| Literature DB >> 33316417 |
Matteo Ferro1, Giuseppe Lucarelli2, Felice Crocetto3, Pasquale Dolce4, Antonio Verde5, Evelina La Civita6, Silvia Zappavigna7, Ottavio de Cobelli1, Giuseppe Di Lorenzo8, Bianca Arianna Facchini7, Luca Scafuri5, Livia Onofrio5, Angelo Porreca9, Gian Maria Busetto10, Guru Sonpavde11, Michele Caraglia12, Michele Klain13, Daniela Terracciano6, Sabino De Placido14, Carlo Buonerba15.
Abstract
Although both docetaxel and androgen-receptor-axis-targeted (ARAT) agents have yielded survival improvements in combination with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) compared to ADT alone in metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) patients, the optimal therapeutic choice remains to be established. We analyzed estimates of the hazard ratios for death (OS-HRs) in patients treated in the first-line setting enrolled in the GETUG-AFU15, CHAARTED, STAMPEDE, LATITUDE, ENZAMET, and TITAN trials. Overall, men with mCSPC receiving ADT with vs. without either an ARAT agent or docetaxel as first-line systemic therapy showed a pooled OS-HR of 0.69 (95 % CI: 0.61-0.78), with significant heterogeneity (p = 0.045, I2 = 52.5 %). Network meta-analysis showed an OS-HR in patients receiving an ARAT agent vs. docetaxel of 0.78 (95 %CI: 0.67-0.91). In conclusion, the evidence analysed indicates that an ARAT agent may provide improved OS outcomes compared to docetaxel. Prospective randomized trials are warranted.Entities:
Keywords: Abiraterone; Apalutamide; Castration-sensitive prostate cancer; Enzalutamide
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33316417 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2020.103198
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Crit Rev Oncol Hematol ISSN: 1040-8428 Impact factor: 6.312