| Literature DB >> 33313526 |
Steven Yates1, Alexey Mikaberidze2, Simon G Krattinger3, Michael Abrouk3, Andreas Hund4, Kang Yu4, Bruno Studer1, Simone Fouche2, Lukas Meile2, Danilo Pereira2, Petteri Karisto2, Bruce A McDonald2.
Abstract
Accurate, high-throughput phenotyping for quantitative traits is a limiting factor for progress in plant breeding. We developed an automated image analysis to measure quantitative resistance to septoria tritici blotch (STB), a globally important wheat disease, enabling identification of small chromosome intervals containing plausible candidate genes for STB resistance. 335 winter wheat cultivars were included in a replicated field experiment that experienced natural epidemic development by a highly diverse but fungicide-resistant pathogen population. More than 5.4 million automatically generated phenotypes were associated with 13,648 SNP markers to perform the GWAS. We identified 26 chromosome intervals explaining 1.9-10.6% of the variance associated with four independent resistance traits. Sixteen of the intervals overlapped with known STB resistance intervals, suggesting that our phenotyping approach can identify simultaneously (i.e., in a single experiment) many previously defined STB resistance intervals. Seventeen of the intervals were less than 5 Mbp in size and encoded only 173 genes, including many genes associated with disease resistance. Five intervals contained four or fewer genes, providing high priority targets for functional validation. Ten chromosome intervals were not previously associated with STB resistance, perhaps representing resistance to pathogen strains that had not been tested in earlier experiments. The SNP markers associated with these chromosome intervals can be used to recombine different forms of quantitative STB resistance that are likely to be more durable than pyramids of major resistance genes. Our experiment illustrates how high-throughput automated phenotyping can accelerate breeding for quantitative disease resistance.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 33313526 PMCID: PMC7706307 DOI: 10.34133/2019/3285904
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plant Phenomics ISSN: 2643-6515
Figure 1Flow diagram showing steps involved in the acquisition and analysis of phenotype data used in this experiment.
Figure 2Manhattan plots showing significant SNP markers associated with each trait. The horizontal line indicates the Bonferroni-adjusted significance threshold. The A, B, and D genomes of wheat are shown in red, green, and blue, respectively. SNPs associated with the interval IDs shown in Table 1 are indicated in colored circles. (a) Percentage of leaf area covered by lesions (PLACL) had four significant associations distributed across chromosomes 5A, 5B, and 5D. (b) Density of pycnidia within lesions (ρlesion) had 13 significant associations distributed across chromosomes 2B, 4A, 5A, 5D, 6A, 6B, 6D, and 7B. (c) Pycnidia size had a single significant association located on chromosome 2B. (d) Pycnidia melanization had 8 significant associations distributed across chromosomes 1A, 2A, 3B, 4D, 5A, 5B, and 7B.
Chromosomal intervals defined by 26 significant GWAS associations and the phenotypic variance explained by each association. All chromosome intervals and base pair (BP) positions were defined based on the Chinese Spring reference genome (IWGSC 2018). PLACL = percentage of leaf area covered by lesions; PDL = pycnidia density within lesions (ρlesion); MPA = mean pycnidia area (size); PGV = pycnidia gray value; NA = no associations.
