Laureano A Rementería-Capelo1, Inés Contreras, Jorge L García-Perez, Virginia Carrillo, Juan Gros-Otero, Javier Ruiz-Alcocer. 1. Clínica Rementería (L.A.R.-C., I.C., J.L.G.-P., V.C., J.G.-O.), Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal (I.C.), Madrid, Spain; Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigaciones Sanitarias (IRYCIS) (I.C.), Madrid, Spain; and Departamento de Optometría y Visión, Universidad Complutense de Madrid (J.R.-A.), Madrid, Spain.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the impact of 0.50 diopter (D) positive or negative defocus on visual function in patients implanted with trifocal and trifocal toric intraocular lenses (IOLs). METHODS: The study included patients implanted with the AcrySof IQ PanOptix IOL or the PanOptix Toric. Visual acuity (VA) at high (100%), medium (50%) and low (10%) contrast, contrast sensitivity function (CSF), and halo perception were assessed three months after surgery. Explorations were performed with corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), with a positive defocus of +0.50D (myopization) and with a negative defocus of -0.50D (hyperopization). RESULTS: The study included 60 eyes of 60 patients (30 eyes with PanOptix and 30 eyes with PanOptix Toric). For both groups, VA was better for all contrast settings at the CDVA situation (P<0.05 in all cases). For low spatial frequencies, no differences in CSF were found among the three refractive situations in either group. For higher frequencies, the results showed an overall trend for better CSF results for the CDVA situation. The halo effect was lower for the CDVA situation if compared to myopization and hyperopization in both the PanOptix and the PanOptix Toric groups (P<0.05 for all cases). CONCLUSIONS: There is an impact on visual quality and halo perception in patients implanted with trifocal or trifocal toric IOLs even for low residual refractive errors.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the impact of 0.50 diopter (D) positive or negative defocus on visual function in patients implanted with trifocal and trifocal toric intraocular lenses (IOLs). METHODS: The study included patients implanted with the AcrySof IQ PanOptix IOL or the PanOptix Toric. Visual acuity (VA) at high (100%), medium (50%) and low (10%) contrast, contrast sensitivity function (CSF), and halo perception were assessed three months after surgery. Explorations were performed with corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), with a positive defocus of +0.50D (myopization) and with a negative defocus of -0.50D (hyperopization). RESULTS: The study included 60 eyes of 60 patients (30 eyes with PanOptix and 30 eyes with PanOptix Toric). For both groups, VA was better for all contrast settings at the CDVA situation (P<0.05 in all cases). For low spatial frequencies, no differences in CSF were found among the three refractive situations in either group. For higher frequencies, the results showed an overall trend for better CSF results for the CDVA situation. The halo effect was lower for the CDVA situation if compared to myopization and hyperopization in both the PanOptix and the PanOptix Toric groups (P<0.05 for all cases). CONCLUSIONS: There is an impact on visual quality and halo perception in patients implanted with trifocal or trifocal toric IOLs even for low residual refractive errors.
Authors: Antonio Cano-Ortiz; Álvaro Sánchez-Ventosa; Timoteo González-Cruces; David Cerdán-Palacios; Vanesa Díaz-Mesa; Rubén Gallego-Ordóñez; Teresa Gálvez-Gómez; Jose A García Parrizas; Javier Zurera Baena; Alberto Villarrubia-Cuadrado Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-10-08 Impact factor: 4.964