Literature DB >> 33321904

The Effect of Spinal Manipulation on the Electrophysiological and Metabolic Properties of the Tibialis Anterior Muscle.

Imran Khan Niazi1,2,3, Ernest Nlandu Kamavuako4,5, Kelly Holt1, Taha Al Muhammadee Janjua3, Nitika Kumari1,2, Imran Amjad1,6, Heidi Haavik1.   

Abstract

There is growing evidence showing that spinal manipulation increases muscle strength in healthy individuals as well as in people with some musculoskeletal and neurological disorders. However, the underlying mechanism by which spinal manipulation changes muscle strength is less clear. This study aimed to assess the effects of a single spinal manipulation session on the electrophysiological and metabolic properties of the tibialis anterior (TA) muscle. Maximum voluntary contractions (MVC) of the ankle dorsiflexors, high-density electromyography (HDsEMG), intramuscular EMG, and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) were recorded from the TA muscle in 25 participants with low level recurring spinal dysfunction using a randomized controlled crossover design. The following outcomes: motor unit discharge rate (MUDR), strength (force at MVC), muscle conduction velocity (CV), relative changes in oxy- and deoxyhemoglobin were assessed pre and post a spinal manipulation intervention and passive movement control. Repeated measures ANOVA was used to assess within and between-group differences. Following the spinal manipulation intervention, there was a significant increase in MVC (p = 0.02; avg 18.87 ± 28.35%) and a significant increase in CV in both the isometric steady-state (10% of MVC) contractions (p < 0.01; avg 22.11 ± 11.69%) and during the isometric ramp (10% of MVC) contractions (p < 0.01; avg 4.52 ± 4.58%) compared to the control intervention. There were no other significant findings. The observed TA strength and CV increase, without changes in MUDR, suggests that the strength changes observed following spinal manipulation are, in part, due to increased recruitment of larger, higher threshold motor units. Further research needs to investigate the longer term and potential functional effects of spinal manipulation in various patients who may benefit from improved muscle function and greater motor unit recruitment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  conduction velocity; maximum voluntary contraction; near-infrared spectroscopy; spinal manipulation

Year:  2020        PMID: 33321904      PMCID: PMC7764559          DOI: 10.3390/healthcare8040548

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)        ISSN: 2227-9032


  73 in total

1.  Neural adaptation to resistance training: changes in evoked V-wave and H-reflex responses.

Authors:  Per Aagaard; Erik B Simonsen; Jesper L Andersen; Peter Magnusson; Poul Dyhre-Poulsen
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2002-06

2.  Mental movement simulation affects the N30 frontal component of the somatosensory evoked potential.

Authors:  G Cheron; S Borenstein
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1992 May-Jun

Review 3.  AAEM Minimonograph #13: H reflexes and F waves: physiology and clinical indications.

Authors:  M A Fisher
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.217

Review 4.  The role of spinal manipulation in addressing disordered sensorimotor integration and altered motor control.

Authors:  Heidi Haavik; Bernadette Murphy
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 2.368

Review 5.  The use of muscle near-infrared spectroscopy in sport, health and medical sciences: recent developments.

Authors:  Takafumi Hamaoka; Kevin K McCully; Masatsugu Niwayama; Britton Chance
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Adjustments in motor unit properties during fatiguing contractions after training.

Authors:  Carolina Vila-Chã; Deborah Falla; Miguel Velhote Correia; Dario Farina
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 7.  Corticospinal responses following strength training: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dawson J Kidgell; Daniel R Bonanno; Ashlyn K Frazer; Glyn Howatson; Alan J Pearce
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 3.386

8.  Non-cephalic reference recording of early somatosensory potentials to finger stimulation in adult or aging normal man: differentiation of widespread N18 and contralateral N20 from the prerolandic P22 and N30 components.

Authors:  J E Desmedt; G Cheron
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1981-12

9.  A review of the H-reflex and M-wave in the human triceps surae.

Authors:  Kylie J Tucker; Meltem Tuncer; Kemal S Türker
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2005-12-06       Impact factor: 2.161

10.  Manipulation of Dysfunctional Spinal Joints Affects Sensorimotor Integration in the Prefrontal Cortex: A Brain Source Localization Study.

Authors:  Dina Lelic; Imran Khan Niazi; Kelly Holt; Mads Jochumsen; Kim Dremstrup; Paul Yielder; Bernadette Murphy; Asbjørn Mohr Drewes; Heidi Haavik
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 3.599

View more
  4 in total

1.  An Essential Guide to Chiropractic in the United States Military Health System and Veterans Health Administration.

Authors:  Bart N Green; Andrew S Dunn
Journal:  J Chiropr Humanit       Date:  2021-12-22

2.  The Effects of Spinal Manipulation on Motor Unit Behavior.

Authors:  Lucien Robinault; Aleš Holobar; Sylvain Crémoux; Usman Rashid; Imran Khan Niazi; Kelly Holt; Jimmy Lauber; Heidi Haavik
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-01-14

3.  Chiropractic Spinal Adjustment Increases the Cortical Drive to the Lower Limb Muscle in Chronic Stroke Patients.

Authors:  Muhammad Samran Navid; Imran Khan Niazi; Dina Lelic; Imran Amjad; Nitika Kumari; Muhammad Shafique; Kelly Holt; Usman Rashid; Asbjørn Mohr Drewes; Heidi Haavik
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 4.  The contemporary model of vertebral column joint dysfunction and impact of high-velocity, low-amplitude controlled vertebral thrusts on neuromuscular function.

Authors:  Heidi Haavik; Nitika Kumari; Kelly Holt; Imran Khan Niazi; Imran Amjad; Amit N Pujari; Kemal Sitki Türker; Bernadette Murphy
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 3.078

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.