| Literature DB >> 33323573 |
Ugur Gurlevik1, Ahmet Karakoyun2, Erdogan Yasar1.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to reveal the cause of meibomian gland disease and meibomian gland loss in patients with Sjögren's syndrome (SS) as the leading factor for dry eyes.Entities:
Keywords: Dry eye disease; MGD; Sjogren's syndrome; TBUT; meibography
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33323573 PMCID: PMC7926172 DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_2383_19
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Ophthalmol ISSN: 0301-4738 Impact factor: 1.848
Comparison of Meibium gland abnormalities between Sjögren patients and control groups
| Sjogren patients | Control patients | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| MG loss (%) - Mean ± (SD) | 19.7±7.1 | 12.7±9.6 | <0.001 |
| MG loss stage | 1.33±0.47 | 0.36±0.53 | <0.001 |
| Meibium gland dysfunction (%) | 23.3 (7) | 6 (3) | 0.035 |
| Meibomian gland occlusion (%) | 23.3 (7) | 6 (3) | 91 |
| Telengiectazia (%) | 50 (15) | 24 (12) | 0.033 |
| Mucocutaneous junction shifts (%) | 26.7 (8) | 6 (3) | 0.016 |
| Lid margin irregularity (notching)(%) | 30 (9) | 8 (4) | 0.014 |
MG: Meibomian Gland, SD: Standard Deviation
Figure 1Computer-assisted analysis of meibomian gland morphology in Sjogren's syndrome patients
Figure 2Computer-assisted analysis of meibomian gland morphology in control patients
Ocular surface parameters in the Sjögren patients and control groups
| Sjogren patients | Control patients | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Tear film breakup time (s) - Mean ± (SD) | 9.4±3.4 | 13.5±3.7 | <0.001 |
| Schirmer’s test score (mm) - Mean ± (SD) | 5.3±2.8 | 13.7±5.3 | <0.001 |
| Ocular symptoms (OSDİ) - Mean ± (SD) | 20.1±6.8 | 6.2±3.6 | <0.001 |
| Staining score - Mean ± (SD) | 1.4±0.8 | 0.3±0.5 | <0.001 |
| Dry eye disease % | 60 (18) | 6 (3) | <0.001 |
OSDI: Ocular surface disease index, SD: Standard Deviation
Figure 3BUT/Staining correlation with loss of upper lid meibomian gland. MB: Meibomian Gland BUT: Breakup time
Figure 4BUT/Staining correlation with loss of lower lid meibomian gland. MB: Meibomian Gland BUT: Breakup time