| Literature DB >> 33320920 |
Wei Yuan1, Shuying Gong2, Yimin Han2.
Abstract
Under the backdrop of China's aging population and continuous rising housing price and base on theories pertaining to social status seeking, marriage matching and intergenerational family relationships, use the 2010 and 2014 CFPS national survey micro data, we examine the impact of rising housing price on the health of middle-aged and elderly people and the underlying mechanisms. Rising housing price has a significant negative impact on the health of middle-aged and elderly people, and this effect is also reflected in their physical health, mental acuity and emotional well-being. The internal mechanism is that social status seeking motivation plays a significant mediator role. Through further analysis, we find that competitive saving motive is another intermediate mechanism that causes rising housing price to affect the health of middle-aged and elderly people; it is complementary to the social status seeking motivation. What's more, the mediation effect of the competitive saving motive is notably heterogeneous, as it exists only for middle-aged and elderly people with male or noncollege educated child but does not exist for those with female or college educated child.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33320920 PMCID: PMC7737984 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243982
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Descriptive statistics.
| Variable | Observation | Mean | S.D. | Min | Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dependent Variables | |||||
| Physical Health | 86580 | 0.856 | 0.351 | 0 | 1 |
| Mental Acuity | 86580 | 0.751 | 0.432 | 0 | 1 |
| Emotional Well-Being | 41431 | 4.328 | 0.841 | 1 | 5 |
| Independent Variable | |||||
| Rising Housing Price | 86580 | 3.122 | 0.640 | 0.693 | 4.001 |
| Mediator Variable | |||||
| Social Status Seeking Motivation | 39446 | 2.751 | 2.115 | 0.2 | 10 |
| Control Variables: Individual Level | |||||
| Gender (Male = 1) | 44085 | 0.493 | 0.500 | 0 | 1 |
| Age | 44066 | 56.138 | 11.411 | 40 | 110 |
| Years of Education | 59230 | 5.189 | 4.848 | 0 | 22 |
| Marital Status (Married = 1) | 39019 | 0.982 | 0.132 | 0 | 1 |
| Non-agricultural Population (Yes = 1) | 43.586 | 0.289 | 0.453 | 0 | 1 |
| Smoking (Yes = 1) | 86580 | 0.330 | 0.470 | 0 | 1 |
| Exercise (Yes = 1) | 86580 | 0.668 | 0.471 | 0 | 1 |
| Endowment Insurance (Yes = 1) | 44085 | 0.337 | 0.477 | 0 | 1 |
| Medicare (Yes = 1) | 43650 | 0.883 | 0.322 | 0 | 1 |
| Control Variables: Family Level | |||||
| Log of Per Capita Income | 73337 | 8.611 | 1.478 | 0.405 | 11.124 |
| Housing Ownership (Yes = 1) | 86580 | 0.955 | 0.207 | 0 | 1 |
| Urban Population (Yes = 1) | 85493 | 0.434 | 0.496 | 0 | 1 |
| Whether the Household Uses Tap Water (Yes = 1) | 78330 | 0.594 | 0.491 | 0 | 1 |
| Type of Fuel Used | 78331 | 2.673 | 1.757 | 1 | 7 |
| Household Power Used | 78323 | 3.505 | 0.587 | 1 | 4 |
| Control Variables: Child Level | |||||
| Child’s Gender (Male = 1) | 37346 | 0.615 | 0.487 | 0 | 1 |
| Child’s Age | 37173 | 29.334 | 11.034 | 0 | 77 |
| Child’s Years of Education | 36062 | 8.676 | 4.248 | 0 | 22 |
| Child’s Marital Status (Married = 1) | 37353 | 0.562 | 0.496 | 0 | 1 |
| Control Variables: City Level | |||||
| Municipality (Yes = 1) | 86580 | 0.093 | 0.29 | 0 | 1 |
| Eastern area (Yes = 1) | 86580 | 0.413 | 0.492 | 0 | 1 |
The effects of rising housing price on the health of middle-aged and elderly people.
