| Literature DB >> 33318718 |
Paul Owusu Takyi1, Isaac Bentum-Ennin2.
Abstract
This paper evaluates and quantifies the short-term impact of the coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) on stock market performance in thirteen (13) African countries, using daily time series stock market data spanning 1st October 2019 to 30th June 2020. We employ a novel Bayesian structural time series approach (a state-space model) to estimate the relative effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on stock market performance in those countries. Generally, our Bayesian posterior estimates show that, in relative terms, stock market performances in Africa have significantly reduced during and after the occurrence of the COVID-19, usually between -2.7 % and -21 %. At the heterogeneous level, we find that 10 countries have their stock markets significantly and adversely affected by the COVID-19, whereas the remaining 3 countries see no significant impact (or a rather short-lived negative significant impact) of the COVID-19 pandemic on their stock markets. We find that, within our sample period, there is almost no chance that the COVID-19 pandemic would have positive effects on the stock market performance in Africa. Our findings contribute to the discussion and research on the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic by providing empirical evidence that the pandemic has restrictive effects on stock market performance in African economies.Entities:
Keywords: Africa; Bayesian approach; COVID-19; Sock market performance
Year: 2020 PMID: 33318718 PMCID: PMC7722498 DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconbus.2020.105968
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Econ Bus ISSN: 0148-6195
Major stock market indices.
| Country | Index |
|---|---|
| Ghana | GSE Composite Index (GSE-CI) |
| Nigeria | NSE All Share Index (NGSEINDEX) |
| South Africa | FTSE/JSE Top 40 Index (JTOPI) |
| Kenya | Kenya NSE 20 Index (NSE20) |
| Tanzania | Tanzania All Share Index (DSEI) |
| Tunisia | Tunindex (TUNINDEX) |
| Mauritius | Semdex (MDEX) |
| Morocco | Moroccan All Shares Index (MASI) |
| Zambia | LSE All Share (LASILZ) |
| Namibia | FTSE NSX Overall (FTN098) |
| Botswana | BSE Domestic Company (DCIBT) |
| Cote D'Ivoire | BRVM Composite Index (BRVMCI) |
| Uganda | Uganda All Share (ALSIUG) |
Pre- and Post-COVID-19 periods.
| Country | First confirmed case | pre-COVID-19 | post-COVID-19 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ghana | 12/03/2020 | 1/10/2019 to 11/03/2020 | 12/03/2020 to 30/06/2020 |
| Nigeria | 27/02/2020 | 1/10/2019 to 26/02/2020 | 27/02/2020 to 30/06/2020 |
| South Africa | 05/03/2020 | 1/10/2019 to 04/03/2020 | 05/03/2020 to 30/06/2020 |
| Kenya | 13/03/2020 | 1/10/2019 to 12/03/2020 | 13/03/2020 to 30/06/2020 |
| Tanzania | 16/03/2020 | 1/10/2019 to 15/03/2020 | 16/03/2020 to 30/06/2020 |
| Tunisia | 02/03/2020 | 1/10/2019 to 01/03/2020 | 02/03/2020 to 30/06/2020 |
| Mauritius | 19/03/2020 | 1/10/2019 to 18/03/2020 | 19/03/2020 to 30/06/2020 |
| Morocco | 02/03/2020 | 1/10/2019 to 01/03/2020 | 02/03/2020 to 30/06/2020 |
| Zambia | 18/03/2020 | 1/10/2019 to 17/03/2020 | 18/03/2020 to 30/06/2020 |
| Namibia | 14/03/2020 | 1/10/2019 to 13/03/2020 | 14/03/2020 to 30/06/2020 |
| Botswana | 30/03/2020 | 1/10/2019 to 29/03/2020 | 30/03/2020 to 30/06/2020 |
| Cote D'Ivoire | 11/03/2020 | 1/10/2019 to 10/03/2020 | 11/03/2020 to 30/06/2020 |
| Uganda | 22/03/2020 | 1/10/2019 to 21/03/2020 | 22/03/2020 to 30/06/2020 |
Results of posterior estimates (inference) of the causal impact of COVID-19 on stock market performance.
| Average | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual | Prediction | Absolute Effect | Relative Effect | |
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | |
| Panel A | ||||
| Ghana | 2053 | 2196 (46) | −143 (46) | −6.5%** (2.1 %)[-11 %, -2.3 |
| Nigeria | 23745 | 27284 (1396) | −3539 (1396) | −13%** (5.1 %)[-23 %, -2.6 |
| Kenya | 1982 | 2345 (138) | −363 (138) | −15%** (5.9 %)[-27 %, -3.5 |
| Tanzania | 1806 | 2035 (64) | −229 (64) | −11%** (3.2 %)[-17 %, -4.6 |
| Tunisia | 6498 | 7152 (98) | −654 (98) | −9.1%** (1.4 %)[-12 %, -6.5 |
| Morocco | 9859 | 12325 (325) | −2467 (325) | −20%** (2.6 %)[-25 %, -15 |
| Zambia | 4095 | 4247 (40) | −152 (40) | −3.6%** (0.94 %)[-5.4 %, -1.7 |
| Botswana | 7389 | 7596 (44) | −207 (44) | −2.7%** (0.58 %)[-3.9 %, -1.6 |
| Panel B | ||||
| South Africa | 45118 | 47923 (2215) | −2804 (2215) | −5.9% (4.6 %)[-15 %, 3.6 |
| Mauritius | 1639 | 1879 (126) | −240 (126) | −13% (6.7 %)[-25 %, 0.9 |
| Namibia | 967 | 1088 (79) | −121 (79) | −11% (7.3 %)[-25 %, 4.3 |
| Cote D'Ivoire | 136 | 146 (5.9) | −9.8 (5.9) | −6.7% (4%)[-15 %, 1.4 |
| Uganda | 1356 | 1562 (115) | −206 (115) | −13% (7.4 %)[-27 |
Note: The values in the brackets show 95 % confidence interval, while those in the parentheses are standard deviations. ** represent 5% significance level and p stands for Posterior tail-area probability.
