Literature DB >> 33315115

Assessment of Time-to-Treatment Initiation and Survival in a Cohort of Patients With Common Cancers.

Eugene B Cone1,2, Maya Marchese1,2, Marco Paciotti1,3, David-Dan Nguyen1,2, Junaid Nabi1,2, Alexander P Cole1,2, George Molina4, Rose L Molina5, Christina A Minami6, Lorelei A Mucci7, Adam S Kibel1, Quoc-Dien Trinh1,2.   

Abstract

Importance: Resource limitations because of pandemic or other stresses on infrastructure necessitate the triage of time-sensitive care, including cancer treatments. Optimal time to treatment is underexplored, so recommendations for which cancer treatments can be deferred are often based on expert opinion. Objective: To evaluate the association between increased time to definitive therapy and mortality as a function of cancer type and stage for the 4 most prevalent cancers in the US. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study assessed treatment and outcome information from patients with nonmetastatic breast, prostate, non-small cell lung (NSCLC), and colon cancers from 2004 to 2015, with data analyzed January to March 2020. Data on outcomes associated with appropriate curative-intent surgical, radiation, or medical therapy were gathered from the National Cancer Database. Exposures: Time-to-treatment initiation (TTI), the interval between diagnosis and therapy, using intervals of 8 to 60, 61 to 120, 121 to 180, and greater than 180 days. Main Outcomes and Measures: 5-year and 10-year predicted all-cause mortality.
Results: This study included 2 241 706 patients (mean [SD] age 63 [11.9] years, 1 268 794 [56.6%] women, 1 880 317 [83.9%] White): 1 165 585 (52.0%) with breast cancer, 853 030 (38.1%) with prostate cancer, 130 597 (5.8%) with NSCLC, and 92 494 (4.1%) with colon cancer. Median (interquartile range) TTI by cancer was 32 (21-48) days for breast, 79 (55-117) days for prostate, 41 (27-62) days for NSCLC, and 26 (16-40) days for colon. Across all cancers, a general increase in the 5-year and 10-year predicted mortality was associated with increasing TTI. The most pronounced mortality association was for colon cancer (eg, 5 y predicted mortality, stage III: TTI 61-120 d, 38.9% vs. 181-365 d, 47.8%), followed by stage I NSCLC (5 y predicted mortality: TTI 61-120 d, 47.4% vs 181-365 d, 47.6%), while survival for prostate cancer was least associated (eg, 5 y predicted mortality, high risk: TTI 61-120 d, 12.8% vs 181-365 d, 14.1%), followed by breast cancer (eg, 5 y predicted mortality, stage I: TTI 61-120 d, 11.0% vs. 181-365 d, 15.2%). A nonsignificant difference in treatment delays and worsened survival was observed for stage II lung cancer patients-who had the highest all-cause mortality for any TTI regardless of treatment timing. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, for all studied cancers there was evidence that shorter TTI was associated with lower mortality, suggesting an indirect association between treatment deferral and mortality that may not become evident for years. In contrast to current pandemic-related guidelines, these findings support more timely definitive treatment for intermediate-risk and high-risk prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33315115     DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.30072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Netw Open        ISSN: 2574-3805


  12 in total

1.  ASO Author Reflections: Applying the Counterfactual Approach to Disparities in Breast Cancer Treatment Delays.

Authors:  Margaret C Schermerhorn; Miles W Grunvald; Cristina M O'Donoghue; Ruta D Rao; Adan Z Becerra
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 4.339

2.  Factors Mediating Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Delayed Treatment of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Margaret C Schermerhorn; Miles W Grunvald; Cristina M O'Donoghue; Ruta D Rao; Adan Z Becerra
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 4.339

3.  The patient, diagnostic, and treatment intervals in adult patients with cancer from high- and lower-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dafina Petrova; Zuzana Špacírová; Nicolás Francisco Fernández-Martínez; Ana Ching-López; Dunia Garrido; Miguel Rodríguez-Barranco; Marina Pollán; Daniel Redondo-Sánchez; Carolina Espina; Camila Higueras-Callejón; Maria José Sánchez
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 11.613

