Literature DB >> 33316035

Large-scale comparative review and assessment of computational methods for anti-cancer peptide identification.

Xiao Liang1,2, Fuyi Li3,4,5, Jinxiang Chen1, Junlong Li1, Hao Wu1, Shuqin Li1,2, Jiangning Song3,4,6, Quanzhong Liu1,2.   

Abstract

Anti-cancer peptides (ACPs) are known as potential therapeutics for cancer. Due to their unique ability to target cancer cells without affecting healthy cells directly, they have been extensively studied. Many peptide-based drugs are currently evaluated in the preclinical and clinical trials. Accurate identification of ACPs has received considerable attention in recent years; as such, a number of machine learning-based methods for in silico identification of ACPs have been developed. These methods promote the research on the mechanism of ACPs therapeutics against cancer to some extent. There is a vast difference in these methods in terms of their training/testing datasets, machine learning algorithms, feature encoding schemes, feature selection methods and evaluation strategies used. Therefore, it is desirable to summarize the advantages and disadvantages of the existing methods, provide useful insights and suggestions for the development and improvement of novel computational tools to characterize and identify ACPs. With this in mind, we firstly comprehensively investigate 16 state-of-the-art predictors for ACPs in terms of their core algorithms, feature encoding schemes, performance evaluation metrics and webserver/software usability. Then, comprehensive performance assessment is conducted to evaluate the robustness and scalability of the existing predictors using a well-prepared benchmark dataset. We provide potential strategies for the model performance improvement. Moreover, we propose a novel ensemble learning framework, termed ACPredStackL, for the accurate identification of ACPs. ACPredStackL is developed based on the stacking ensemble strategy combined with SVM, Naïve Bayesian, lightGBM and KNN. Empirical benchmarking experiments against the state-of-the-art methods demonstrate that ACPredStackL achieves a comparative performance for predicting ACPs. The webserver and source code of ACPredStackL is freely available at http://bigdata.biocie.cn/ACPredStackL/ and https://github.com/liangxiaoq/ACPredStackL, respectively.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anti-cancer peptides; bioinformatics; ensemble learning; performance assessment; prediction; sequence analysis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33316035      PMCID: PMC8294543          DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbaa312

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brief Bioinform        ISSN: 1467-5463            Impact factor:   11.622


  58 in total

Review 1.  Peptide therapeutics: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Keld Fosgerau; Torsten Hoffmann
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 7.851

2.  GlycoMine: a machine learning-based approach for predicting N-, C- and O-linked glycosylation in the human proteome.

Authors:  Fuyi Li; Chen Li; Mingjun Wang; Geoffrey I Webb; Yang Zhang; James C Whisstock; Jiangning Song
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  ACPred-Fuse: fusing multi-view information improves the prediction of anticancer peptides.

Authors:  Bing Rao; Chen Zhou; Guoying Zhang; Ran Su; Leyi Wei
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 11.622

4.  PASSION: an ensemble neural network approach for identifying the binding sites of RBPs on circRNAs.

Authors:  Cangzhi Jia; Yue Bi; Jinxiang Chen; André Leier; Fuyi Li; Jiangning Song
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  DeepCleave: a deep learning predictor for caspase and matrix metalloprotease substrates and cleavage sites.

Authors:  Fuyi Li; Jinxiang Chen; André Leier; Tatiana Marquez-Lago; Quanzhong Liu; Yanze Wang; Jerico Revote; A Ian Smith; Tatsuya Akutsu; Geoffrey I Webb; Lukasz Kurgan; Jiangning Song
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-02-15       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  iACP: a sequence-based tool for identifying anticancer peptides.

Authors:  Wei Chen; Hui Ding; Pengmian Feng; Hao Lin; Kuo-Chen Chou
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-03-29

7.  GlycoMinestruct: a new bioinformatics tool for highly accurate mapping of the human N-linked and O-linked glycoproteomes by incorporating structural features.

Authors:  Fuyi Li; Chen Li; Jerico Revote; Yang Zhang; Geoffrey I Webb; Jian Li; Jiangning Song; Trevor Lithgow
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  A Novel Hybrid Sequence-Based Model for Identifying Anticancer Peptides.

Authors:  Lei Xu; Guangmin Liang; Longjie Wang; Changrui Liao
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 4.096

9.  CD-HIT Suite: a web server for clustering and comparing biological sequences.

Authors:  Ying Huang; Beifang Niu; Ying Gao; Limin Fu; Weizhong Li
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  CAMP: a useful resource for research on antimicrobial peptides.

Authors:  Shaini Thomas; Shreyas Karnik; Ram Shankar Barai; V K Jayaraman; Susan Idicula-Thomas
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  7 in total

1.  STALLION: a stacking-based ensemble learning framework for prokaryotic lysine acetylation site prediction.

Authors:  Shaherin Basith; Gwang Lee; Balachandran Manavalan
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 11.622

Review 2.  Nanoparticles as Physically- and Biochemically-Tuned Drug Formulations for Cancers Therapy.

Authors:  Valentina Foglizzo; Serena Marchiò
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 6.575

3.  AntiDMPpred: a web service for identifying anti-diabetic peptides.

Authors:  Xue Chen; Jian Huang; Bifang He
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 3.061

Review 4.  Empirical comparison and analysis of machine learning-based predictors for predicting and analyzing of thermophilic proteins.

Authors:  Phasit Charoenkwan; Nalini Schaduangrat; Md Mehedi Hasan; Mohammad Ali Moni; Pietro Lió; Watshara Shoombuatong
Journal:  EXCLI J       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 4.022

Review 5.  Recent development of machine learning-based methods for the prediction of defensin family and subfamily.

Authors:  Phasit Charoenkwan; Nalini Schaduangrat; S M Hasan Mahmud; Orawit Thinnukool; Watshara Shoombuatong
Journal:  EXCLI J       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 4.022

6.  MLACP 2.0: An updated machine learning tool for anticancer peptide prediction.

Authors:  Le Thi Phan; Hyun Woo Park; Thejkiran Pitti; Thirumurthy Madhavan; Young-Jun Jeon; Balachandran Manavalan
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 6.155

7.  Prediction of anti-inflammatory peptides by a sequence-based stacking ensemble model named AIPStack.

Authors:  Hua Deng; Chaofeng Lou; Zengrui Wu; Weihua Li; Guixia Liu; Yun Tang
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-08-17
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.