| Literature DB >> 33324670 |
Yayuan Zhang1,2, Lei Nie3, Jian Sun1,2, Yan Hong4, Huabing Yan5, Mingjuan Li1,2, Xiangrong You1,2, Ling Zhu4, Fang Fang6.
Abstract
The impacts of environmental conditions on pasting and physicochemical properties were investigated using flour samples of the same cassava cultivar grown in seven different locations. Significant location differences in essential component (except for fiber) content of cassava flour were observed. Cassava flour showed obviously separated traits in the principal component analysis (PCA) of near-infrared spectra (NIR) according to geographical origins. The environmental effects were significant in the pasting properties of cassava flours. Sufficient precipitation and suitable low temperature promoted accumulation of starch in cassava, resulting in the high peak viscosity values of cassava flour. Pasting temperatures of cassava flour had a significant direct correlation with growth temperature and were negatively correlated with altitude. Precipitation from August to October showed a stronger direct correlation with trough and final viscosity. The results of this study indicated the possibility of predicting and controlling cassava flour quality and pasting properties according to the environmental conditions.Entities:
Keywords: cassava flour; component; environment; pasting properties; physicochemical traits
Year: 2020 PMID: 33324670 PMCID: PMC7725801 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2020.598960
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Nutr ISSN: 2296-861X
Figure 1(A) The NIR spectral curves of all cassava flour samples. (B) Score plots from the principal component analysis of NIR spectral data of cassava flours. GL, Guilin; GP, Guiping; HP, Hepu; JX, Jingxi; LY, Leye; LS, Lingshan; RA, Rongan.
Proximate composition contents in cassava flour and particle size of cassava starch.
| Guilin | 82.0 ± 1.2a | 1.9 ± 0.2c | 2.8 ± 0.3a | 2.4 ± 0.4cd | 17.2 ± 0.4a | 9.0 ± 0.2d |
| Guiping | 78.1 ± 0.8bc | 3.0 ± 0.5bc | 2.0 ± 0.5a | 1.9 ± 0.2d | 17.1 ± 0.4a | 10.2 ± 0.1bc |
| Hepu | 75.35 ± 0.6c | 4.3 ± 0.4a | 2.4 ± 0.1a | 3.9 ± 0.2a | 15.1 ± 0.2b | 10.1 ± 0.0bc |
| Jingxi | 79.3 ± 1.4ab | 2.5 ± 0.4bc | 2.5 ± 0.3a | 2.0 ± 0.5d | 16.6 ± 0.4a | 10.0 ± 0.1c |
| Leye | 78.6 ± 1.7abc | 2.6 ± 0.3bc | 2.3 ± 0.1a | 3.6 ± 0.1ab | 15.0 ± 0.1b | 10.1 ± 0.1bc |
| Lingshan | 77.8 ± 0.9bc | 2.1 ± 0.7bc | 2.5 ± 0.2a | 3.1 ± 0.3bc | 17.4 ± 0.6a | 10.5 ± 0.2a |
| Rongan | 77.5 ± 1.6bc | 3.6 ± 0.6ab | 2.7 ± 0.5a | 2.9 ± 0.4bc | 16.9 ± 0.1a | 10.3 ± 0.3ab |
| Mean | 78.4 | 2.9 | 2.5 | 2.8 | 16.5 | 10.0 |
| CV (%) | 2.6 | 29.2 | 10.6 | 28.0 | 6.1 | 4.7 |
Particle size: D [v, 0.5].
CV, Coefficient of Variation.
Data (mean ± standard deviation) in the same column with different lowercase letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Correlation coefficient between weather conditions with mediating factors (starch, protein, fiber, and ash contents, amylose content, starch particle size) and response variables (pasting properties).
