Literature DB >> 33323253

Innovative intelligent insole system reduces diabetic foot ulcer recurrence at plantar sites: a prospective, randomised, proof-of-concept study.

Caroline A Abbott1, Katie E Chatwin2, Philip Foden3, Ahmad N Hasan4, Chandbi Sange5, Satyan M Rajbhandari5, Prabhav N Reddy6, Loretta Vileikyte7, Frank L Bowling8, Andrew J M Boulton7, Neil D Reeves2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prevention of diabetic foot ulcer recurrence in high risk patients, using current standard of care methods, remains a challenge. We hypothesised that an innovative intelligent insole system would be effective in reducing diabetic foot ulcer recurrence in such patients.
METHODS: In this prospective, randomised, proof-of-concept study, patients with diabetes, and with peripheral neuropathy and a recent history of plantar foot ulceration were recruited from two multidisciplinary outpatient diabetic foot clinics in the UK, and were randomly assigned to either intervention or control. All patients received an insole system, which measured plantar pressure continuously during daily life. The intervention group received audiovisual alerts via a smartwatch linked to the insole system and offloading instructions when aberrant pressures were detected; the control group did not receive any alerts. The primary outcome was plantar foot ulcer occurrence within 18 months. This trial is registered with ISRCTN, ISRCTN05585501, and is closed to accrual and complete.
FINDINGS: Between March 18, 2014, and Dec 20, 2016, 90 patients were recruited and consented to the study, and 58 completed the study. At follow-up, ten ulcers from 8638 person-days were recorded in the control group and four ulcers from 11 835 person-days in the intervention group: a 71% reduction in ulcer incidence in the intervention group compared with the control group (incidence rate ratio 0·29, 95% CI, 0·09-0·93; p=0·037). The number of patients who ulcerated was similar between groups (six of 26 [control group] vs four of 32 [intervention group]; p=0·29); however, individual plantar sites ulcerated more often in the control group (ten of 416) than in the intervention group (four of 512; p=0·047). In an exploratory analysis of good compliers (n=40), ulcer incidence was reduced by 86% in the intervention group versus control group (incidence rate ratio 0·14, 95% CI 0·03-0·63; p=0·011). In the exploratory analysis, plantar callus severity (change from baseline to 6 months) was greater in re-ulcerating patients (6·5, IQR 4·0-8·3) than non-re-ulcerating patients (2·0, 0·0-4·8; p=0·040).
INTERPRETATION: To our knowledge, this study is the first to show that continuous plantar pressure monitoring and dynamic offloading guidance, provided by an innovative intelligent insole system, can lead to a reduction in diabetic foot ulcer site recurrence. FUNDING: Diabetes UK and Orpyx Medical Technologies.
Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 33323253     DOI: 10.1016/S2589-7500(19)30128-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Digit Health        ISSN: 2589-7500


  13 in total

1.  Wearable Bioelectronics for Chronic Wound Management.

Authors:  Canran Wang; Ehsan Shirzaei Sani; Wei Gao
Journal:  Adv Funct Mater       Date:  2021-12-26       Impact factor: 19.924

Review 2.  The Influence of Wearables on Health Care Outcomes in Chronic Disease: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Graeme Mattison; Oliver Canfell; Doug Forrester; Chelsea Dobbins; Daniel Smith; Juha Töyräs; Clair Sullivan
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 7.076

3.  Post-healing follow-up study of patients in remission for diabetic foot ulcers Pied-REM study.

Authors:  Marie Bouly; Francois-Xavier Laborne; Caroline Tourte; Elodie Henry; Alfred Penfornis; Dured Dardari
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 4.  Footwear and insole design features for offloading the diabetic at risk foot-A systematic review and meta-analyses.

Authors:  Richard Collings; Jennifer Freeman; Jos M Latour; Joanne Paton
Journal:  Endocrinol Diabetes Metab       Date:  2020-04-11

5.  Effect of tap dance on plantar pressure, postural stability and lower body function in older patients at risk of diabetic foot: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Yanan Zhao; Keshu Cai; Qianwen Wang; Yaqing Hu; Lijun Wei; Huihua Gao
Journal:  BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care       Date:  2021-03

Review 6.  Harnessing Digital Health Technologies to Remotely Manage Diabetic Foot Syndrome: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Bijan Najafi; Ramkinker Mishra
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 2.430

7.  Podiatrist-Delivered Health Coaching to Facilitate the Use of a Smart Insole to Support Foot Health Monitoring in People with Diabetes-Related Peripheral Neuropathy.

Authors:  Emma M Macdonald; Byron M Perrin; Leanne Cleeland; Michael I C Kingsley
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Facilitators and barriers of using digital technology for the management of diabetic foot ulcers: A qualitative systematic review.

Authors:  Hui Foh Foong; Bhone Myint Kyaw; Zee Upton; Lorainne Tudor Car
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2020-05-10       Impact factor: 3.315

9.  Monitoring of Dynamic Plantar Foot Temperatures in Diabetes with Personalised 3D-Printed Wearables.

Authors:  Christopher Beach; Glen Cooper; Andrew Weightman; Emma F Hodson-Tole; Neil D Reeves; Alexander J Casson
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 10.  Patient and Provider Perspective of Smart Wearable Technology in Diabetic Foot Ulcer Prevention: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Giorgio Orlando; Yeliz Prior; Neil D Reeves; Loretta Vileikyte
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 2.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.