Literature DB >> 33313796

Comparison of performance of F1 Romanov crossbred ewes with wool and hair breeds during spring lambing under intensive and extensive production systems.

Brad A Freking1, Tom W Murphy1.   

Abstract

The objective was to evaluate wool (Dorset and Rambouillet) and hair (Dorper, Katahdin, and White Dorper) breeds for their ability to complement Romanov germplasm in two distinct production systems by estimating direct sire and grandsire effects on lamb growth, survival, and ewe productivity traits. Rams of the five breeds (n = 75) were mated to Romanov ewes (n = 459) over a 3-yr period to produce five types of crossbred lambs (n = 2,739). Sire breed (P > 0.06) did not impact body weight or survival traits of the first-generation crossbred (F1) lambs. The productivity of retained crossbred ewes (n = 830) mated to Suffolk and Texel terminal sires was evaluated at 1, 2, and 3 yr of age in each production system. In the intensive production system, labor and harvested feed were provided for sheep that lambed in March in barns, and ewes were limited to rearing two lambs with additional lambs reared artificially. Ewes in the extensive production system lambed in May on pasture and were responsible for rearing all lambs born with no labor or supplemental feed provided before weaning. A total of 1,962 litters and 4,171 lambs from 2,229 exposures to two terminal sire breeds (Suffolk and Texel) were produced in the experiment. Crossbred ewes in the intensive production system were mated in October, resulting in larger litter sizes than crossbred ewes mated in December for the extensive production system. However, single- and twin-born lamb mortality was similar between the two systems that differed greatly in labor, feed, and facilities. Lambs produced in the intensive system received concentrate feed from an early age and were heavier at 24 wk of age than lambs produced in the extensive system. These outcomes resulted in greater 24-wk litter weight in the intensive than in the extensive system (P < 0.0001). Unexpectedly, the relative performance of crossbred types did not differ importantly between production systems. White Dorper × Romanov crossbred ewes had numerical advantages in productivity in each system; however, differences between ewe types were not significant. In the extensive system, without labor and shelter at lambing or supplemental feed until weaning, 3-yr-old crossbred ewes of all types averaged 1.78 lambs marketed per ewe lambing, and 40% of the ewes that gave birth to triplets weaned their entire litters. These results document that prolific sheep and extensive systems can be successfully combined if appropriate crossbred types are used. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breeds; production systems; reproduction; sheep

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33313796      PMCID: PMC7787146          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skaa397

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  16 in total

1.  Evaluation of Columbia, USMARC-Composite, Suffolk, and Texel rams as terminal sires in an extensive rangeland production system: II. Postweaning growth and ultrasonic measures of composition for lambs fed a high-energy feedlot diet.

Authors:  D R Notter; T D Leeds; M R Mousel; J B Taylor; D P Kirschten; G S Lewis
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  A deterministic computer simulation model of life-cycle lamb and wool production.

Authors:  C T Wang; G E Dickerson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Evaluation of Rambouillet, Polypay, and Romanov-White Dorper × Rambouillet ewes mated to terminal sires in an extensive rangeland production system: body weight and wool characteristics1,2.

Authors:  Thomas W Murphy; Whitney C Stewart; David R Notter; Michelle R Mousel; Gregory S Lewis; J Bret Taylor
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Rambouillet and Romanov reciprocal breed effects on survival and growth traits of F1 lambs and on reproductive traits of F1 ewes.

Authors:  Brad A Freking; Gary L Bennett
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Evaluation of Dorset, Finnsheep, Romanov, Texel, and Montadale breeds of sheep: II. Reproduction of F1 ewes in fall mating seasons.

Authors:  E Casas; B A Freking; K A Leymaster
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Simulation of life-cycle efficiency of lamb and wool production for genetic levels of component traits and alternative management options.

Authors:  C T Wang; G E Dickerson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Simulated effects of reproductive performance on life-cycle efficiency of lamb and wool production at three lambing intervals.

Authors:  C T Wang; G E Dickerson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Comparison of Texel- and Suffolk-sired crossbred lambs for survival, growth, and compositional traits.

Authors:  K A Leymaster; T G Jenkins
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Evaluation of Rambouillet, Polypay, and Romanov-White Dorper × Rambouillet ewes mated to terminal sires in an extensive rangeland production system: Lamb production.

Authors:  D R Notter; M R Mousel; G S Lewis; K A Leymaster; J B Taylor
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.159

10.  Effects of rearing triplet lambs on ewe productivity, lamb survival and performance, and future ewe performance.

Authors:  David R Notter; Michelle R Mousel; Timothy D Leeds; Gregory S Lewis; J Bret Taylor
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 3.159

View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparison of performance of F1 Romanov crossbred ewes with wool and hair breeds during fall lambing and body weight and longevity through six production years.

Authors:  Thomas W Murphy; Brad A Freking
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 3.159

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.