Literature DB >> 33317704

Does reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fracture portend poorer outcomes than for elective indications?

Alexander M Crespo1, Tyler A Luthringer2, Alexander Frost1, Lily Khabie1, Christopher Roche3, Joseph D Zuckerman1, Kenneth A Egol1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The number of reverse total shoulder arthroplasties (RTSAs) performed annually has increased, and the indications for RTSA have expanded beyond rotator cuff arthropathy to include treatment of complex proximal humeral fractures. No studies exist comparing clinical, functional, and radiographic outcomes in patients receiving RTSA for the treatment of acute fracture vs. those undergoing the procedure for degenerative conditions. This study was designed to fill the void in this knowledge gap. We hypothesized that patients undergoing RTSA for fracture treatment would experience worse clinical outcomes than those undergoing elective RTSA.
METHODS: A prospectively collected database was queried for patients undergoing RTSA between 2007 and 2016. Patients were sorted based on the indication for RTSA: treatment of acute proximal humeral fracture vs. "elective" treatment of degenerative conditions of the shoulder. Baseline demographic characteristics, intraoperative and perioperative complications, and clinical, functional, and radiographic outcomes were collected. Only patients with ≥2 years' follow-up were included. Final outcomes were compared between the fracture and elective groups.
RESULTS: In total, 1984 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 1876 in the elective group and 108 in the fracture group. Compared with the elective RTSA group, the group undergoing RTSA for fracture treatment was older, was female dominant, and was less likely to have undergone a previous operation on the ipsilateral shoulder. RTSA for fracture was associated with a longer hospital length of stay and greater intraoperative blood loss. The incidence of postoperative adverse events was 7.1% in the elective group vs. 4.6% in the fracture group. Functional outcomes did not differ beyond 1 year or at mean final follow-up > 40 months.
CONCLUSION: Despite differences in patient demographic characteristics, the outcome and complication profiles are similar between patients undergoing RTSA for acute fracture and those indicated for the treatment of degenerative conditions of the shoulder.
Copyright © 2020 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty; adverse events; elective; functional outcomes; proximal humeral fracture; rotator cuff arthropathy

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33317704     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.03.053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  3 in total

Review 1.  [Current trends in reverse fracture arthroplasty].

Authors:  M Warnhoff; G Jensen; H Lill; A Ellwein
Journal:  Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-07-21

2.  Comparison of Early Range of Motion in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Based on Indication: A Single Center Retrospective Review.

Authors:  Michael E Doany; Kenny Ling; Rosen Jeong; Alireza Nazemi; David E Komatsu; Edward D Wang
Journal:  J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast       Date:  2022-06-14

3.  Proximal humerus fractures: epidemiology and trends in surgical management of hospital-admitted patients in Portugal.

Authors:  Miguel Relvas Silva; Daniela Linhares; Maria João Leite; Bernardo Nunes; João Torres; Nuno Neves; Manuel Ribeiro Silva
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2022-01-24
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.