Literature DB >> 33321484

Effect of microdistribution of alpha and beta-emitters in targeted radionuclide therapies on delivered absorbed dose in a GATE model of bone marrow.

Jonathan Tranel1, Felix Y Feng2,3, Sara St James2, Thomas A Hope1,3.   

Abstract

Acute hematologic toxicity is a frequent adverse effect of beta-emitter targeted radionuclide therapies (TRTs). Alpha emitters have the potential of delivering high linear energy transfer (LET) radiation to the tumor attributed to its shorter range. Antibody-based TRTs have increased blood-pool half-lives, and therefore increased marrow toxicity, which is a particular concern with alpha emitters. Accurate 3D absorbed dose calculations focusing on the interface region of blood vessels and bone can elucidate energy deposition patterns. Firstly, a cylindrical geometry model with a central blood vessel embedded in the trabecular tissue was modeled. Monte Carlo simulations in GATE were performed considering beta (177Lu, 90Y) and alpha emitters (211At, 225Ac) as sources restricted to the blood pool. Subsequently, the radioactive sources were added in the trabecular bone compartment in order to model bone marrow metastases infiltration (BMMI). Radial profiles, dose-volume histograms and voxel relative differences were used to evaluate the absorbed dose results. We demonstrated that alpha emitters have a higher localized energy deposition compared to beta emitters. In the cylindrical geometry model, when the sources are confined to the blood pool, the dose to the trabecular bone is greater for beta emitting radionuclides, as alpha emitters deposit the majority of their energy within 70 μm of the vessel wall. In the BMMI model, alpha emitters have a lower dose to untargeted trabecular bone. Our results suggest that when alpha emitters are restricted to the blood pool, as when labeled to antibodies, hematologic toxicities may be lower than expected due to differences in the microdistribution of delivered absorbed dose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33321484      PMCID: PMC7880907          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/abd3ef

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  24 in total

1.  Targeting of osseous sites with alpha-emitting 223Ra: comparison with the beta-emitter 89Sr in mice.

Authors:  Gjermund Henriksen; Darrell R Fisher; John C Roeske; Øyvind S Bruland; Roy H Larsen
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  225Ac-PSMA-617 for PSMA-Targeted α-Radiation Therapy of Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Clemens Kratochwil; Frank Bruchertseifer; Frederik L Giesel; Mirjam Weis; Frederik A Verburg; Felix Mottaghy; Klaus Kopka; Christos Apostolidis; Uwe Haberkorn; Alfred Morgenstern
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 3.  The promise of targeted {alpha}-particle therapy.

Authors:  Deborah A Mulford; David A Scheinberg; Joseph G Jurcic
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  A technique for the quantitative evaluation of dose distributions.

Authors:  D A Low; W B Harms; S Mutic; J A Purdy
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 5.  A review of the use and potential of the GATE Monte Carlo simulation code for radiation therapy and dosimetry applications.

Authors:  David Sarrut; Manuel Bardiès; Nicolas Boussion; Nicolas Freud; Sébastien Jan; Jean-Michel Létang; George Loudos; Lydia Maigne; Sara Marcatili; Thibault Mauxion; Panagiotis Papadimitroulas; Yann Perrot; Uwe Pietrzyk; Charlotte Robert; Dennis R Schaart; Dimitris Visvikis; Irène Buvat
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  A cell-based dosimetry model for radium-223 dichloride therapy using bone micro-CT images and GATE simulations.

Authors:  Gabriella M Pinto; Daniel A B Bonifacio; Lidia V de Sá; Luis Felipe C Lima; Igor F Vieira; Ricardo T Lopes
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  A bone marrow toxicity model for ²²³Ra alpha-emitter radiopharmaceutical therapy.

Authors:  Robert F Hobbs; Hong Song; Christopher J Watchman; Wesley E Bolch; Anne-Kirsti Aksnes; Thomas Ramdahl; Glenn D Flux; George Sgouros
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Phase II study of Lutetium-177-labeled anti-prostate-specific membrane antigen monoclonal antibody J591 for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Scott T Tagawa; Matthew I Milowsky; Michael Morris; Shankar Vallabhajosula; Paul Christos; Naveed H Akhtar; Joseph Osborne; Stanley J Goldsmith; Steve Larson; Neeta Pandit Taskar; Howard I Scher; Neil H Bander; David M Nanus
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 9.  Molecular targeted α-particle therapy for oncologic applications.

Authors:  Thaddeus J Wadas; Darpan N Pandya; Kiran Kumar Solingapuram Sai; Akiva Mintz
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 10.  The potential and hurdles of targeted alpha therapy - clinical trials and beyond.

Authors:  Jörgen Elgqvist; Sofia Frost; Jean-Pierre Pouget; Per Albertsson
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 6.244

View more
  2 in total

1.  Impact of radiopharmaceutical therapy (177Lu, 225Ac) microdistribution in a cancer-associated fibroblasts model.

Authors:  Jonathan Tranel; Stig Palm; Stephen A Graves; Felix Y Feng; Thomas A Hope
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2022-09-30

Review 2.  Global experience with PSMA-based alpha therapy in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Mike M Sathekge; Frank Bruchertseifer; Mariza Vorster; Alfred Morgenstern; Ismaheel O Lawal
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 9.236

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.