Literature DB >> 33322616

Comparison between Additive and Subtractive CAD-CAM Technique to Produce Orthognathic Surgical Splints: A Personalized Approach.

Giuseppe Palazzo1, Vincenzo Ronsivalle1, Giacomo Oteri2, Antonino Lo Giudice1, Corrado Toro1, Paola Campagna1, Romeo Patini3, Salvatore Bocchieri1, Alberto Bianchi1, Gaetano Isola1.   

Abstract

The present study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of digitally designed surgical splints generated with milling technology (material subtractive procedure) and with 3D printing technology (material additive procedure) through a customized approach in the planning of surgical orthognathic splints. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) examinations and scanned dental models of 10 subjects who had required surgical treatment of skeletal malocclusion were included. Simulation of the orthognathic surgery was performed according to dento-skeletal and aesthetic characteristics of the subjects and the visual treatment objective (VTO), using Dolphin3D software (Dolphin Imaging, version 11.0, Chatsworth, CA, USA). Afterward, the Appliance Designer software (3Shape A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark) was used to digitally design the surgical splints that were generated twice using laser stereolithography technology (DWS 0.29D, DWS, Vicenza, Italy) and milling technology (Sirona inLab MC X5). Finally, each physical splint was digitalized using a desktop scanner (D500 3D, 3Shape A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark) in order to perform deviation analysis using the original project as a reference. The relative percentage of matching (trueness) was calculated (Geomagic Control X software (3D Systems, version 2018.1.1, 3D Systems, Rock Hill, SC, USA). An Independent Student's t-test was used to statistically analyze the data. The milled splints showed a lower value of root to mean square (RMS) relative to the original project (0.20 mm ± 0.018) compared to the prototyped splints (0.31 ± 0.021) (p < 0.001). According to the present findings, surgical splints generated with milling technology present higher trueness compared with 3D printing technology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printing; dental materials; milling technology; prototyping; splints

Year:  2020        PMID: 33322616      PMCID: PMC7768501          DOI: 10.3390/jpm10040273

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Med        ISSN: 2075-4426


  32 in total

1.  Accurate pre-surgical determination for self-drilling miniscrew implant placement using surgical guides and cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Ken Miyazawa; Misuzu Kawaguchi; Masako Tabuchi; Shigemi Goto
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Bimaxillary surgery using an intermediate splint to position the maxilla.

Authors:  E Ellis
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 1.895

3.  Evaluation of pulp cavity/chamber changes after tooth-borne and bone-borne rapid maxillary expansions: a CBCT study using surface-based superimposition and deviation analysis.

Authors:  Antonino Lo Giudice; Rosalia Leonardi; Vincenzo Ronsivalle; Silvia Allegrini; Manuel Lagravère; Giuseppe Marzo; Gaetano Isola
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-08-29       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Immunolocalization of lubricin in the rat periodontal ligament during experimental tooth movement.

Authors:  Rosalia Leonardi; Carla Loreto; Nabeel Talic; Rosario Caltabiano; Giuseppe Musumeci
Journal:  Acta Histochem       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 2.479

5.  Three-dimensional comparative study on the accuracy and reproducibility of dental casts fabricated by 3D printers.

Authors:  Mid-Eum Park; Soo-Yeon Shin
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 3.426

6.  Manufacturing splints for orthognathic surgery using a three-dimensional printer.

Authors:  Marc Christian Metzger; Bettina Hohlweg-Majert; Uli Schwarz; Matthias Teschner; Beat Hammer; Rainer Schmelzeisen
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2008-02

7.  Clinical feasibility of computer-aided surgical simulation (CASS) in the treatment of complex cranio-maxillofacial deformities.

Authors:  Jaime Gateno; James J Xia; John F Teichgraeber; Andrew M Christensen; Jeremy J Lemoine; Michael A K Liebschner; Michael J Gliddon; Michaelanne E Briggs
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.895

8.  The step further smile virtual planning: milled versus prototyped mock-ups for the evaluation of the designed smile characteristics.

Authors:  Antonino Lo Giudice; Luca Ortensi; Marco Farronato; Alessandra Lucchese; Erica Lo Castro; Gaetano Isola
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 2.757

9.  Accuracy evaluation of dental models manufactured by CAD/CAM milling method and 3D printing method.

Authors:  Yoo-Geum Jeong; Wan-Sun Lee; Kyu-Bok Lee
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 1.904

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Main Applications and Recent Research Progresses of Additive Manufacturing in Dentistry.

Authors:  Gan Huang; Libo Wu; Jie Hu; Xiongming Zhou; Fei He; Li Wan; Shu-Ting Pan
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 3.411

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.