| Literature DB >> 33318795 |
Ramesh Bangaraiahgari1, Ramakanth Bhargav Panchangam2, Pradeep Puthenveetil3, Sabaretnam Mayilvaganan4, Rajesh Bangaraiahgari5, Rajkiran Reddy Banala6, Poongkodi Karunakaran7, Rafi Md1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The adenoma-carcinoma sequence in thyroid nodules is an enigmatic phenomenon. Genomics is the only definitive modality to resolve this hypothesis. Adenomas and papillary carcinomas tend to have mutations in RAS and highly specific BRAF gene respectively. In this context, we set out study the prevalence and clinical significance of these somatic mutations in surgical tissue samples.Entities:
Keywords: Adenoma; BRAF gene; Papillary thyroid cancer; RAS gene; Thyroidectomy
Year: 2020 PMID: 33318795 PMCID: PMC7726453 DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.11.069
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Med Surg (Lond) ISSN: 2049-0801
Details of Primer sequences.
| Gene | Primers | Annealing Temperature | Size of the PCR product |
|---|---|---|---|
| FP: 5′GCTTGCTCTGATAGGAAAATGAG-3′ | 56 °C | 237 bp | |
| RP: 5′GATACTCAGCAGCATCTCAGG-3′ | |||
| FP: 5′-GGCCTGCTGAAAATGACTGA-3′ | 52 °C | 81 bp | |
| RP: 5′-TAGCTGTATCGTCAAGGCAC-3′ | |||
| FP: 5′-TGA GGA GCG ATG ACG GAA-3′ | 52 °C | 133 bp | |
| RP: 5′-GCG CTAGGC TCA CCT CTA T-3′ | |||
| FP: 5′-CCT GTT TGTTGG ACA TAC TG-3 | 52 °C | 143 bp | |
| RP: 5′-CCT GTA GAG GTT AAT ATCCG-3′ |
Comparative significance and frequency of clinical, treatment variables.
| Variable | PTC | BTA | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (in years) | 41 ± 12 (19–57) | 43 ± 10.5 (26–65) | 0.115 |
| Sex ratio (M:F) | 1:1.3 | 1:1.6 | 0.626 |
| Lymphadenopathy | 30% | NA | NA |
| Tumour size (in cm) | 3.9 ± 0.9 | 4.3 ± 1.2 | NA |
| Total thyroidectomy | 96% | 80% | 0.08 |
| Hemithyroidectomy | 80% | 20% | 0.034 |
NA = Not applicable.
Analysis of prognostic factors in PTC.
| Variable | UVA | MVA |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 0.04 | 0.08 |
| Sex | 0.913 | 0.755 |
| Tumour size | 0.01 | 0.08 |
| ETI | 0.07 | 0.978 |
| Metastases | 0.009 | 0.01 |
| Lymphadenopathy | 0.387 | 0.623 |
UVA = Univariate analysis; MVA = Multivariate analysis.
Prognostic significance of BRAF gene mutations in PTC.
| Variable | BRAF positive PTC | BRAF negative PTC | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (in years) | 39 ± 10 (19–57) | 42 ± 9.5 (20–58) | 0.109 |
| Sex ratio (M:F) | 1:1.3 | 1:1.35 | 0.933 |
| Lymphadenopathy | 37% | 22% | 0.04 |
| Tumour size (in cm) | 4.1 ± 0.8 | 2.9 ± 1.3 | 0.03 |
| ETI | 41% | 19% | 0.02 |
| Metastasis rate | 9.6% | 6.2% | 0.262 |
| RFS | 4% | 2% | NA |
| OS | 100% | 100% | NA |
NA = Not applicable; RFS = recurrence survival rate; OS = overall survival rate.
Fig. 1BRAF gene mutation found in our study - upper panel shows normal sequence; lower panel shows mutant sequence.
Fig. 2NRAS gene mutation found in our study – upper panel shows normal sequence; lower panel shows mutant sequence.