Literature DB >> 33322100

In Vitro Tests of FDM 3D-Printed Diclofenac Sodium-Containing Implants.

Petra Arany1,2, Ildikó Papp3, Marianna Zichar3, Máté Csontos4, János Elek5, Géza Regdon6, István Budai7, Mónika Béres8, Rudolf Gesztelyi9, Pálma Fehér1, Zoltán Ujhelyi1, Gábor Vasvári1, Ádám Haimhoffer1, Ferenc Fenyvesi1, Judit Váradi1, Vecsernyés Miklós1, Ildikó Bácskay1.   

Abstract

One of the most promising emerging innovations in personalized medication is based on 3D printing technology. For use as authorized medications, 3D-printed products require different in vitro tests, including dissolution and biocompatibility investigations. Our objective was to manufacture implantable drug delivery systems using fused deposition modeling, and in vitro tests were performed for the assessment of these products. Polylactic acid, antibacterial polylactic acid, polyethylene terephthalate glycol, and poly(methyl methacrylate) filaments were selected, and samples with 16, 19, or 22 mm diameters and 0%, 5%, 10%, or 15% infill percentages were produced. The dissolution test was performed by a USP dissolution apparatus 1. A 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide dye (MTT)-based prolonged cytotoxicity test was performed on Caco-2 cells to certify the cytocompatibility properties. The implantable drug delivery systems were characterized by thermogravimetric and heatflow assay, contact angle measurement, scanning electron microscopy, microcomputed tomography, and Raman spectroscopy. Based on our results, it can be stated that the samples are considered nontoxic. The dissolution profiles are influenced by the material properties of the polymers, the diameter, and the infill percentage. Our results confirm the potential of fused deposition modeling (FDM) 3D printing for the manufacturing of different implantable drug delivery systems in personalized medicine and may be applied during surgical interventions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printing; FDM; cytotoxicity; dissolution tests; implants; personalized medicine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33322100      PMCID: PMC7764218          DOI: 10.3390/molecules25245889

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Molecules        ISSN: 1420-3049            Impact factor:   4.411


  65 in total

Review 1.  Kinetic modeling on drug release from controlled drug delivery systems.

Authors:  Suvakanta Dash; Padala Narasimha Murthy; Lilakanta Nath; Prasanta Chowdhury
Journal:  Acta Pol Pharm       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 0.330

2.  Structural and mechanical implications of PMMA implant shape and interface geometry in cranioplasty--A finite element study.

Authors:  Angela Ridwan-Pramana; Petr Marcián; Libor Borák; Nathaniel Narra; Tim Forouzanfar; Jan Wolff
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  Quantitative determination of diclofenac sodium in solid dosage forms by FT-Raman spectroscopy.

Authors:  Sylwester Mazurek; Roman Szostak
Journal:  J Pharm Biomed Anal       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 3.935

4.  Fused-filament 3D printing (3DP) for fabrication of tablets.

Authors:  Alvaro Goyanes; Asma B M Buanz; Abdul W Basit; Simon Gaisford
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 5.875

5.  3D printed multi-compartment capsular devices for two-pulse oral drug delivery.

Authors:  A Maroni; A Melocchi; F Parietti; A Foppoli; L Zema; A Gazzaniga
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 9.776

6.  Biocompatibility investigation of different pharmaceutical excipients used in liquid dosage forms.

Authors:  D Nemes; Z Ujhelyi; P Arany; A Pető; P Fehér; J Váradi; F Fenyvesi; M Vecsernyés; I Bácskay
Journal:  Pharmazie       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 1.267

7.  Anti-infective efficacy, cytocompatibility and biocompatibility of a 3D-printed osteoconductive composite scaffold functionalized with quaternized chitosan.

Authors:  Ying Yang; Shengbing Yang; Yugang Wang; Zhifeng Yu; Haiyong Ao; Hongbo Zhang; Ling Qin; Olivier Guillaume; David Eglin; R Geoff Richards; Tingting Tang
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 8.947

8.  Limitations of the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay when compared to three commonly used cell enumeration assays.

Authors:  Alet van Tonder; Annie M Joubert; A Duncan Cromarty
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2015-02-20

9.  Evaluation of the Release Kinetics of a Pharmacologically Active Substance from Model Intra-Articular Implants Replacing the Cruciate Ligaments of the Knee.

Authors:  Dorota Wojcik-Pastuszka; Justyna Krzak; Bartosz Macikowski; Ryszard Berkowski; Bogdan Osiński; Witold Musiał
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 3.623

10.  Preparation of Chitin-PLA laminated composite for implantable application.

Authors:  Romana Nasrin; Shanta Biswas; Taslim Ur Rashid; Sanjida Afrin; Rumana Akhter Jahan; Papia Haque; Mohammed Mizanur Rahman
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2017-10-02
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  The Evolution of the 3D-Printed Drug Delivery Systems: A Review.

Authors:  Ildikó Bácskay; Zoltán Ujhelyi; Pálma Fehér; Petra Arany
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 6.525

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.