Melanie McIntyre1,2, Timothy Chimunda3,4,5,6, Mayank Koppa7, Nathan Dalton7, Hannah Reinders2, Sebastian Doeltgen1. 1. Swallowing Neurorehabilitation Research Lab, Speech Pathology, Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia. 2. Department of Speech Pathology, Bendigo Health, Bendigo, Victoria, Australia. 3. Division of Critical Care, Bendigo Health, Bendigo, Victoria, Australia. 4. Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Goulburn Valley Health, Shepparton, Victoria, Australia. 5. Department of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. 6. Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 7. School of Rural Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To identify, describe, and where possible meaningfully synthesize the reported risk factors for postextubation dysphagia (PED) in critically ill patients. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: A systematic search of peer-reviewed and grey literature was conducted in common scientific databases to identify previously evaluated risk factors of PED. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment used a double-blind approach. Random effects models were used for the meta-analyses. Meta-analyses were conducted where sufficient study numbers allowed after accounting for statistical and clinical heterogeneity. RESULTS: Twenty-five studies were included, which investigated a total of 150 potential risk factors. Of these, 63 risk factors were previously identified by at least one study each as significantly increasing the risk of PED. After accounting for clinical and statistical heterogeneity, only two risk factors were suitable for meta-analysis, gender, and duration of intubation. In separate meta-analyses, neither gender (RR 1.00 [0.71, 1.43], I2 = 0%) nor duration of intubation (RR 1.54 [-0.40, 3.49], I2 = 0%) were significant predictors of PED. CONCLUSIONS: A large number of risk factors for PED have been reported in the literature. However, significant variability in swallowing assessment methods, patient populations, timing of assessment, and duration of intubation prevented meaningful meta-analyses for the majority of these risk factors. Where meta-analysis was possible, gender and duration of intubation were not identified as risk factors for PED. We discuss future directions in clinical and research contexts. Laryngoscope, 132:364-374, 2022.
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To identify, describe, and where possible meaningfully synthesize the reported risk factors for postextubation dysphagia (PED) in critically ill patients. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: A systematic search of peer-reviewed and grey literature was conducted in common scientific databases to identify previously evaluated risk factors of PED. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment used a double-blind approach. Random effects models were used for the meta-analyses. Meta-analyses were conducted where sufficient study numbers allowed after accounting for statistical and clinical heterogeneity. RESULTS: Twenty-five studies were included, which investigated a total of 150 potential risk factors. Of these, 63 risk factors were previously identified by at least one study each as significantly increasing the risk of PED. After accounting for clinical and statistical heterogeneity, only two risk factors were suitable for meta-analysis, gender, and duration of intubation. In separate meta-analyses, neither gender (RR 1.00 [0.71, 1.43], I2 = 0%) nor duration of intubation (RR 1.54 [-0.40, 3.49], I2 = 0%) were significant predictors of PED. CONCLUSIONS: A large number of risk factors for PED have been reported in the literature. However, significant variability in swallowing assessment methods, patient populations, timing of assessment, and duration of intubation prevented meaningful meta-analyses for the majority of these risk factors. Where meta-analysis was possible, gender and duration of intubation were not identified as risk factors for PED. We discuss future directions in clinical and research contexts. Laryngoscope, 132:364-374, 2022.
Authors: Carlos A Reyes-Torres; Adriana Flores-López; Iván A Osuna-Padilla; Carmen M Hernández-Cárdenas; Aurora E Serralde-Zúñiga Journal: Nutr Clin Pract Date: 2021-10-07 Impact factor: 3.204