OBJECTIVES: Malpractice litigation causes extreme stress. We examine the psychological impact of malpractice claims on physicians' well-being and the consequences on patient care. METHODS: A confidential telephone survey, administered to physicians with both open and closed claims from the previous year, explored symptoms, well-being changes, needs, impairments, and practice changes. RESULTS: Of the 282 respondents, more than half (56.38%) reported a notable psychological reaction to the malpractice claim, with no differences between the open and closed claims (P = 0.2477) or between closed claims with and without a payout (P = 1). Physicians facing criminal proceedings were more likely to experience a notable psychological impact (P = 0.0206). Almost half of the respondents (45.39%) acknowledged practice changes: viewing patients as potential plaintiffs (45.39%), paying more attention to recordkeeping (42.19%), obtaining medicolegal training (37.94%), ordering more tests (36.17%), and avoiding specific kinds of patients (21.63%) or procedures (19.85%). Acknowledging a psychological impact was positively and significantly associated with professional practice changes (P < 0.0001), and the mean number of symptoms was significantly higher among those who acknowledged practice changes (P = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm the psychological impact of a malpractice claim and that impacted physicians are more likely to change their care practices, involving defensive medicine practices. Therefore, care for physicians facing malpractice claims needs to be considered under the umbrella of health care quality. Timely mental health referral paths could help mitigate the psychological impact and avoid the pernicious effects of negative practice changes.
OBJECTIVES: Malpractice litigation causes extreme stress. We examine the psychological impact of malpractice claims on physicians' well-being and the consequences on patient care. METHODS: A confidential telephone survey, administered to physicians with both open and closed claims from the previous year, explored symptoms, well-being changes, needs, impairments, and practice changes. RESULTS: Of the 282 respondents, more than half (56.38%) reported a notable psychological reaction to the malpractice claim, with no differences between the open and closed claims (P = 0.2477) or between closed claims with and without a payout (P = 1). Physicians facing criminal proceedings were more likely to experience a notable psychological impact (P = 0.0206). Almost half of the respondents (45.39%) acknowledged practice changes: viewing patients as potential plaintiffs (45.39%), paying more attention to recordkeeping (42.19%), obtaining medicolegal training (37.94%), ordering more tests (36.17%), and avoiding specific kinds of patients (21.63%) or procedures (19.85%). Acknowledging a psychological impact was positively and significantly associated with professional practice changes (P < 0.0001), and the mean number of symptoms was significantly higher among those who acknowledged practice changes (P = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm the psychological impact of a malpractice claim and that impacted physicians are more likely to change their care practices, involving defensive medicine practices. Therefore, care for physicians facing malpractice claims needs to be considered under the umbrella of health care quality. Timely mental health referral paths could help mitigate the psychological impact and avoid the pernicious effects of negative practice changes.
Authors: Michele Treglia; Margherita Pallocci; Pierluigi Passalacqua; Jacopo Giammatteo; Lucilla De Luca; Silvestro Mauriello; Alberto Michele Cisterna; Luigi Tonino Marsella Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-06-03 Impact factor: 3.390