| Literature DB >> 33313793 |
Ruth Davies1, Jessica Williams1, Katie Sime1, Hyun-Sun Jin1, Charlotte Thompson1, Lauren Jordan1, Derek Lang2, Julian P Halcox3, Elizabeth Ellins3, Gareth W Jones4, Simon A Jones1, Stefan Rose-John5, Anwen Williams1, Ernest Choy1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Cardiovascular (CV) mortality in RA patients is 50% higher than in the general population. There is increasing recognition that systemic inflammation is a major driver of this. IL-6 is implicated in cardiovascular disease (CVD) in the general population but its role in CVD in RA is undefined. Of the two modes of IL-6 signalling, trans-signalling is pro-inflammatory whereas classical signalling is linked with inflammation resolution. This study examines the role of IL-6 trans-signalling in CVD in a mouse model and patients with RA.Entities:
Keywords: RA; cardiovascular diseases; experimental arthritis; inflammation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33313793 PMCID: PMC8213430 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa725
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rheumatology (Oxford) ISSN: 1462-0324 Impact factor: 7.580
Demographic and clinical data for 182 patients with established RA
| Variables | Values |
|---|---|
| Age, years, mean ( | 60 (1.2) |
| Gender, % | |
| Female | 67 |
| Male | 33 |
| Disease duration, years, mean ( | 13.1 (1.0) |
| Rheumatoid factor positive, % | 63.9 |
| Anti-CCP antibody positive, % | 66.3 |
| CRP, mg/l, mean ( | 11.9 (2.1) |
| ESR, mm/h, mean ( | 22 (1.7) |
| DAS28, mean ( | 3.6 (0.2) |
| Systolic BP, mmHg | 129 (2.2) |
| Cholesterol:HDL ratio, mean ( | 3.8 (0.1) |
| QRISK2, %, mean ( | 16 (1.5) |
| Framingham, %, mean ( | 13 (0.9) |
| Taking any DMARD, % | 70 |
| Taking methotrexate, % | 49 |
| Taking any biologic, % | 21 |
| Taking tocilizumab, % | 10 |
| Taking corticosteroids, % | 22 |
Demographic and clinical data for 45 patients with early RA at baseline
| Variables | Values |
|---|---|
| Age, years, mean ( | 56.1 (2.2) |
| Female, % | 75 |
| Disease duration, months, mean ( | 4.0 (0.2) |
| RF positive, % | 59 |
| Anti-CCP antibody positive, % | 75 |
| CRP, mg/l, mean ( | 11 (2) |
| ESR, mm/h, mean ( | 24 (3) |
| DAS28, mean ( | 3.87 (0.20) |
| Extra articular features, % | 15 |
| Systolic BP, mmHg, mean ( | 136 (3.2) |
| QRISK2, %,mean ( | 16.9 (2.5) |
| QRISK2 >10%, % | 54 |
| Framingham score, %,mean ( | 14.5 (2.2) |
| SCORE, %, mean ( | 1.1 (0.4) |
| Smoking, % | |
| Never smoked | 39.5 |
| Former | 34.9 |
| Current | 25.6 |
| BMI, mean ( | 27.3 (0.9) |
| HbA1c, mmol/mol, mean ( | 40.2 (1) |
| Family history of CVD <60 years, % | 18 |
| Taking any DMARD, % | 63 |
| Taking methotrexate, % | 58 |
| Taking biologics, % | 0 |
| Taking two DMARDs, % | 30 |
| Taking NSAIDs, % | 22 |
| Taking corticosteroids, % | 24 |
Intravenous sgp130Fc reduced arthritis incidence and severity in immunized DBA-1 mice and restored vascular function in CIA
(A) Arthritis incidence and (B) paw score over time for mice immunized with CIA and administered i.v. sgp130Fc, etanercept or PBS. There was a significant reduction in mean total paw score at day 30 in mice administered sgp130Fc or etanercept compared with those administered PBS. (C) Vasoconstriction concentration–response curves to 5-HT in aortic rings. There was a significant reduction in maximal developed tension in mice with CIA administered PBS compared with non-immunized control mice. No significant difference in mean maximal developed tension was seen between sgp130Fc- and etanercept-treated mice and non-immunized controls. n = 10 in each group. *P < 0.05.
sgp130Fc reduced serum CCL2 and sVCAM-1 levels in immunized mice compared with those administered PBS
(A) Significantly higher serum CCL2 was seen in mice with CIA administered PBS or etanercept compared with sgp130Fc and non-immunized controls. n = 9 in each group. (B) Significantly higher serum sVCAM-1 was seen in PBS-treated mice compared with controls, mice administered etanercept and mice administered sgp130Fc. n = 10 in each group. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
Significant positive correlation between the change in CIMT at 6 months and (A) baseline DAS28 (r = 0.50, P = 0.006), (B) baseline CRP (r = 0.51, P = 0.006), (C) baseline QRISK2 (r = 0.42, P = 0.02) and (D) baseline ESR (r = 0.45, P = 0.016).
Significantly higher baseline. (A) total cholesterol [6.7 mmol/L (s.d. 0.2) vs 5.2 (0.3)], (B) cholesterol:HDL ratio [3.7 (s.d. 0.3) vs 5.5 (0.7)], (C) LDL cholesterol [3.1 mmol/L (s.d. 0.3) vs 4.4 (0.3)], (D) sVCAM-1 [734 ng/ml (s.d. 126) vs 1328 (28)] in rapid progressors compared with non-rapid progressors. (E) Significantly lower arterial distension coefficient was seen in rapid progressors [18.8 (s.d. 1.8)] compared with non-rapid progressors [11.2 (s.d. 2.2)].
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.