| Dependent Variable | Physical Health | Mental Acuity | Emotional Well-Being | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | ||||||
| Column | (1) | (2) | (3) | |||
| Rising Housing Price | -0.575*** | (0.014) | -0.198*** | (0.012) | -0.092*** | (0.007) |
| Age | -0.020*** | (0.001) | -0.011*** | (0.001) | 0.002*** | (0.001) |
| Gender | 0.213*** | (0.019) | 0.063*** | (0.018) | 0.140*** | (0.012) |
| Years of Education | 0.030*** | (0.002) | 0.045*** | (0.002) | 0.011*** | (0.001) |
| Marital Status | 0.303*** | (0.055) | 0.098* | (0.054) | 0.172*** | (0.035) |
| Non-agricultural Population | 0.010*** | (0.021) | 0.156*** | (0.019) | 0.015 | (0.012) |
| Smoking | -0.036* | (0.020) | -0.208*** | (0.018) | 0.016 | (0.012) |
| Exercise | 0.022 | (0.017) | 0.197*** | (0.016) | 0.036*** | (0.010) |
| Insurance | -0.061*** | (0.017) | -0.047*** | (0.016) | 0.001 | (0.010) |
| Medicare | -0.041 | (0.025) | 0.078*** | (0.022) | 0.067*** | (0.014) |
| Per Capita Income | 0.026*** | (0.006) | 0.056*** | (0.005) | 0.030*** | (0.003) |
| Housing Ownership | -0.006 | (0.041) | 0.056 | (0.035) | 0.049** | (0.022) |
| _Cons | 2.807*** | (0.096) | 0.231*** | (0.087) | 3.776*** | (0.056) |
| Province Dummy | Yes | Yes | Yes | |||
| 0.095 | 0.068 | 0.031 | ||||
| Observation | 34442 | 34442 | 33147 | |||
Notes: 1. The results reported in column (1) and column (2) are only the original estimation coefficient, not the marginal effect. 2. The value in parentheses is the standard error. 3.***, **, * represent 1%, 5%, and 10% significance levels.
The mediation effect results based on causal step regression analysis.
| Dependent Variable | Physical Health | Social Status Seeking Motivation | Physical Health | Mental Acuity | Social Status Seeking Motivation | Mental Acuity | Emotional Well-Being | Social Status Seeking Motivation | Emotional Well-Being |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Path | X--Y | X--M | X,M--Y | X--Y | X--M | X,M--Y | X--Y | X--M | X,M--Y |
| Model | |||||||||
| Column | (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | (9) |
| Rising Housing Price | -0.575*** | 0.054*** | -0.566*** | -0.198*** | 0.054*** | -0.234*** | -0.092*** | 0.054*** | -0.089*** |
| (0.014) | (0.009) | (0.014) | (0.012) | (0.009) | (0.012) | (0.007) | (0.009) | (0.007) | |
| Social Status Seeking Motivation | -0.038*** | -0.043*** | -0.042*** | ||||||
| (0.008) | (0.007) | (0.005) | |||||||
| Age | -0.020*** | -0.009*** | -0.020*** | -0.011*** | -0.009*** | -0.012*** | 0.002*** | -0.009*** | 0.002*** |
| (0.001) | (0.001) | (0.001) | (0.001) | (0.001) | (0.001) | (0.001) | (0.001) | (0.001) | |
| Gender | 0.213*** | 0.259*** | 0.195*** | 0.063*** | 0.259*** | 0.182*** | 0.140*** | 0.259*** | 0.152*** |
| (0.019) | (0.014) | (0.020) | (0.018) | (0.014) | (0.018) | (0.012) | (0.014) | (0.012) | |
| Years of Education | 0.030*** | 0.006*** | 0.030*** | 0.045*** | 0.006*** | 0.050*** | 0.011*** | 0.006*** | 0.011*** |
| (0.002) | (0.001) | (0.002) | (0.002) | (0.001) | (0.002) | (0.001) | (0.001) | (0.001) | |
| Marital Status | 0.303*** | -0.117*** | 0.299*** | 0.098* | -0.117*** | 0.168*** | 0.172*** | -0.117*** | 0.169*** |
| (0.055) | (0.042) | (0.058) | (0.054) | (0.042) | (0.056) | (0.035) | (0.042) | (0.035) | |
| Non-agricultural Population | 0.010*** | 0.355*** | 0.093*** | 0.156*** | 0.355*** | 0.228*** | 0.015 | 0.355*** | 0.029** |
| (0.021) | (0.014) | (0.021) | (0.019) | (0.014) | (0.019) | (0.012) | (0.014) | (0.012) | |