Fig. 1Bayesian posterior distribution graphs for the causal effect of COVID-19: Pane A.
Note: On the original panel, the blue-dotted and the black solid lines horizontal indicate the time path of predicted series and actual series, respectively.
Fig. 2Bayesian posterior distribution graphs for the causal effect of COVID-19: Panel B.
Note: On the original panel, the blue-dotted and the black solid lines horizontal indicate the time path of predicted series and actual series, respectively.
Robustness checks results of posterior estimates of the causal impact of COVID-19 on stock market performance.
| Average | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual | Prediction | Absolute Effect | Relative Effect | |
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | |
| Panel A | ||||
| Ghana | 2053 | 2196 (46) | −143 (46) | −6.5%** (2.1 %)[-11 %, -2.4 |
| Nigeria | 23745 | 27232 (1447) | −3487 (1447) | −13%** (5.3 %)[-23 %, -2.2 |
| Kenya | 1982 | 2382(115) | −400 (115) | −17%** (4.8 %)[-26 %, -6.5 |
| Tanzania | 1806 | 2038 (62) | −231 (62) | −11%** (3.1 %)[-17 %, -5.1 |
| Tunisia | 6498 | 7160 (98) | −663 (98) | −9.3%** (1.4 %)[-12 %, -6.6 |
| Morocco | 9859 | 12326 (330) | −2467 (330) | −20%** (2.7 %)[-25 %, -15 |
| Zambia | 4095 | 4250 (40) | −155 (40) | −3.6%** (0.95 %)[-5.5 %, -1.8 |
| Botswana | 7389 | 7597 (44) | −208 (44) | −2.7%** (0.58 %)[-3.9 %, -1.6 |
| Mauritius | 1639 | 2062 (55) | −423 (55) | −21%** (2.7 %)[-26 %, -15 |
| Namibia | 967 | 1159 (18) | −191 (18) | −17%** (1.6 %)[-20 %, -13 |
| Panel B | ||||
| South Africa | 45118 | 46622 (1161) | −1503 (1161) | −3.2% (2.5 %)[-8.2 %, 1.7 |
| Cote D'Ivoire | 136 | 146 (5.9) | 9.8 (5.9) | −6.7% (4.1 %)[-15 %, 1.5 |
| Uganda | 1356 | 1590 (115) | −233 (115) | −15% (7.3 %)[-28 %, 0.62 |
Note: The values in the parentheses show 95 % confidence interval while those in the brackets are standard deviations. ** represent 5% significance level and p stands for Posterior tail-area probability.
| Cumulative | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual | Prediction | Absolute Effect | Relative Effect | |
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | |
| Panel A | ||||
| Ghana | 151917 | 162495 (3372) [155680, 168999] | −10578 (3372) | −6.5%** (2.1 %)[-11 %, -2.3 |
| Nigeria | 1970801 | 2264545 (115889) [2028830, 2492022] | −293744 (115889) | −13%** (5.1 %)[-23 %, -2.6 |
| Kenya | 144709 | 171172 (10100) [150774, 190753] | −26463 (10100) | −15%** (5.9 %)[-27 %, -3.5 |
| Tanzania | 130037 | 146533 (4642) | −16496 (4642) | −11%** (3.2 %)[-17 %, -4.6 |
| Tunisia | 532801 | 586446 (8029) | −53645 (8029) | −9.1%** (1.4 %)[-12 %, -6.5 |
| Morocco | 838008 | 1047662 (27630) | −209654 (27630) | −20%** (2.6 %)[-25 %, -15 |
| Zambia | 290730 | 301553 (2834) | −10823 (2834) | −3.6%** (0.94 %)[-5.4 %, -1.7 |
| Botswana | 576322 | 592469 (3424) | −16147 (3424) | −2.7%** (0.58 %)[-3.9 %, -1.6 |
| Panel B | ||||
| South Africa | 3564352 | 3785880 (174948) [3426968, 4120212] | −221528 (174948) [-555859,137384] | −5.9% (4.6 %)[-15 %, 3.6 |
| Mauritius | 118004 | 135295 (9049) | −17291 (9049) | −13% (6.7 %)[-25 %, 0.9 |
| Namibia | 68668 | 77249 (5632) [65367, 87665] | −8582 (5632) | −11% (7.3 %)[-25 %, 4.3 |
| Cote D'Ivoire | 10230 | 10968 (441.2) [10075, 11842] | −737.6 (441.2) [-1612, 155.0] | −6.7% (4%)[-15 %, 1.4 |
| Uganda | 89520 | 103083 (7577) [87434, 117588] | −13563 (7577) | −13% (7.4 %)[-27 |