4.  Racial differences in the treatment and outcomes for prostate cancer in Massachusetts.

Authors:  Alexander P Cole; Peter Herzog; Hari S Iyer; Maya Marchese; Brandon A Mahal; Stuart R Lipsitz; Joshua Nyambose; Susan T Gershman; Mark Kennedy; Gail Merriam; Timothy R Rebbeck; Quoc-Dien Trinh
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 6.921

5.  Association between timely targeted treatment and outcomes in patients with metastatic HER2-overexpressing gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Kelsey S Lau-Min; Yimei Li; Jennifer R Eads; Ronac Mamtani; Kelly D Getz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 6.921

6.  Pattern of Time-to-Surgery in Patients With Breast Cancer at Different Stages of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Ruixian Chen; Jiqiao Yang; Xin Zhao; Zhoukai Fu; Zhu Wang; Changjian Qiu; Yunhao Wu; Ruoning Yang; Weijing Liu; Ya Huang; Jie Chen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Has the COVID-19 outbreak changed the way we are treating prostate cancer? An EAU - YAU Prostate Cancer Working Group multi-institutional study.

Authors:  Fabio Zattoni; Giancarlo Marra; Alexander Kretschmer; Felix Preisser; Derya Tilki; Claudia Kesch; Jan Philipp Radtke; Nils Hoffmann; Alessandro Morlacco; Fabrizio Dal Moro; Timo F W Soeterik; Roderick C N van den Bergh; Francesco Barletta; Alberto Briganti; Francesco Montorsi; Giorgio Gandaglia
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2021-09-18

8.  [Has the COVID-19 pandemic changed the clinical picture and tumour stage at the time of presentation of patients with colorectal cancer? A retrospective cohort study.]

Authors:  Oscar Cano-Valderrama; Raquel Sánchez-Santos; Vincenzo Vigorita; Marta Paniagua; Erene Flores; Lucia Garrido; Cristina Facal; Alejandro Ruano; Alberto San-Ildefonso; Enrique Moncada
Journal:  Cir Esp       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 1.653

9.  Evaluation of COVID-19 impact on DELAYing diagnostic-therapeutic pathways of lung cancer patients in Italy (COVID-DELAY study): fewer cases and higher stages from a real-world scenario.

Authors:  L Cantini; G Mentrasti; G L Russo; D Signorelli; G Pasello; E Rijavec; M Russano; L Antonuzzo; D Rocco; R Giusti; V Adamo; C Genova; A Tuzi; A Morabito; S Gori; N La Verde; R Chiari; A Cortellini; V Cognigni; F Pecci; A Indini; A De Toma; E Zattarin; S Oresti; E G Pizzutilo; S Frega; E Erbetta; A Galletti; F Citarella; S Fancelli; E Caliman; L Della Gravara; U Malapelle; M Filetti; M Piras; G Toscano; L Zullo; M De Tursi; P Di Marino; V D'Emilio; M S Cona; A Guida; A Caglio; F Salerno; G Spinelli; C Bennati; F Morgillo; A Russo; C Dellepiane; I Vallini; V Sforza; A Inno; F Rastelli; V Tassi; L Nicolardi; V Pensieri; R Emili; E Roca; A Migliore; T Galassi; M L Bruno Rocchi; R Berardi
Journal:  ESMO Open       Date:  2022-02-03

10.  Trends in cancer imaging by indication, care setting, and hospital type during the COVID-19 pandemic and recovery at four hospitals in Massachusetts.

Authors:  Ottavia Zattra; Anthony Fraga; Nancy Lu; Michael S Gee; Raymond W Liu; Michael H Lev; James A Brink; Sanjay Saini; Min Lang; Marc D Succi
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 4.711

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.