| Smoking | -0.036* | -0.045*** | -0.093*** | -0.208*** | -0.045*** | -0.011 | 0.016 | -0.045*** | 0.015 |
| (0.020) | (0.014) | (0.021) | (0.018) | (0.014) | (0.019) | (0.012) | (0.014) | (0.012) | |
| Exercise | 0.022 | -0.081*** | 0.062*** | 0.197*** | -0.081*** | 0.052*** | 0.036*** | -0.081*** | 0.033*** |
| (0.017) | (0.012) | (0.018) | (0.016) | (0.012) | (0.017) | (0.010) | (0.012) | (0.010) | |
| Insurance | -0.061*** | -0.102*** | -0.076*** | -0.047*** | -0.102*** | -0.058*** | 0.001 | -0.102*** | -0.004 |
| (0.017) | (0.012) | (0.017) | (0.016) | (0.012) | (0.016) | (0.010) | (0.012) | (0.010) | |
| Medicare | -0.041 | -0.079*** | -0.042 | 0.078*** | -0.079*** | 0.066*** | 0.067*** | -0.079*** | 0.065*** |
| (0.025) | (0.017) | (0.026) | (0.022) | (0.017) | (0.023) | (0.014) | (0.017) | (0.014) | |
| Per Capita Income | 0.026*** | 0.030*** | 0.028*** | 0.056*** | 0.030*** | 0.056*** | 0.030*** | 0.030*** | 0.031*** |
| (0.006) | (0.004) | (0.006) | (0.005) | (0.004) | (0.005) | (0.003) | (0.004) | (0.003) | |
| Housing Ownership | -0.006 | -0.182*** | -0.012 | 0.056 | -0.182*** | 0.029 | 0.049** | -0.182*** | 0.040* |
| (0.041) | (0.026) | (0.041) | (0.035) | (0.026) | (0.035) | (0.022) | (0.026) | (0.022) | |
| _Cons | 2.807*** | 1.474*** | 2.861*** | 0.231*** | 1.474*** | 0.230*** | 3.776*** | 1.474*** | 3.831*** |
| (0.096) | (0.067) | (0.099) | (0.087) | (0.067) | (0.091) | (0.056) | (0.067) | (0.057) | |
| Province Dummy | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
| R2 | 0.095 | 0.073 | 0.093 | 0.068 | 0.073 | 0.075 | 0.031 | 0.073 | 0.034 |
| Observation | 34442 | 33147 | 33147 | 34442 | 33147 | 33147 | 33147 | 33147 | 32990 |
Notes: 1. The results reported in columns (1) and (2) are only the original estimation coefficient, not the marginal effect. 2. The value in parentheses is the standard error. 3.***, **, * represent 1%, 5%, and 10% significance levels, respectively. 4. The dependent variable in columns (2), (5), and (8) is social status seeking motivation.
Results of various robustness tests.
| Dependent Variable | Physical Health | Social Status Seeking Motivation | Physical Health | Mental Acuity | Social Status Seeking Motivation | Mental Acuity | Emotional Well-Being | Social Status Seeking Motivation | Emotional Well-Being |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Path | X--Y | X--M | X,M--Y | X--Y | X--M | X,M--Y | X--Y | X--M | X,M--Y |
| Column | (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | (9) |
| 1. Endogenous test: using “the daily wage of construction workers” as an instrumental variable for rising housing price. | |||||||||
| Model | |||||||||
| Rising Housing Price | -0.803*** | 0.041*** | -0.786*** | -0.203*** | 0.041*** | -0.304*** | -0.092*** | 0.041*** | -0.090*** |
| (0.024) | (0.015) | (0.024) | (0.021) | (0.015) | (0.022) | (0.014) | (0.015) | (0.014) | |
| Social Status Seeking Motivation | -0.034*** | -0.034*** | -0.040*** | ||||||
| (0.011) | (0.010) | (0.006) | |||||||
| Province Dummy | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
| R2 | 0.053 | 0.053 | 0.028 | 0.053 | 0.03 | ||||
| 352.16*** | 325.07*** | 348.2*** | 25.10*** | ||||||
| Observation | 22278 | 21322 | 21322 | 22278 | 21322 | 21322 | 21317 | 21322 | 21200 |
| 2. The core independent variable measurement is changed to use the average annual growth rate of housing price in commercial housing over the past five years to measure rising housing price. | |||||||||
| Model | |||||||||
