| Literature DB >> 33324408 |
André J Esgalhado1, Débora Reste-Ferreira1, Stephanie E Albino1, Adriana Sousa1, Ana Paula Amaral1, António Martinho2, Isabel T Oliveira3, Ignacio Verde1,4, Olga Lourenço1,4, Ana M Fonseca1,4, Elsa M Cardoso1,4,5, Fernando A Arosa1,4.
Abstract
There is increasing evidence that in humans the adaptive immunological system can influence cognitive functions of the brain. We have undertaken a comprehensive immunological analysis of lymphocyte and monocyte populations as well as of HLA molecules expression in a cohort of elderly volunteers (age range, 64-101) differing in their cognitive status. Hereby, we report on the identification of a novel signature in cognitively impaired elderly characterized by: (1) elevated percentages of CD8+ T effector-memory cells expressing high levels of the CD45RA phosphate receptor (Temra hi); (2) high percentages of CD8+ T cells expressing high levels of the CD8β chain (CD8βhi); (3) augmented production of IFNγ by in vitro activated CD4+ T cells. Noteworthy, CD3+CD8+ Temra hi and CD3+CD8βhi cells were associated with impaired cognition. Cytomegalovirus seroprevalence showed that all volunteers studied but one were CMV positive. Finally, we show that some of these phenotypic and functional features are associated with an increased frequency of the HLA-B8 serotype, which belongs to the ancestral haplotype HLA-A1, Cw7, B8, DR3, DQ2, among cognitively impaired volunteers. To our knowledge, this is the first proof in humans linking the amount of cell surface CD45RA and CD8β chain expressed by CD8+ Temra cells, and the amount of IFNγ produced by in vitro activated CD4+ T cells, with impaired cognitive function in the elderly.Entities:
Keywords: CD4+ IFNγ+; HLA class I; brain cognition; effector-memory CD8+ T cells; elderly; healthy aging
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33324408 PMCID: PMC7723833 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.592656
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Relevant data of the volunteers under study.
| Clinical data |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cognitive Status (number) | NCI (n=13) | MCI (n=15) | CI (n=22) | – |
| Age, Mean ± SEM (range) | 83.7 ± 2.4 (69-96) | 82.5 ± 2.1 (64-96) | 84.7 ± 1.9 (67-101) | NS |
| Gender (M/F) | 8/5 | 3/12 | 4/18 | 0.023 |
| Gait Speed (m/s) | 0.60 ± 0.05 | 0.41 ± 0.06 | 0.33 ± 0.04 | 0.003 |
| Body Mass Index (BMI) | 25.4 ± 2.6 | 23.1 ± 2.7 | 20.9 ± 3.4 | NS |
| CMV Seropositivy | 12/13 | 15/15 | 22/22 | NS |
|
|
| |||
| % CD19+ (B cells) | 4.6 ± 0.8 | 5.1 ± 1.0 | 3.7 ± 0.6 | NS |
| % CD3−CD56+ (NK cells) | 24.5 ± 3.4 | 25.0 ± 3.0 | 25.4 ± 3.2 | NS |
| % CD3+CD56+ (NKT cells) | 8.1 ± 1.5 | 8.3 ± 1.5 | 5.3 ± 0.9 | NS |
| % CD3+ T cells (T cells) | 66.6 ± 2.9 | 67.0 ± 2.4 | 67.9 ± 3.3 | NS |
| % CD3+CD4+ T cells | 34.8 ± 4.1 | 40.3 ± 3.6 | 39.6 ± 2.3 | NS |
