| Literature DB >> 33319818 |
Jayachandra S Yaradoddi1,2,3, Nagaraj R Banapurmath4,5, Sharanabasava V Ganachari4,5, Manzoore Elahi M Soudagar6, N M Mubarak7, Shankar Hallad4,5, Shoba Hugar8, H Fayaz9.
Abstract
The main goal of the present work was to develop a value-added product of biodegradable material for sustainable packaging. The use of agriculture waste-derived carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) mainly is to reduce the cost involved in the development of the film, at present commercially available CMS is costly. The main focus of the research is to translate the agricultural waste-derived CMC to useful biodegradable polymer suitable for packaging material. During this process CMC was extracted from the agricultural waste mainly sugar cane bagasse and the blends were prepared using CMC (waste derived), gelatin, agar and varied concentrations of glycerol; 1.5% (sample A), 2% (sample B), and 2.5% (sample C) was added. Thus, the film derived from the sample C (gelatin + CMC + agar) with 2.0% glycerol as a plasticizer exhibited excellent properties than other samples A and B. The physiochemical properties of each developed biodegradable plastics (sample A, B, C) were characterized using Fourier Transform Infra-Red (FTIR) spectroscopy and Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC), Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). The swelling test, solubility in different solvents, oil permeability coefficient, water permeability (WP), mechanical strength of the produced material was claimed to be a good material for packaging and meanwhile its biodegradability (soil burial method) indicated their environmental compatibility nature and commercial properties. The reflected work is a novel approach, and which is vital in the conversion of organic waste to value-added product development. There is also another way to utilize commercial CMC in preparation of polymeric blends for the packaging material, which can save considerable time involved in the recovery of CMC from sugarcane bagasse.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33319818 PMCID: PMC7738677 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-78912-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Indicated the biodegradability of all three samples.
| Sample name | Initial weight (g) (zero days) | Grams weight loss after 3 days of incubation and % of degradation | Grams weight loss after 5 days of incubation and % of degradation | Grams weight loss after 7 days of incubation and % of degradation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 0.4114 | 0.0536 g (13.02%) | 0.3093 (88.21%) | 0.0283 (95.08%) |
| B | 0.1524 | 0.0421 (27.62%) | 0.0828 (81.95%) | 0.0148 (91.66%) |
| C | 0.3482 | 0.1021 (29.32%) | 0.2121 (90.23%) | 0.0215 (96.41%) |
Shows the solubility test results of all samples soaked in a different solvent medium.
| Sl. no | Solvent | Samples | Insoluble | Partially soluble | Completely soluble |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ammonia | A | – | – | |
| B | – | – | |||
| C | – | – | |||
| 2 | Acetic acid | A | – | – | |
| B | – | – | |||
| C | – | – | |||
| 3 | Chloroform | A | – | – | |
| B | – | – | |||
| C | – | – | |||
| 4 | Acetone | A | – | – | |
| B | – | – | |||
| C | – | – | |||
| 5 | Methanol | A | – | – | |
| B | – | – | |||
| C | – | – | |||
| 6 | Sulphuric acid | A | – | – | |
| B | – | – | |||
| C | – | – | |||
| 7 | Orthophosphoric acid | A | – | – | |
| B | – | – | |||
| C | – | – | |||
| 8 | Ethanol | A | – | – | |
| B | – | – | |||
| C | – | – | |||
| 9 | Water | A | – | – | |
| B | – | – | |||
| C | – | – |
Indicating the swelling test results in different solvent system.
| Samples | Medium | Quantity of medium taken in ml | Initial weight of the samples in g | Final weight of samples obtained in g |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | Water | 20 | 0.0197 | 0.1525 |
| Chloroform | 5 | 0.0199 | 0.0654 | |
| Methanol | 5 | 0.0178 | 0.0073 | |
| B | Water | 20 | 0.0152 | 0.2582 |
| Chloroform | 5 | 0.0127 | 0.0310 | |
| Methanol | 5 | 0.0135 | 0.0102 | |
| C | Water | 20 | 0.0173 | 0.1511 |
| Chloroform | 5 | 0.0190 | 0.0338 | |
| Methanol | 5 | 0.0166 | 0.0081 |
Few important characteristic features possessed by the developed film for the ideal packaging material.
| Film sample | Tensile strength | Break strength | Water permeability | Oil permeability |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample A | 13.27 ± 0.28 | 8.51 ± 0.22 | 1321 ± 51 | 17.53 ± 1.02 |
| Sample B | 14.68 ± 0.29 | 9.16 ± 0.23 | 1360 ± 140 | 43.21 ± 2.14 |
| Sample C | 19.81 ± 0.41 | 0.79 ± 0.14 | 1143 ± 25 | 21.71 ± 4.16 |
Figure 1Mechanism of permeability and solubility properties of composite film.
Figure 2Depicting (a,b) are the Scanning electron microscopic (SEM) images of sugar can bagasse before the treatment and (c,d) represented the SEM image after the treatment of bagasse with acetic acid, sodium chlorite and other solvents.
Figure 3Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) results of sample A-Green color, sample- B-Blue color, and sample C-Maroon color.
Effect of temperature on degradation (weight loss) of the samples.
| Sample A | Sample B | Sample C | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Temperature in °C | % weight loss | Temperature in °C | % weight loss | Temperature in °C | % weight loss |
| 43.17 | 4.5 | 47.96 | 3.31 | 38.57 | 4.39 |
| 79.52 | 17.45 | 96.08 | 11.1 | 74.56 | 14.28 |
| 192.92 | 31.64 | 224.40 | 27.93 | 207.31 | 33.08 |
| 307.75 | 69.1 | 261.77 | 37.97 | 249.90 | 44.67 |
| 372.69 | 78.11 | 294.98 | 50.95 | 273.99 | 52.55 |
| 441.36 | 83.15 | 310.90 | 55.37 | 306.63 | 64.51 |
| 487.18 | 84.96 | 415.92 | 69.08 | 397.14 | 75.42 |
| 517.71 | 85.64 | 487.18 | 73.42 | 468.62 | 79.6 |
| 692.29 | 87.49 | 692.68 | 76.89 | 649.99 | 82.48 |
Figure 4Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) results of samples A, B and C.
Figure 5Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) of sample A, sample B, and sample C.
Figure 6Schematic representation of the development of Biodegradable plastic for sustainable packaging.