Literature DB >> 33322792

Transcriptome Analyses Reveal Differential Transcriptional Profiles in Early- and Late-Dividing Porcine Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer Embryos.

Zhiguo Liu1, Guangming Xiang1, Kui Xu1, Jingjing Che1, Changjiang Xu1, Kui Li1, Bingyuan Wang1, Yulian Mu1.   

Abstract

Somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) is not only a valuable tool for understanding nuclear reprogramming, but it also facilitates the generation of genetically modified animals. However, the development of SCNT embryos has remained an uncontrollable process. It was reported that the SCNT embryos that complete the first cell division sooner are more likely to develop to the blastocyst stage, suggesting their better developmental competence. Therefore, to better understand the underlying molecular mechanisms, RNA-seq of pig SCNT embryos that were early-dividing (24 h postactivation) and late-dividing (36 h postactivation) was performed. Our analysis revealed that early- and late-dividing embryos have distinct RNA profiles, and, in all, 3077 genes were differentially expressed. Gene ontology (GO)and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analyses revealed that early-dividing embryos exhibited higher expression in genes that participated in the meiotic cell cycle, while enrichment of RNA processing- and translation-related genes was found in late-dividing embryos. There are also fewer somatic memory genes such as FLRT2, ADAMTS1, and FOXR1, which are abnormally activated or suppressed in early-dividing cloned embryos. These results show that early-dividing SCNT embryos have different transcriptional profiles than late-dividing embryos. Early division of SCNT embryos may be associated with their better reprogramming capacity, and somatic memory genes may act as a reprogramming barrier in pig SCNT reprogramming.

Entities:  

Keywords:  RNA-seq; embryo development; gene expression; pig; somatic cell nuclear transfer

Year:  2020        PMID: 33322792      PMCID: PMC7763450          DOI: 10.3390/genes11121499

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes (Basel)        ISSN: 2073-4425            Impact factor:   4.096


  32 in total

1.  Early embryo cleavage is a strong indicator of embryo quality in human IVF.

Authors:  K Lundin; C Bergh; T Hardarson
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  Production of cloned pigs by using somatic cells as donors.

Authors:  Liangxue Lai; Randall S Prather
Journal:  Cloning Stem Cells       Date:  2003

3.  Effect of the timing of the first cleavage on the developmental potential of nuclear-transferred mouse oocytes receiving embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  T Kobayashi; Y Kato; Y Tsunoda
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 2.740

4.  Early cleavages influence the molecular and the metabolic pattern of individually cultured bovine blastocysts.

Authors:  Marcella Pecora Milazzotto; Marcelo Demarchi Goissis; James Lee Chitwood; Kelly Annes; Carlos Alexandre Soares; Jéssica Ispada; Mayra Elena Ortiz Ávila Assumpção; Pablo Juan Ross
Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 2.609

5.  STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner.

Authors:  Alexander Dobin; Carrie A Davis; Felix Schlesinger; Jorg Drenkow; Chris Zaleski; Sonali Jha; Philippe Batut; Mark Chaisson; Thomas R Gingeras
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  Relationship between time of first cleavage and the expression of IGF-I growth factor, its receptor, and two housekeeping genes in bovine two-cell embryos and blastocysts produced in vitro.

Authors:  P Lonergan; A Gutiérrez-Adán; B Pintado; T Fair; F Ward; J D Fuente; M Boland
Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.609

7.  Timing of the First Cleavage and In Vitro Developmental Potential of Bovine Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer Embryos Activated by Different Protocols.

Authors:  Satoshi Akagi; Shinnosuke Tamura; Kazutsugu Matsukawa
Journal:  Cell Reprogram       Date:  2019-12-31       Impact factor: 1.987

8.  Analysis of mRNA abundance for histone variants, histone- and DNA-modifiers in bovine in vivo and in vitro oocytes and embryos.

Authors:  J Duan; L Zhu; H Dong; X Zheng; Z Jiang; J Chen; X C Tian
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  WebGestalt 2019: gene set analysis toolkit with revamped UIs and APIs.

Authors:  Yuxing Liao; Jing Wang; Eric J Jaehnig; Zhiao Shi; Bing Zhang
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 10.  Epigenetic Reprogramming During Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer: Recent Progress and Future Directions.

Authors:  Xiangyu Wang; Jiadan Qu; Jie Li; Hongbin He; Zhonghua Liu; Yanjun Huan
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 4.599

View more
  3 in total

1.  Enhancement of Chromatin and Epigenetic Reprogramming in Porcine SCNT Embryos-Progresses and Perspectives.

Authors:  Werner Giehl Glanzner; Mariana Priotto de Macedo; Karina Gutierrez; Vilceu Bordignon
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-07-11

2.  RNA-Seq Reveals the Underlying Molecular Mechanism of First Cleavage Time Affecting Porcine Embryo Development.

Authors:  Xinhui Song; Tiantian Li; Xin Xiong; Huiquan Shan; Tong Feng; Kuiqing Cui; Deshun Shi; Qingyou Liu; Zhipeng Li
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 4.141

Review 3.  Epigenetic manipulation to improve mouse SCNT embryonic development.

Authors:  Yamei Li; Qiang Sun
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 4.772

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.