| PRE | 1 | |||||||||||||||
| TEMP | −0.13 | 1 | ||||||||||||||
| ALT | −0.22 | −0.86 | 1 | |||||||||||||
| Starch | 0.67 | −0.62 | 0.27 | 1 | ||||||||||||
| Protein | −0.27 | 0.57 | −0.26 | −0.83 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Fiber | 0.61 | −0.05 | 0.04 | 0.33 | −0.13 | 1 | ||||||||||
| Ash | −0.27 | 0.08 | 0.03 | −0.57 | 0.42 | 0.1 | 1 | |||||||||
| AMY | 0.4 | 0.22 | −0.42 | 0.46 | −0.49 | 0.2 | −0.74 | 1 | ||||||||
| Particle | −0.83 | 0.34 | −0.01 | −0.77 | 0.4 | −0.45 | 0.25 | −0.13 | 1 | |||||||
| PV | 0.34 | −0.59 | 0.47 | 0.78 | −0.51 | 0.06 | −0.68 | 0.17 | −0.65 | 1 | ||||||
| Trough | −0.31 | −0.76 | 0.72 | 0.13 | −0.3 | −0.22 | 0.45 | −0.65 | −0.04 | 0.15 | 1 | |||||
| BD | 0.4 | −0.44 | 0.32 | 0.78 | −0.5 | 0.11 | −0.79 | 0.34 | −0.64 | 0.98 | −0.05 | 1 | ||||
| FV | −0.06 | −0.64 | 0.62 | 0.23 | −0.2 | 0.05 | 0.42 | −0.71 | −0.4 | 0.35 | 0.85 | 0.18 | 1 | |||
| SB | 0.64 | 0.13 | −0.18 | 0.45 | −0.05 | 0.6 | −0.43 | 0.31 | −0.72 | 0.55 | −0.49 | 0.64 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
| PT | −0.4 | 0.03 | 0 | −0.61 | 0.42 | −0.36 | 0.86 | −0.71 | 0.4 | −0.68 | 0.51 | −0.81 | 0.29 | −0.73 | 1 | |
| PP | −0.19 | 0.96 | −0.87 | −0.63 | 0.45 | −0.08 | 0.23 | 0.18 | 0.37 | −0.7 | −0.6 | −0.58 | −0.55 | −0.01 | 0.18 | 1 |
PRE, precipitation was collected from April to December, 2015; TEMP, average daily temperature was collected and calculated from April to December, 2015; ALT, altitude; Amylose, amylase content in cassava flour; Particle: D [v, 0.5]; PV, peak viscosity; BD, breakdown; FV, final viscosity; SB, setback; PT, peak time; PP, pasting temperature.
Significant difference at p < 0.05.
Significant difference at p < 0.01.
Pasting properties of cassava flours harvested from different locations.
| Guilin | 4994 ± 239a | 1651 ± 25b | 3343 ± 216a | 2407 ± 18ab | 756 ± 34a | 5.3 ± 0.1cd | 65.9 ± 0.5c |
| Guiping | 4571 ± 259b | 1602 ± 98b | 2969 ± 194b | 2270 ± 95bc | 667 ± 35abc | 5.7 ± 0.2bc | 68.3 ± 0.6b |
| Hepu | 3954 ± 133c | 1646 ± 89b | 2309 ± 154c | 2403 ± 63ab | 703 ± 59abc | 6.3 ± 0.5a | 71.3 ± 0.0a |
| Jingxi | 5139 ± 73a | 1666 ± 46b | 3473 ± 70a | 2395 ± 53ab | 729 ± 35ab | 5.0 ± 0.1d | 65.2 ± 0.5c |
| Leye | 4474 ± 307b | 1871 ± 84a | 2603 ± 226c | 2496 ± 98a | 625 ± 29c | 6.5 ± 0.4a | 63.1 ± 0.5d |
| Lingshan | 3855 ± 87c | 1660 ± 90b | 2295 ± 78c | 2309 ± 57bc | 648 ± 45bc | 5.9 ± 0.1ab | 70.6 ± 0.7a |
| Rongan | 4053 ± 241c | 1561 ± 35b | 2493 ± 217c | 2253 ± 35c | 692 ± 50abc | 5.7 ± 0.1bc | 67.7 ± 0.2b |
| Mean | 4434 | 1665 | 2783 | 2357 | 689 | 5.8 | 67.4 |
| CV (%) | 11.4 | 5.9 | 17.4 | 3.7 | 6.6 | 9.0 | 4.4 |
PV, peak viscosity; BD, breakdown; FV, final viscosity; SB, setback; PT, peak time; PP, pasting temperature; CV, Coefficient of Variation.
Data (mean ± standard deviation) in the same column with different lowercase letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Figure 2(A) Correlation between average daily temperature and responses. (B) Correlation between precipitation and responses. Peak_visc, peak viscosity; Final_visc, final viscosity; Pasting_temp, pasting temperature; Starch_cont, starch content in cassava flour; Fiber_cont, fiber content in cassava flour; Protein_cont, protein content in cassava flour; Ash_cont, ash content in cassava flour; AMY_cont1, amylose content in cassava flour; Particle_size, D [v, 0.5].
Figure 3(A) Correlation between average daily temperature and potential mediators. (B) Correlation between precipitation and potential mediators. Peak_visc, peak viscosity; Final_visc, final viscosity; Pasting_temp, pasting temperature; Starch_cont, starch content in cassava flour; Fiber_cont, fiber content in cassava flour; Protein_cont, protein content in cassava flour; Ash_cont, ash content in cassavaflour; AMY_cont1, amylose content in cassava flour; Particle_size, D [v, 0.5].