| % CD4+ T | 40.9 ± 6.5 | 34.6 ± 6.3 | 48.8 ± 3.4 | NS |
| % CD4+ T | 31.6 ± 3.2 | 37.7 ± 4.2 | 28.7 ± 2.5 | NS |
| % CD4+ T | 20.1 ± 4.8 | 23.4 ± 3.7 | 16.6 ± 2.1 | NS |
| % CD4+ T | 7.3 ± 2.6 | 4.4 ± 1.4 | 5.9 ± 1.7 | NS |
| % CD3+CD8+ T cells | 31.4 ± 4.9 | 26.0 ± 2.9 | 27.7 ± 2.5 | NS |
| % CD8+ T | 11.9 ± 2.5 | 14.3 ± 2.6 | 14.3 ± 1.9 | NS |
| % CD8+ T | 6.8 ± 1.2 | 9.2 ± 2.0 | 7.5 ± 1.3 | NS |
| % CD8+ T | 19.5 ± 4.1 | 20.2 ± 3.7 | 17.4 ± 3.0 | NS |
| % CD8+ T | 61.8 ± 5.1 | 56.4 ± 4.5 | 60.8 ± 4.3 | NS |
|
| ||||
| % CD14+CD16− (classical) | 85.5 ± 1.8 | 82.1 ± 3.6 | 81.4 ± 2.4 | NS |
| % CD14+CD16+ (intermediate) | 4.4 ± 0.7 | 5.8 ± 0.9 | 6.8 ± 1.2 | NS |
| % CD14−CD16+ (non-classical) | 6.0 ± 0.9 | 7.8 ± 2.9 | 7.0 ± 1.4 | NS |
| % CD14+CD202b+ | 3.5 ± 0.9 | 3.1 ± 0.4 | 4.7 ± 1.0 | NS |
| % CD16+CD202b+ | 3.0 ± 0.7 | 2.2 ± 0.5 | 3.5 ± 0.9 | NS |
|
| NCI (n=14) | MCI (n=15) | CI (n=23) |
|
| HLA-A03 | 14.3 | 23.3 | 4.3 | 0.044*** |
| HLA-B08 | 0.0 | 6.7 | 17.4 | 0.034* |
| HLA-C12 | 17.9 | 26.7 | 6.5 | 0.045*** |
| HLA-DQB1_6 | 14.3 | 26.7 | 6.5 | 0.045*** |
Cognitive status determined by Global Scale Deterioration (see Materials and Methods section). NCI, No Cognitive Impairment; MCI, Mild Cognitive Impairment; CI, Cognitive Impairment.
Percentages determined after gating in the lymphocyte gate.
Percentages determined after gating in CD3+CD4+ T cells.
Percentages determined after gating in CD3+CD8+ T cells.
Percentages determined after gating in the monocyte gate.
Percentages determined after applying the following formula: # of seropositive antigens ×100 /(# of volunteers per group x 2). In the serological analysis two additional volunteers (one NCI and one CI) without flow cytometry data were included.
P-values determined by One-way ANOVA test; NS, Not significant.
P-values determined by Fisher’s Exact test with Post-Hoc z-test to compare column proportions with p-values adjusted using Bonferroni’s method.
*Statistically significantly different between NCI and CI.
**Statistically significantly different between NCI vs. MCI (p=0.045) and NCI vs. CI (p=0.003).
***Statistically significant different between MCI and CI.
Figure 1Gating strategy to study monocyte and lymphocyte populations. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were isolated and stained as described in Material and Methods section. Labeled cells were acquired in a BD Accuri C6 flow cytometer and monocytes and lymphocytes discriminated according to FSC and SSC characteristics (top dot-plot). Markers were analyzed after creating and electronic gate around monocytes (A) and lymphocytes (B). The different T cell markers expressed (y axes) were analyzed after creating electronic gates in CD3+CD4+ T cells (B, upper row) and CD3+CD8+ T cells (B, middle row). NK (CD3−CD56+), NKT (CD3+CD56+) and B (CD19+) cells were calculated as indicated (B, lower row).
