ± 3 | 13 ± 3 | <0.001 |
| RV | 27 ± 4 | 16 ± 4 | <0.001 |
| DF | 7.7 ± 3.0 | 21.0 ± 5.4 | <0.001 |
| RI | 3.7 ± 1.4 | 9.6 ± 3.1 | <0.001 |
| DEF | 5.8 ± 2.5 | 13.6 ± 6.0 | <0.001 |
| RV | 1.5 ± 0.5 | 2.8 ± 1.0 | <0.001 |
EDV, end diastolic volume; DF, direct flow—blood that both enters and leaves the LV within one cardiac cycle; KE.
Figure 3Distribution of the flow components presented as mean ± SD at rest (A) and with dobutamine infusion (B). LV end-diastolic volume presented as mean ± SD mL in the center of the circles.
Figure 4Volume proportion of EDV for Direct flow (Y-axis) and Residual volume (X-axis) at rest (white circles) and with dobutamine infusion (black circles) in the healthy subjects.
Figure 5KE/volume (μJ/mL) for each flow component. Graphs in bright color (left) represent values at rest and graphs in dark color (right) represent values with dobutamine infusion. DF, direct flow; RI, retained inflow; DEF, delayed ejection flow; RV, residual volume.
Figure 6KE over diastole at rest (left) and with dobutamine infusion (right) for Direct Flow (A,E), Retained Inflow (B,F), Delayed Ejection Flow (C,G), and Residual Volume (D,H). The dotted line represents End-Diastole.