| Rising Housing Price | -0.524*** | 0.054*** | -0.516*** | -0.178*** | 0.054*** | -0.208*** | -0.089*** | 0.054*** | -0.086*** |
| (0.016) | (0.009) | (0.014) | (0.011) | (0.009) | (0.012) | (0.007) | (0.009) | (0.007) | |
| Social Status Seeking Motivation | -0.039*** | -0.044*** | -0.042*** | ||||||
| (0.008) | (0.007) | (0.005) | |||||||
| Province Dummy | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
| R2 | 0.089 | 0.073 | 0.088 | 0.067 | 0.073 | 0.073 | 0.031 | 0.073 | 0.033 |
| Observation | 34442 | 33147 | 33147 | 34442 | 33147 | 33147 | 33147 | 33147 | 32990 |
| 3. The method of measuring the dependent variable is changed. | |||||||||
| Model | |||||||||
| Rising Housing Price | -0.072*** | 0.054*** | -0.068*** | -0.069*** | 0.054*** | -0.067*** | |||
| (0.010) | (0.009) | (0.010) | (0.006) | (0.009) | (0.006) | ||||
| Social Status Seeking Motivation | -0.045*** | -0.045*** | |||||||
| (0.007) | (0.004) | ||||||||
| Province Dummy | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | |||
| R2 | 0.015 | 0.073 | 0.015 | 0.052 | 0.073 | 0.056 | |||
| Observation | 33470 | 33147 | 33142 | 33029 | 33147 | 32887 | |||
| 4. More control variables are added. | |||||||||
| Model | |||||||||
| Rising Housing Price | -0.585*** | 0.051*** | -0.574*** | -0.205*** | 0.051*** | -0.242*** | -0.101*** | 0.051*** | -0.099*** |
| (0.014) | (0.009) | (0.014) | (0.012) | (0.009) | (0.012) | (0.007) | (0.009) | (0.007) | |
| Social Status Seeking Motivation | -0.038*** | -0.044*** | -0.043*** | ||||||
| (0.008) | (0.007) | (0.005) | |||||||
| Province Dummy | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
| R2 | 0.096 | 0.074 | 0.094 | 0.068 | 0.074 | 0.076 | 0.034 | 0.074 | 0.036 |
| Observation | 34438 | 33144 | 33144 | 34438 | 33144 | 33144 | 33144 | 33144 | 32987 |
| 5. The age range of the samples are modified to 45–65 years old. | |||||||||
| Model | |||||||||
| Rising Housing Price | -0.574*** | 0.032*** | -0.567*** | -0.231*** | 0.032*** | -0.257*** | -0.097*** | 0.032*** | -0.095*** |
| (0.017) | (0.011) | (0.018) | (0.014) | (0.011) | (0.014) | (0.009) | (0.011) | (0.009) | |
| Social Status Seeking Motivation | -0.027*** | -0.046*** | -0.044*** | ||||||
| (0.010) | (0.009) | (0.006) | |||||||
| Province Dummy | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
| R2 | 0.085 | 0.082 | 0.084 | 0.064 | 0.082 | 0.068 | 0.033 | 0.082 | 0.036 |
| Observation | 22345 | 21710 | 21710 | 22345 | 21710 | 21710 | 21710 | 21710 | 21620 |
Notes: 1. In the endogenous robustness tests, we also use “the distance from the residence to the county (urban) center” and the “time spent from residence to the county (urban) center” as the instrumental variables of rising housing price. 2. In the change of the core independent variable robustness test, we also use the housing price-income ratio and the housing price index to measure the rising housing price. 3. In the change of the age range of samples robustness, we also control the sample at “35 years old and above”, “45 years old and above”. Due to length limitations, we do not report a complete set of robustness test results, but these can be obtained from authors. 4. In addition to the Pols model in the table, the results obtained based on other models are only the original estimated coefficients, not the marginal effects. 5. The value in parentheses is the standard error. 6.***, **, * represent the 1%, 5%, and 10% significance levels, respectively. 7. The dependent variable in columns (2), (5), and (8) is social status seeking motivation.
