PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization for the palliation of radiotherapy (RT)-failure bone metastases (BMs) with those of re-radiotherapy (Re-RT) in achieving pain relief. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty consecutive patients with RT-failure BMs who had undergone Re-RT (23 patients) and transarterial chemoembolization (27 patients) were retrospectively analyzed. The primary endpoint was clinical response, and the secondary endpoints were objective response and adverse events. Pain assessment was performed using the numerical rating scale, and tumor response was evaluated using the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Pain relief was defined as lack of pain with no analgesic usage (complete pain response) or a decrease in pain score by ≥3 points with analgesic usage (partial pain response). RESULTS: The pain relief rates in the Re-RT and transarterial chemoembolization groups were 57% and 92%, respectively (P = .006). The median pain relief duration was 2 and 3 months in the Re-RT and transarterial chemoembolization groups, respectively (P = .002). The 6-month pain-free survival rates were 30% and 51% in the Re-RT and transarterial chemoembolization groups, respectively (P = .08). The median tumor reduction rates were -4% and 9% in the Re-RT and transarterial chemoembolization groups, respectively (P < .001). The objective response rates were 0% and 11% in the Re-RT and transarterial chemoembolization groups, respectively (P = .29). No serious adverse events or complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Transarterial chemoembolization achieved a superior response rate and longer duration of palliation in symptomatic RT-failure BMs.
PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization for the palliation of radiotherapy (RT)-failure bone metastases (BMs) with those of re-radiotherapy (Re-RT) in achieving pain relief. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty consecutive patients with RT-failure BMs who had undergone Re-RT (23 patients) and transarterial chemoembolization (27 patients) were retrospectively analyzed. The primary endpoint was clinical response, and the secondary endpoints were objective response and adverse events. Pain assessment was performed using the numerical rating scale, and tumor response was evaluated using the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Pain relief was defined as lack of pain with no analgesic usage (complete pain response) or a decrease in pain score by ≥3 points with analgesic usage (partial pain response). RESULTS: The pain relief rates in the Re-RT and transarterial chemoembolization groups were 57% and 92%, respectively (P = .006). The median pain relief duration was 2 and 3 months in the Re-RT and transarterial chemoembolization groups, respectively (P = .002). The 6-month pain-free survival rates were 30% and 51% in the Re-RT and transarterial chemoembolization groups, respectively (P = .08). The median tumor reduction rates were -4% and 9% in the Re-RT and transarterial chemoembolization groups, respectively (P < .001). The objective response rates were 0% and 11% in the Re-RT and transarterial chemoembolization groups, respectively (P = .29). No serious adverse events or complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Transarterial chemoembolization achieved a superior response rate and longer duration of palliation in symptomatic RT-failure BMs.