Figure 2PBMC were isolated, stained and acquired as described in the legend of . (A) Mean Fluorescence Intensity (MFI) values (a.u., mean ± SEM) of the expression of CD45RA after gating on CD3+CD8+CD45RA+ T cells in the three groups of elderly volunteers. Statistically significant differences between groups are indicated (ANOVA with Bonferroni’s correction). (B, left) Dot-plot of CCR7 vs. CD45RA expression in CD3+CD8+ gated T cells showing naive (Tn), central-memory (Tcm), effector-memory (Tem) and effector-memory CD45RA+ (Temra) cells. (B, right) Zoom of dot-plot lower quadrants (Tem + Temra) showing the existence of distinct subpopulations according to the level of expression of CD45RA: CD45RAnull, CD45RAlo, and CD45RAhi. (C) Plots of CCR7 vs. CD45RA expression in CD3+CD8+ gated T cells (upper row dot-plots) and CD45 expression (lower row histograms) in three representative volunteers. Histograms show CD45RA expression in CD3+CD8+CCR7− gated Tem+Temra cells. Three distinct CD8+CD45RA T cell populations differing in their MFI values can be distinguished: CD8+CD45RAnull, CD8+CD45RAlo and CD8+CD45RAhi. (D) Graph showing the relative percentage of CD45RAlo (blue circles) and CD45RAhi (red circles) in CD8+CCR7−CD45RA+ gated T cells in the three volunteer groups (mean ± SEM). Statistically significant differences between groups are indicated (ANOVA with Bonferroni’s correction). a.u., arbitrary units.
Figure 3PBMC were isolated, stained and acquired as described in the legend of . (A, left) Dot-plot of CD8β vs. CD8α expression in CD3+CD8+ gated T cells. (A, right) Zoom of CD3+CD8αβ+ T cells showing the existence of two distinct populations according to the level of expression of CD8β: CD3+CD8βhi and CD3+CD8βlo. (B) Graph showing the percentage of CD3+CD8βlo (blue circles) and CD3+CD8βhi (red circles) in CD3+CD8+ gated T cells in the three volunteer groups (mean ± SEM). Statistically significant differences between groups are indicated (ANOVA with Bonferroni’s correction). (C) Scatter-plot showing a significant positive correlation between the percentages of CD8+ Temra lo and CD8βlo T cells (Pearson correlation, n=50). a.u., arbitrary units.
Figure 5Heatmap showing two clusters of variables, Cluster 1 (% CD8+ Temra lo and % CD8βlo) and Cluster 2 (% CD8+ Temra hi, % CD8βhi and IFNγ MFI CD4+ T), associated with no cognitively impaired (NCI) and cognitively impaired (CI) volunteers, respectively.
Figure 4PBMC were isolated, activated with PMA+Iono for 4 h, washed and stained for CD3, CD4, CD8 and CD28, then fixed & permeabilized and stained again for IFNγ, and acquired in an Accuri C6 flow cytometer, as described in the Material and Methods section. (A) Graph illustrating the gating strategy to analyze IFNγ expression by activated T cells. Results show a representative experiment of the percentage of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells expressing intracellular IFNγ Upper graphs show background staining using an irrelevant IgG isotype. Percentages of CD3+CD4+IFNγ+ T cells and CD3+CD8+IFNγ+ T cells, as well as IFNγ MFI values are shown. (B) Illustrative results of IFNγ MFI values in activated CD4+ (left histograms) and CD8+ (right histograms) T cells from representative volunteers. (C) Graph showing MFI values of intracellular IFNγ (mean ± SEM) in gated CD4+ (red circles) and CD8+ (blue circles) T cells. Statistically significant differences between groups are indicated (ANOVA with Bonferroni’s correction).
Figure 6Upper figure represents part of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) region, also known as the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) region on the short arm of chromosome 6. The table beneath shows the ancestral B8 haplotype alleles or its partial fragments (in red). The haplotypes were reconstructed by imputation of the allele markers and are putative, because it was not possible to strictly prove their segregation from family studies. The number of volunteers and the percentage within the cognitive status groups are shown. The shared B8 ancestral haplotypes are also shown (in green). *DR17 serotype; NCI, No-Cognitive Impairment; MCI, Mild Cognitive Impairment; CI, Cognitive Impairment. #P-values were calculated using Fisher’s Exact Test with Post-Hoc z-test to compare column proportions with p-values adjusted using Bonferroni’s method. **Statistically significantly different between NCI and CI groups.