| Literature DB >> 33321138 |
Monica R Swinney1, Amy L Cox2, Eric D Hawkins2, Jie Xue2, Parag Garhyan2, James R L Stanley3, Shantanu V Sule2, Kofi Adragni2, M Dodson Michael2.
Abstract
Insulin infusion sets worn for more than 4-5 days have been associated with a greater risk of unexplained hyperglycemia, a phenomenon that has been hypothesized to be caused by an inflammatory response to preservatives such as m-cresol and phenol. In this cross-over study in diabetic swine, we examined the role of the preservative m-cresol in inflammation and changes in infusion site patency. Insulin pharmacokinetics (PK) and glucose pharmacodynamics (PD) were measured on delivery of a bolus of regular human insulin U-100 (U-100R), formulated with or without 2.5 mg/mL m-cresol, to fasted swine following 0, 3, 5, 7, and 10 days of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII). In a subsequent study with the same animals, biopsies were evaluated from swine wearing infusion sets infusing nothing, saline, or U-100R either with or without 2.5 mg/mL m-cresol, following 3, 7, and 10 days of CSII. Exposure to m-cresol did not impact any PK or PD endpoints. PK and PD responses dropped markedly from Days 7-10, regardless of the presence of m-cresol. Histopathology results suggest an additive inflammatory response to both the infusion set and the insulin protein itself, peaking at Day 7 and remaining stable beyond.Entities:
Keywords: Bioavailability; Formulation; Injectable; Insulin; Peptide; Peptide delivery; Pharmacodynamics; Pharmacokinetics; Protein delivery; Protein formulation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33321138 DOI: 10.1016/j.xphs.2020.12.008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Pharm Sci ISSN: 0022-3549 Impact factor: 3.534