Literature DB >> 33320614

Hierarchical Machine Learning for High-Fidelity 3D Printed Biopolymers.

Jennifer M Bone1, Christopher M Childs2, Aditya Menon3, Barnabás Póczos4, Adam W Feinberg1,3, Philip R LeDuc5, Newell R Washburn1,2.   

Abstract

A hierarchical machine learning (HML) framework is presented that uses a small dataset to learn and predict the dominant build parameters necessary to print high-fidelity 3D features of alginate hydrogels. We examine the 3D printing of soft hydrogel forms printed with the freeform reversible embedding of suspended hydrogel method based on a CAD file that isolated the single-strand diameter and shape fidelity of printed alginate. Combinations of system variables ranging from print speed, flow rate, ink concentration to nozzle diameter were systematically varied to generate a small dataset of 48 prints. Prints were imaged and scored according to their dimensional similarity to the CAD file, and high print fidelity was defined as prints with less than 10% error from the CAD file. As a part of the HML framework, statistical inference was performed, using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator to find the dominant variables that drive the error in the final prints. Model fit between the system parameters and print score was elucidated and improved by a parameterized middle layer of variable relationships which showed good performance between the predicted and observed data (R2 = 0.643). Optimization allowed for the prediction of build parameters that gave rise to high-fidelity prints of the measured features. A trade-off was identified when optimizing for the fidelity of different features printed within the same construct, showing the need for complex predictive design tools. A combination of known and discovered relationships was used to generate process maps for the 3D bioprinting designer that show error minimums based on the chosen input variables. Our approach offers a promising pathway toward scaling 3D bioprinting by optimizing print fidelity via learned build parameters that reduce the need for iterative testing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  LASSO; bioprinting; hydrogel; machine learning

Year:  2020        PMID: 33320614     DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c00755

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng        ISSN: 2373-9878


  6 in total

1.  Computational Modeling and Experimental Characterization of Extrusion Printing into Suspension Baths.

Authors:  Margaret E Prendergast; Jason A Burdick
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2021-11-20       Impact factor: 9.933

Review 2.  Bioink Formulation and Machine Learning-Empowered Bioprinting Optimization.

Authors:  Sebastian Freeman; Stefano Calabro; Roma Williams; Sha Jin; Kaiming Ye
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-06-13

3.  Emergence of FRESH 3D printing as a platform for advanced tissue biofabrication.

Authors:  Daniel J Shiwarski; Andrew R Hudson; Joshua W Tashman; Adam W Feinberg
Journal:  APL Bioeng       Date:  2021-02-16

Review 4.  Vascularization in Bioartificial Parenchymal Tissue: Bioink and Bioprinting Strategies.

Authors:  Gabriel Alexander Salg; Andreas Blaeser; Jamina Sofie Gerhardus; Thilo Hackert; Hannes Goetz Kenngott
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 6.208

5.  Machine Learning Reveals a General Understanding of Printability in Formulations Based on Rheology Additives.

Authors:  Ali Nadernezhad; Jürgen Groll
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 17.521

6.  Outbound Data Legality Analysis in CPTPP Countries under the Environment of Cross-Border Data Flow Governance.

Authors:  Jing Li
Journal:  J Environ Public Health       Date:  2022-09-28
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.