Literature DB >> 33322096

Repertoires of Vaccine Refusal in Romania.

Cosmin Toth1.   

Abstract

Repertoires are basic analytic units in discourse analysis and discursive psychology, characterized as repeatable building blocks speakers use for constructing versions of actions. In this study my aim is to analyze public repertoires which are available to parents as discursive resources to substantiate their decision not to vaccinate their children. Online content, two televised talk shows and a series of interviews with parents who refused vaccination from 2017-2019 were analyzed. As a result of this analysis, I have identified a series of repertoires such as distrust repertoires, rejecting any risks when it comes to children, vaccine ineffectiveness and 'immunity is a limited resource that should not be forced'. These repertoires do a discursive work that seem to go beyond signs of concern or challenges to vaccine safety to perform a moral and epistemic delegitimization of the current system of medical services, medical research and government authorities. Moreover, the identification of the repertoires that circulate in the public space as resources fulfil a discursive function of replacing the current system with new moral and epistemic perspectives.

Entities:  

Keywords:  discourse analysis; interpretive repertoires; refusal of vaccination

Year:  2020        PMID: 33322096      PMCID: PMC7768394          DOI: 10.3390/vaccines8040757

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)        ISSN: 2076-393X


  11 in total

1.  The influence of vaccine-critical websites on perceiving vaccination risks.

Authors:  Cornelia Betsch; Frank Renkewitz; Tilmann Betsch; Corina Ulshöfer
Journal:  J Health Psychol       Date:  2010-04

2.  Anti-vaccination movements and their interpretations.

Authors:  Stuart Blume
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2005-07-21       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Parents' vaccination comprehension and decisions.

Authors:  Julie S Downs; Wändi Bruine de Bruin; Baruch Fischhoff
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 3.641

4.  "Nature Does Things Well, Why Should We Interfere?": Vaccine Hesitancy Among Mothers.

Authors:  Eve Dubé; Maryline Vivion; Chantal Sauvageau; Arnaud Gagneur; Raymonde Gagnon; Maryse Guay
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2015-02-23

5.  "Everybody just wants to do what's best for their child": Understanding how pro-vaccine parents can support a culture of vaccine hesitancy.

Authors:  Eileen Wang; Yelena Baras; Alison M Buttenheim
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 6.  The benefit of the doubt or doubts over benefits? A systematic literature review of perceived risks of vaccines in European populations.

Authors:  Emilie Karafillakis; Heidi J Larson
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2017-07-29       Impact factor: 3.641

7.  A meta-synthesis study of the key elements involved in childhood vaccine hesitancy.

Authors:  M E Díaz Crescitelli; L Ghirotto; H Sisson; L Sarli; G Artioli; M C Bassi; G Appicciutoli; M Hayter
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 2.427

Review 8.  Attitudes to vaccination: a critical review.

Authors:  Ohid Yaqub; Sophie Castle-Clarke; Nick Sevdalis; Joanna Chataway
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  The defining characteristics of Web 2.0 and their potential influence in the online vaccination debate.

Authors:  Holly O Witteman; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 3.641

10.  Anti-vaccine activists, Web 2.0, and the postmodern paradigm--an overview of tactics and tropes used online by the anti-vaccination movement.

Authors:  Anna Kata
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 3.641

View more
  1 in total

1.  Prevention and management of adverse events following COVID-19 vaccination using traditional Korean medicine: An online survey of public health doctors.

Authors:  Byungsoo Kang; Hongmin Chu; Bo-Young Youn; Jungtae Leem
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 1.534

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.