BACKGROUND: The pediatric heart transplant community uses weight-based donor-to-recipient size matching almost exclusively, despite no evidence to validate weight as a reliable surrogate of cardiac size. Donor size mismatch is the second most common reason for the refusal of donor hearts in current practice (∼30% of all refusals). Whereas case-by-case segmentation of total cardiac volume (TCV) by computed tomography (CT) for direct virtual transplantation is an attractive option, it remains limited by the unavailability of donor chest CT. We sought to establish a predictive model for donor TCV on the basis of anthropomorphic and chest X-ray (CXR) cardiac measures. METHODS: Banked imaging studies from 141 subjects with normal CT chest angiograms were obtained and segmented using 3-dimensional modeling to derive TCV. CXR data were available for 62 of those subjects. A total of 3 predictive models of TCV were fit through multiple linear regression using the following variables: Model A (weight only); Model B (weight, height, sex, and age); Model C (weight, height, sex, age, and 1-view anteroposterior CXR maximal horizontal cardiac width). RESULTS: Model C provided the most accurate prediction of TCV (optimism corrected R2 = 0.99, testing set R2 = 0.98, mean absolute percentage error [MAPE] = 8.6%) and outperformed Model A (optimism corrected R2 = 0.94, testing set R2 = 0.94, MAPE = 16.1%) and Model B (optimism corrected R2 = 0.97, testing set R2 = 0.97, MAPE = 11.1%). CONCLUSIONS: TCV can be predicted accurately using readily available anthropometrics and a 1-view CXR from donor candidates. This simple and scalable method of TCV estimation may provide a reliable and consistent method to improve donor size matching.
BACKGROUND: The pediatric heart transplant community uses weight-based donor-to-recipient size matching almost exclusively, despite no evidence to validate weight as a reliable surrogate of cardiac size. Donor size mismatch is the second most common reason for the refusal of donor hearts in current practice (∼30% of all refusals). Whereas case-by-case segmentation of total cardiac volume (TCV) by computed tomography (CT) for direct virtual transplantation is an attractive option, it remains limited by the unavailability of donor chest CT. We sought to establish a predictive model for donor TCV on the basis of anthropomorphic and chest X-ray (CXR) cardiac measures. METHODS: Banked imaging studies from 141 subjects with normal CT chest angiograms were obtained and segmented using 3-dimensional modeling to derive TCV. CXR data were available for 62 of those subjects. A total of 3 predictive models of TCV were fit through multiple linear regression using the following variables: Model A (weight only); Model B (weight, height, sex, and age); Model C (weight, height, sex, age, and 1-view anteroposterior CXR maximal horizontal cardiac width). RESULTS: Model C provided the most accurate prediction of TCV (optimism corrected R2 = 0.99, testing set R2 = 0.98, mean absolute percentage error [MAPE] = 8.6%) and outperformed Model A (optimism corrected R2 = 0.94, testing set R2 = 0.94, MAPE = 16.1%) and Model B (optimism corrected R2 = 0.97, testing set R2 = 0.97, MAPE = 11.1%). CONCLUSIONS: TCV can be predicted accurately using readily available anthropometrics and a 1-view CXR from donor candidates. This simple and scalable method of TCV estimation may provide a reliable and consistent method to improve donor size matching.
Authors: Nicholas A Szugye; Angela Lorts; Farhan Zafar; Michael Taylor; David L S Morales; Ryan A Moore Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant Date: 2018-12-21 Impact factor: 10.247
Authors: Eva Maria Delmo Walter; Michael Huebler; Stephan Schubert; Hans Lehmkuhl; Yuguo Weng; Felix Berger; Roland Hetzer Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2011-10-27 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Anees J Razzouk; Joyce K Johnston; Ranae L Larsen; Richard E Chinnock; James A Fitts; Leonard L Bailey Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 10.247
Authors: Adam K Morrison; Charitha Gowda; Dmitry Tumin; Christina M Phelps; Don Hayes; Joseph Tobias; Robert J Gajarski; Deipanjan Nandi Journal: Pediatr Transplant Date: 2018-05-17
Authors: Jonathan D Plasencia; Yiannis Kamarianakis; Justin R Ryan; Tara Karamlou; Susan S Park; John J Nigro; David H Frakes; Stephen G Pophal; Carl F Lagerstrom; Daniel A Velez; Steven D Zangwill Journal: Pediatr Transplant Date: 2018-09-24
Authors: Timothy A Gong; Susan M Joseph; Brian Lima; Gonzalo V Gonzalez-Stawinski; Aayla K Jamil; Joost Felius; Huanying Qin; Giovanna Saracino; Aldo E Rafael; Parag Kale; Shelley A Hall Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant Date: 2018-03-17 Impact factor: 10.247
Authors: Svetlana B Shugh; Nicholas A Szugye; Farhan Zafar; Kyle W Riggs; Chet Villa; Angela Lorts; David L S Morales; Ryan A Moore Journal: Pediatr Transplant Date: 2019-12-27
Authors: Nicholas A Szugye; David L S Morales; Angela Lorts; Farhan Zafar; Ryan A Moore Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant Date: 2021-08-27 Impact factor: 10.247
Authors: Alicija Vileito; Christian V Hulzebos; Mona C Toet; Dyvonne H Baptist; Eduard A A Verhagen; Marion J Siebelink Journal: Eur J Pediatr Date: 2021-06-09 Impact factor: 3.183