Literature DB >> 33321385

A psychoacoustic test for diagnosing hyperacusis based on ratings of natural sounds.

Falco Enzler1, Philippe Fournier1, Arnaud J Noreña2.   

Abstract

Hyperacusis is defined as an increased sensitivity to sounds, i.e. sounds presented at moderate levels can produce discomfort or even pain. Existing diagnostic methods, like the Hyperacusis Questionnaire (HQ) and Loudness Discomfort Levels (LDLs), have been challenged because of their variability and lack of agreement on appropriate cut-off values. We propose a novel approach by using psychoacoustic ratings of natural sounds as an assessment tool for hyperacusis. Subjects (n = 81) were presented with natural and artificial (tone pips, noises) sounds (n = 69) in a controlled environment at four sound levels (60, 70, 80 and 90 dB SPL). The task was to rate them on a pleasant to unpleasant visual analog scale. The inherent challenge of this study was to create a new diagnostic tool when no gold standard of hyperacusis diagnosis exists. We labeled our subjects as hyperacusic (n = 26) when they were diagnosed as such by at least two of three methods (HQ, LDLs and self-report). There was a significant difference between controls (n = 23) and hyperacusics in the median global rating of pleasant sounds. Median global ratings of unpleasant sounds and artificial sounds did not differ significantly. Then we selected the subset of sounds that could best discriminate the controls from the hyperacusics, the Core Discriminant Sounds (CDS), and we used them to develop a new metric: The CDS score. A normalized global score and a score for each sound level can be computed with respect to a control population without hyperacusis. A receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that the accuracy of our method in distinguishing subjects with and without complaints of hyperacusis (86%, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 76-93%) is comparable to that of existing methods such as the LDL (77%, CI: 67-86%) and the HQ (80%, CI: 69-88%). We believe that the CDS score is more relevant to subject's complaints than LDLs and that it could be applied in a clinical environment in a fast and effective way, while minimizing discomfort and biases.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diagnostic test; Hyperacusis; Natural sounds; Psychoacoustics; Receiver Operating Characteristic; Unpleasantness rating

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33321385     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2020.108124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  6 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation and Management of Misophonia Using a Hybrid Telecare Approach: A Case Report.

Authors:  Lori Zitelli
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2021-08-02

Review 2.  Clinical and investigational tools for monitoring noise-induced hyperacusis.

Authors:  Kelly N Jahn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 2.482

3.  Audiological and Other Factors Predicting the Presence of Misophonia Symptoms Among a Clinical Population Seeking Help for Tinnitus and/or Hyperacusis.

Authors:  Hashir Aazh; Mercede Erfanian; Ali A Danesh; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 5.152

4.  A Multidimensional Investigation of Sensory Processing in Autism: Parent- and Self-Report Questionnaires, Psychophysical Thresholds, and Event-Related Potentials in the Auditory and Somatosensory Modalities.

Authors:  Patrick Dwyer; Yukari Takarae; Iman Zadeh; Susan M Rivera; Clifford D Saron
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 3.473

5.  The Impact of Occupational Noise Exposure on Hyperacusis: a Longitudinal Population Study of Female Workers in Sweden.

Authors:  Sofie Fredriksson; Laith Hussain-Alkhateeb; Kjell Torén; Mattias Sjöström; Jenny Selander; Per Gustavsson; Kim Kähäri; Lennart Magnusson; Kerstin Persson Waye
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 3.562

Review 6.  Multidisciplinary Tinnitus Research: Challenges and Future Directions From the Perspective of Early Stage Researchers.

Authors:  Jorge Piano Simoes; Elza Daoud; Maryam Shabbir; Sana Amanat; Kelly Assouly; Roshni Biswas; Chiara Casolani; Albi Dode; Falco Enzler; Laure Jacquemin; Mie Joergensen; Tori Kok; Nuwan Liyanage; Matheus Lourenco; Punitkumar Makani; Muntazir Mehdi; Anissa L Ramadhani; Constanze Riha; Jose Lopez Santacruz; Axel Schiller; Stefan Schoisswohl; Natalia Trpchevska; Eleni Genitsaridi
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 5.750

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.