| Trait | Interval ID | Chromosome | BP start of interval | BP end of interval | Interval size | SNPs in interval | LOD |
| Other known STB R-genes in this region |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLACL | 1 | 5A | 644275 | 1225606 | 581,331 | 3 | 5.51 | 0.065 | MQTL19 |
| PLACL | 2 | 5A | 20816445 | 20998554 | 182,109 | 4 | 5.95 | 0.068 | MQTL19 |
| PLACL | 3 | 5B | 671238689 | 671360289 | 121,600 | 3 | 5.93 | 0.089 | NA |
| PLACL | 4 | 5D | 1612786 | 2664314 | 1,051,528 | 4 | 9.16 | 0.103 | NA |
| PDL | 5 | 2B | 648912764 | 651932324 | 3,019,560 | 3 | 5.93 | 0.078 | 2 Mbp away from MQTL8 |
| PDL | 6 | 2B | 781584349 | 781830297 | 245,948 | 3 | 5.59 | 0.085 | 5 Mbp away from |
| PDL | 7 | 4A | 648893451 | 658970236 | 10,076,785 | 4 | 6.37 | 0.021 | NA |
| PDL | 8 | 5D | 52615122 | 60899123 | 8,284,001 | 3 | 6.13 | 0.044 | NA |
| PDL | 9 | 5D | 403075850 | 413073376 | 9,997,526 | 3 | 6.19 | 0.066 | NA |
| PDL | 10 | 6A | 411095227 | 415905355 | 4,810,128 | 3 | 6.24 | 0.019 |
|
| PDL | 11 | 6A | 421527350 | 425277806 | 3,750,456 | 5 | 6.47 | 0.091 |
|
| PDL | 12 | 6B | 175719208 | 176403432 | 684,224 | 5 | 5.79 | 0.073 | QStb.6B |
| PDL | 13 | 6B | 453931609 | 455449000 | 1,517,391 | 4 | 6.03 | 0.062 | QStb.6B |
| PDL | 14 | 6B | 462130236 | 468736016 | 6,605,780 | 8 | 6.99 | 0.052 | QStb.6B |
| PDL | 15 | 6B | 472609890 | 474177953 | 1,568,063 | 4 | 7.10 | 0.093 | QStb.6B |
| PDL | 16 | 6D | 394936301 | 406340008 | 11,403,707 | 3 | 5.70 | 0.074 | NA |
| PDL | 17 | 7B | 265441725 | 325980844 | 60,539,119 | 3 | 5.46 | 0.034 | NA |
| MPA | 18 | 2B | 245888219 | 247935045 | 2,046,826 | 3 | 5.50 | 0.059 | MQTL17 |
| PGV | 19 | 1A | 12369332 | 12506454 | 137,122 | 6 | 6.64 | 0.083 | Qstb.1A |
| PGV | 20 | 1A | 472140874 | 472168930 | 28,056 | 4 | 5.53 | 0.063 | NA |
| PGV | 21 | 2A | 635581134 | 639988522 | 4,407,388 | 3 | 6.12 | 0.078 | MQTL15 |
| PGV | 22 | 3B | 30319666 | 32286228 | 1,966,562 | 3 | 5.60 | 0.075 | QStb.3B |
| PGV | 23 | 4D | 485524935 | 502402946 | 16,878,011 | 5 | 8.71 | 0.106 | NA |
| PGV | 24 | 5A | 685438196 | 685537900 | 99,704 | 4 | 5.67 | 0.075 | QTL9 |
| PGV | 25 | 5B | 442374822 | 455735533 | 13,360,711 | 5 | 6.40 | 0.096 |
|
| PGV | 26 | 7B | 65661891 | 83030127 | 17,368,236 | 6 | 6.34 | 0.078 | NA |
Figure 3Positions on the Chinese Spring reference genome (IWGSC 2018) of 26 significant GWAS marker-trait associations across four resistance traits compared to positions of previously mapped STB resistance genes [18]. The 26 associations are shown as numbered circles and a bar (95% confidence interval) in cyan for PLACL, purple for ρlesion, red for pycnidia size, and green for melanization. Confidence intervals of previously mapped STB resistance loci are shown in yellow bars (STB resistance genes) and black bars (STB resistance QTLs). SNP markers are presented as locus names from GrainGenes (https://wheat.pw.usda.gov/GG3/) for brevity. Markers with the prefix Tdurum_contig were abbreviated to TDC. Only SNP markers with significant associations with STB genes, QTLs, or the four phenotypes included in the GWAS are shown. For each association confidence interval, the first and the last SNP and their positions are shown. Names are colored according to the type of association.