Literature DB >> 33322835

Supra-Versus Submaximal Cycle Ergometer Verification of VO2max in Males and Females.

Brandon J Sawyer1, Nicholas McMahon2, Kirsten L Thornhill2, Brett R Baughman2, Jenny M Mahoney1, Kai L Pattison2, Kaitlin A Freeberg2, Ryan T Botts3.   

Abstract

This study was designed to determine the optimal intensity for verification phase testing (VP) in healthy, young adults. Thirty one young, active participants (16 females) completed a cycle ergometer graded exercise test (GXT) VO2max test and 4 VP tests at 80, 90, 100, and 105% of the maximum wattage achieved during the GXT. GXT and VP VO2max values showed a significant test x sex interaction (p = 0.02). The males elicited significantly higher VO2max values during the GXT, 80%, and 90% when compared to the 105%, (105 vs. GXT: p = 0.05; 105% vs. 80%: p < 0.01; 105% vs. 90%: p = 0.02). There were no significant differences in VO2max across the tests in the females (p > 0.05); 80% of the males achieved their highest VP VO2max during a submaximal VP test compared to only 37.5% of the females. A secondary study conducted showed excellent reliability (ICCs > 0.90) and low variation (CVs < 3%) for the 90% VP. Our findings show that a submaximal verification phase intensity is ideal for young healthy males to elicit the highest VO2max during cycle ergometer testing. For females, a range of intensities (80-105%) produce similar VO2max values. However, the 80% VP yields an unnecessarily high time to exhaustion.

Entities:  

Keywords:  criteria for VO2max; incremental exercise testing; maximal oxygen uptake; sex difference; true VO2max

Year:  2020        PMID: 33322835      PMCID: PMC7764640          DOI: 10.3390/sports8120163

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sports (Basel)        ISSN: 2075-4663


  31 in total

1.  Revised Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire.

Authors:  R Adams
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  The relationship between power and the time to achieve .VO(2max).

Authors:  David W Hill; David C Poole; Jimmy C Smith
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 3.  .VO2max: what do we know, and what do we still need to know?

Authors:  Benjamin D Levine
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 4.  Measurement of the maximum oxygen uptake V̇o2max: V̇o2peak is no longer acceptable.

Authors:  David C Poole; Andrew M Jones
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2017-02-02

5.  Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses.

Authors:  Franz Faul; Edgar Erdfelder; Axel Buchner; Albert-Georg Lang
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2009-11

6.  Maximal oxygen uptake as a parametric measure of cardiorespiratory capacity.

Authors:  Megan N Hawkins; Peter B Raven; Peter G Snell; James Stray-Gundersen; Benjamin D Levine
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.411

7.  Metabolic and respiratory profile of the upper limit for prolonged exercise in man.

Authors:  D C Poole; S A Ward; G W Gardner; B J Whipp
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Using a Verification Test for Determination of V[Combining Dot Above]O2max in Sedentary Adults With Obesity.

Authors:  Brandon J Sawyer; Wesley J Tucker; Dharini M Bhammar; Glenn A Gaesser
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.775

9.  No gender-specific differences in mechanical efficiency during arm or leg exercise relative to ventilatory threshold.

Authors:  N Yasuda; S E Gaskill; B C Ruby
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 4.221

10.  Measurement of a True [Formula: see text]O2max during a Ramp Incremental Test Is Not Confirmed by a Verification Phase.

Authors:  Juan M Murias; Silvia Pogliaghi; Donald H Paterson
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 4.566

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.