BACKGROUND: Pathological atrial fibrosis is a major contributor to sustained atrial fibrillation. Currently, late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) scans provide the only noninvasive estimate of atrial fibrosis. However, widespread adoption of atrial LGE has been hindered partly by nonstandardized image processing techniques, which can be operator and algorithm dependent. Minimal validation and limited access to transparent software platforms have also exacerbated the problem. This study aims to estimate atrial fibrosis from cardiac magnetic resonance scans using a reproducible operator-independent fully automatic open-source end-to-end pipeline. METHODS: A multilabel convolutional neural network was designed to accurately delineate atrial structures including the blood pool, pulmonary veins, and mitral valve. The output from the network removed the operator dependent steps in a reproducible pipeline and allowed for automated estimation of atrial fibrosis from LGE-cardiac magnetic resonance scans. The pipeline results were compared against manual fibrosis burdens, calculated using published thresholds: image intensity ratio 0.97, image intensity ratio 1.61, and mean blood pool signal +3.3 SD. RESULTS: We validated our methods on a large 3-dimensional LGE-cardiac magnetic resonance data set from 207 labeled scans. Automatic atrial segmentation achieved a 91% Dice score, compared with the mutual agreement of 85% in Dice seen in the interobserver analysis of operators. Intraclass correlation coefficients of the automatic pipeline with manually generated results were excellent and better than or equal to interobserver correlations for all 3 thresholds: 0.94 versus 0.88, 0.99 versus 0.99, 0.99 versus 0.96 for image intensity ratio 0.97, image intensity ratio 1.61, and +3.3 SD thresholds, respectively. Automatic analysis required 3 minutes per case on a standard workstation. The network and the analysis software are publicly available. CONCLUSIONS: Our pipeline provides a fully automatic estimation of fibrosis burden from LGE-cardiac magnetic resonance scans that is comparable to manual analysis. This removes one key source of variability in the measurement of atrial fibrosis.
BACKGROUND: Pathological atrial fibrosis is a major contributor to sustained atrial fibrillation. Currently, late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) scans provide the only noninvasive estimate of atrial fibrosis. However, widespread adoption of atrial LGE has been hindered partly by nonstandardized image processing techniques, which can be operator and algorithm dependent. Minimal validation and limited access to transparent software platforms have also exacerbated the problem. This study aims to estimate atrial fibrosis from cardiac magnetic resonance scans using a reproducible operator-independent fully automatic open-source end-to-end pipeline. METHODS: A multilabel convolutional neural network was designed to accurately delineate atrial structures including the blood pool, pulmonary veins, and mitral valve. The output from the network removed the operator dependent steps in a reproducible pipeline and allowed for automated estimation of atrial fibrosis from LGE-cardiac magnetic resonance scans. The pipeline results were compared against manual fibrosis burdens, calculated using published thresholds: image intensity ratio 0.97, image intensity ratio 1.61, and mean blood pool signal +3.3 SD. RESULTS: We validated our methods on a large 3-dimensional LGE-cardiac magnetic resonance data set from 207 labeled scans. Automatic atrial segmentation achieved a 91% Dice score, compared with the mutual agreement of 85% in Dice seen in the interobserver analysis of operators. Intraclass correlation coefficients of the automatic pipeline with manually generated results were excellent and better than or equal to interobserver correlations for all 3 thresholds: 0.94 versus 0.88, 0.99 versus 0.99, 0.99 versus 0.96 for image intensity ratio 0.97, image intensity ratio 1.61, and +3.3 SD thresholds, respectively. Automatic analysis required 3 minutes per case on a standard workstation. The network and the analysis software are publicly available. CONCLUSIONS: Our pipeline provides a fully automatic estimation of fibrosis burden from LGE-cardiac magnetic resonance scans that is comparable to manual analysis. This removes one key source of variability in the measurement of atrial fibrosis.
Entities:
Keywords:
atrial fibrillation; deep learning; fibrosis; magnetic resonance imaging
Authors: John Whitaker; Ronak Rajani; Henry Chubb; Mark Gabrawi; Marta Varela; Matthew Wright; Steven Niederer; Mark D O'Neill Journal: Europace Date: 2016-05-31 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Nassir F Marrouche; David Wilber; Gerhard Hindricks; Pierre Jais; Nazem Akoum; Francis Marchlinski; Eugene Kholmovski; Nathan Burgon; Nan Hu; Lluis Mont; Thomas Deneke; Mattias Duytschaever; Thomas Neumann; Moussa Mansour; Christian Mahnkopf; Bengt Herweg; Emile Daoud; Erik Wissner; Paul Bansmann; Johannes Brachmann Journal: JAMA Date: 2014-02-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Jordan B King; Peyman N Azadani; Promporn Suksaranjit; Adam P Bress; Daniel M Witt; Frederick T Han; Mihail G Chelu; Michelle A Silver; Joseph Biskupiak; Brent D Wilson; Alan K Morris; Eugene G Kholmovski; Nassir Marrouche Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2017-09-12 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Geoffrey R Wong; Chrishan J Nalliah; Geoffrey Lee; Aleksandr Voskoboinik; Sandeep Prabhu; Ramanathan Parameswaran; Hariharan Sugumar; Robert D Anderson; Alex McLellan; Liang-Han Ling; Joseph B Morton; Prashanthan Sanders; Peter M Kistler; Jonathan M Kalman Journal: JACC Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2019-07-31
Authors: James L Harrison; Henrik K Jensen; Sarah A Peel; Amedeo Chiribiri; Anne K Grøndal; Lars Ø Bloch; Steen F Pedersen; Jacob F Bentzon; Christoph Kolbitsch; Rashed Karim; Steven E Williams; Nick W Linton; Kawal S Rhode; Jaswinder Gill; Michael Cooklin; C A Rinaldi; Matthew Wright; Won Y Kim; Tobias Schaeffter; Reza S Razavi; Mark D O'Neill Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2014-01-12 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Eva M Benito; Alicia Carlosena-Remirez; Eduard Guasch; Susana Prat-González; Rosario J Perea; Rosa Figueras; Roger Borràs; David Andreu; Elena Arbelo; J Maria Tolosana; Felipe Bisbal; Josep Brugada; Antonio Berruezo; Lluis Mont Journal: Europace Date: 2017-08-01 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Michael Quail; Karl Grunseich; Lauren A Baldassarre; Hamid Mojibian; Mark A Marieb; Daniel Cornfeld; Aaron Soufer; Albert J Sinusas; Dana C Peters Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2019-01-03 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Nadia A Farrag; Rebecca E Thornhill; Frank S Prato; Allan C Skanes; Rebecca Sullivan; David Sebben; John Butler; Jane Sykes; Benjamin Wilk; Eranga Ukwatta Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-07-08 Impact factor: 3.752
Authors: Caroline H Roney; Charles Sillett; John Whitaker; Jose Alonso Solis Lemus; Iain Sim; Irum Kotadia; Mark O'Neill; Steven E Williams; Steven A Niederer Journal: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2021-12-18 Impact factor: 6.875