Literature DB >> 33318208

Stem water cryogenic extraction biases estimation in deuterium isotope composition of plant source water.

Yongle Chen1,2, Brent R Helliker3, Xianhui Tang1, Fang Li1,2, Youping Zhou4, Xin Song5,6.   

Abstract

The hydrogen isotope ratio of water cryogenically extracted from plant stem samples (δ2Hstem_CVD) is routinely used to aid isotope applications that span hydrological, ecological, and paleoclimatological research. However, an increasing number of studies have shown that a key assumption of these applications-that δ2Hstem_CVD is equal to the δ2H of plant source water (δ2Hsource)-is not necessarily met in plants from various habitats. To examine this assumption, we purposedly designed an experimental system to allow independent measurements of δ2Hstem_CVD, δ2Hsource, and δ2H of water transported in xylem conduits (δ2Hxylem) under controlled conditions. Our measurements performed on nine woody plant species from diverse habitats revealed a consistent and significant depletion in δ2Hstem_CVD compared with both δ2Hsource and δ2Hxylem Meanwhile, no significant discrepancy was observed between δ2Hsource and δ2Hxylem in any of the plants investigated. These results cast significant doubt on the long-standing view that deuterium fractionation occurs during root water uptake and, alternatively, suggest that measurement bias inherent in the cryogenic extraction method is the root cause of δ2Hstem_CVD depletion. We used a rehydration experiment to show that the stem water cryogenic extraction error could originate from a dynamic exchange between organically bound deuterium and liquid water during water extraction. In light of our finding, we suggest caution when partitioning plant water sources and reconstructing past climates using hydrogen isotopes, and carefully propose that the paradigm-shifting phenomenon of ecohydrological separation ("two water worlds") is underpinned by an extraction artifact.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cryogenic vacuum distillation; deuterium isotope; ecohydrological separation; plant water uptake; source water

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33318208      PMCID: PMC7776815          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2014422117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  24 in total

1.  Climatic controls on central African hydrology during the past 20,000 years.

Authors:  Enno Schefuss; Stefan Schouten; Ralph R Schneider
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-10-13       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Rapid online equilibration method to determine the D/H ratios of non-exchangeable hydrogen in cellulose.

Authors:  Marc S Filot; Markus Leuenberger; Anna Pazdur; Tatjana Boettger
Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  A direct and rapid leaf water extraction method for isotopic analysis.

Authors:  L I Peters; D Yakir
Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Potential limitation of cryogenic vacuum extractions and spiked experiments.

Authors:  Marcel Gaj; Stephan Kaufhold; Jeffrey J McDonnell
Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Terrestrial water fluxes dominated by transpiration.

Authors:  Scott Jasechko; Zachary D Sharp; John J Gibson; S Jean Birks; Yi Yi; Peter J Fawcett
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  An explanation for the isotopic offset between soil and stem water in a temperate tree species.

Authors:  Adrià Barbeta; Teresa E Gimeno; Laura Clavé; Bastien Fréjaville; Sam P Jones; Camille Delvigne; Lisa Wingate; Jérôme Ogée
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 10.151

7.  High-resolution isotope measurements resolve rapid ecohydrological dynamics at the soil-plant interface.

Authors:  Till H M Volkmann; Kristine Haberer; Arthur Gessler; Markus Weiler
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 10.151

8.  Significant Difference in Hydrogen Isotope Composition Between Xylem and Tissue Water in Populus Euphratica.

Authors:  Liangju Zhao; Lixin Wang; Lucas A Cernusak; Xiaohong Liu; Honglang Xiao; Maoxian Zhou; Shiqiang Zhang
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 7.228

9.  Water and deuterium oxide permeability through aquaporin 1: MD predictions and experimental verification.

Authors:  Artem B Mamonov; Rob D Coalson; Mark L Zeidel; John C Mathai
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.086

10.  Borehole Equilibration: Testing a New Method to Monitor the Isotopic Composition of Tree Xylem Water in situ.

Authors:  John D Marshall; Matthias Cuntz; Matthias Beyer; Maren Dubbert; Kathrin Kuehnhammer
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 5.753

View more
  3 in total

1.  Drought reduces water uptake in beech from the drying topsoil, but no compensatory uptake occurs from deeper soil layers.

Authors:  Arthur Gessler; Lukas Bächli; Elham Rouholahnejad Freund; Kerstin Treydte; Marcus Schaub; Matthias Haeni; Markus Weiler; Stefan Seeger; John Marshall; Christian Hug; Roman Zweifel; Frank Hagedorn; Andreas Rigling; Matthias Saurer; Katrin Meusburger
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 10.323

2.  Metabolism is a major driver of hydrogen isotope fractionation recorded in tree-ring glucose of Pinus nigra.

Authors:  Thomas Wieloch; Michael Grabner; Angela Augusti; Henrik Serk; Ina Ehlers; Jun Yu; Jürgen Schleucher
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2022-02-26       Impact factor: 10.323

3.  Do 2 H and 18 O in leaf water reflect environmental drivers differently?

Authors:  Lucas A Cernusak; Adrià Barbeta; Rosemary T Bush; Rebekka Eichstaedt Bögelein; Juan Pedro Ferrio; Lawrence B Flanagan; Arthur Gessler; Paula Martín-Gómez; Regina T Hirl; Ansgar Kahmen; Claudia Keitel; Chun-Ta Lai; Niels C Munksgaard; Daniel B Nelson; Jérôme Ogée; John S Roden; Hans Schnyder; Steven L Voelker; Lixin Wang; Hilary Stuart-Williams; Lisa Wingate; Wusheng Yu; Liangju Zhao; Matthias Cuntz
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 10.323

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.