The Mediation effect results of competitive saving motive.
| Dependent Variable | Physical Health | Mental Acuity | Emotional Well-Being | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | ||||||
| Column | (1) | (2) | (3) | |||
| Rising Housing Price | -0.383*** | (0.017) | -0.121*** | (0.016) | -0.045*** | (0.007) |
| Interaction | 0.061** | (0.026) | 0.041* | (0.023) | 0.030** | (0.015) |
| Child’s Age | 0.002 | (0.002) | -0.001 | (0.002) | 0.003** | (0.001) |
| Child’s Gender | 0.005 | (0.016) | 0.005 | (0.015) | -0.015 | (0.010) |
| Child’s Years of Education | 0.013*** | (0.002) | 0.011*** | (0.002) | 0.009*** | (0.001) |
| Child’s Marital Status | -0.023*** | (0.022) | -0.090*** | (0.020) | 0.033*** | (0.013) |
| Age | -0.019*** | (0.002) | -0.002 | (0.002) | -0.001 | (0.001) |
| Gender | 0.244*** | (0.017) | 0.161*** | (0.016) | 0.143*** | (0.010) |
| Years of Education | 0.007*** | (0.002) | 0.045*** | (0.002) | 0.010*** | (0.001) |
| Non-agricultural Population | -0.012 | (0.019) | 0.117*** | (0.021) | -0.009 | (0.013) |
| Urban Area | 0.004 | (0.006) | 0.090*** | (0.018) | 0.056*** | (0.011) |
| Household Income | 0.018*** | (0.002) | 0.041*** | (0.006) | 0.029*** | (0.004) |
| House Value | 0.070*** | (0.023) | 0.015*** | (0.002) | 0.007*** | (0.001) |
| Vehicle Ownership | -0.033 | (0.002) | 0.047** | (0.021) | 0.040*** | (0.014) |
| Educational Expenses | -0.006*** | (0.057) | 0.012*** | (0.002) | -0.002* | (0.001) |
| Unmarried Ratio | -1.300*** | (0.017) | 0.35*** | (0.054) | 0.034 | (0.035) |
| _Cons | 1.820*** | (0.110) | -1.437*** | (0.104) | 3.650*** | (0.067) |
| Province Dummy | YES | YES | YES | |||
| R2 | 0.203 | 0.067 | 0.037 | |||
| Observation | 30875 | 30875 | 29892 | |||
Note: 1. Interaction = rising housing price*child’s marital status (1 = married, 0 = unmarried). 2. In addition to the Pols model, the results obtained from other models are only the original estimated coefficients, not the marginal effects. 3. The value in parentheses is the standard error. 4.***, **, * represent 1%, 5%, and 10% significance levels, respectively.
Heterogeneity analysis results.
| Dependent Variable | Physical Health | Mental Acuity | Emotional Well-Being | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | ||||||
| Column | (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
| Child’s Gender | Male | Female | Male | Female | Male | Female |
| Rising Housing Price | -0.400*** | -0.356*** | -0.144*** | -0.084*** | -0.50*** | -0.038** |
| (0.017) | (0.022) | (0.016) | (0.020) | (0.010) | (0.013) | |
| Interaction | 0.069** | 0.058 | 0.052* | 0.027 | 0.035* | 0.020 |
| (0.026) | (0.033) | (0.023) | (0.030) | (0.015) | (0.019) | |
| R2 | 0.209 | 0.193 | 0.068 | 0.067 | 0.034 | 0.043 |
| Observation | 18952 | 11923 | 18952 | 11923 | 18256 | 11636 |
| Educational Level | College | Non-College | College | Non-College | College | Non-College |
| Rising Housing Price | -0.498*** | -0.370*** | -0.104** | -0.132*** | -0.038 | -0.049*** |
| (0.048) | (0.018) | (0.044) | (0.016) | (0.025) | (0.010) | |
| Interaction | -0.004 | 0.061** | -0.072 | 0.064*** | 0.04 | 0.034** |
| (0.078) | (0.027) | (0.071) | (0.025) | (0.040) | (0.014) | |
| R2 | 0.277 | 0.196 | 0.074 | 0.061 | 0.039 | 0.033 |
| Observation | 3666 | 28412 | 3666 | 28412 | 3620 | 27469 |
| Edu Expense | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
| Unmarried Gender Ratio | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
| Other Variables | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
| Province Dummy | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
Notes: 1. Interaction = rising housing price*child’s marriage status. 2. In addition to the Pols model, the results obtained from other models are only the original estimated coefficients, not the marginal effects. 3. The value in parentheses is the standard error. 4.***, **, * represent the 1%, 5%, and 10% significance levels, respectively. 5. Due to length limitations, the results of other variables are not reported in this paper but can be obtained from the authors.