Degree of blood pressure control and the risk of new-onset hyperuricemia in treated hypertensive patients.

BACKGROUND: The relationship between blood pressure (BP) control and the risk of new-onset hyperuricemia remains uncertain. We aimed to examine the association between degree of time-averaged on-treatment BP control and new-onset hyperuricemia in general hypertensive patients.
METHODS: A total of 10,617 hypertensive patients with normal uric acid (UA) concentrations (<357 µmol/L) at baseline were included from the UA Sub-study of the China Stroke Primary Prevention Trial (CSPPT). Participants were randomized to receive a double-blind daily treatment of enalapril 10 mg and folic acid 0.8 mg or enalapril 10 mg alone. BP measurements were taken every three months after randomization. The primary outcome was new-onset hyperuricemia, defined as a UA concentration ≥417 µmol/L in men or ≥357 µmol/L in women at the exit visit.
RESULTS: Over a median of 4.4 years, 1,664 (15.7%) participants developed new-onset hyperuricemia. Overall, there was a significantly positive association between time-averaged on-treatment diastolic BP (DBP) and new-onset hyperuricemia (per 10 mmHg increment; OR 1.13; 95% CI: 1.02-1.26). Consistently, a significantly higher risk of new-onset hyperuricemia was found in participants with time-averaged on-treatment DBP ≥82.9 mmHg (median) (vs. <82.9 mmHg; 17.3% vs. 14.1%; OR 1.25; 95% CI: 1.10-1.44). Furthermore, the lowest new-onset hyperuricemia risk (12.1%) was found in those with both time-averaged on-treatment SBP (median: 138.3 mmHg) and DBP below the median (P-interaction=0.023). The results were similar for time-averaged DBP during the first 12- or 24-month treatment period, or in the analysis using propensity scores. Furthermore, a non-significant higher risk of new-onset hyperuricemia was observed in participants with time-averaged on-treatment SBP ≥120 mmHg (vs. <120 mmHg; OR 1.61; 95% CI: 0.88-2.97).
CONCLUSIONS: A tight DBP control of <82.9 mmHg was associated with lower risk of new-onset hyperuricemia among hypertensive patients without hyperuricemia. 2020 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved.

Introduction

Hyperuricemia is characterized by an abnormally elevated concentration of serum uric acid (UA) as a direct result of over-production and/or impaired renal excretion of UA in the body (1,2). The prevalence of hyperuricemia varies substantially worldwide, ranging from about 11.4% to 36% (3-5). In China, 13.3% of the population (almost 170 million) has hyperuricemia and the prevalence of hyperuricemia is increasing, partly owing to population aging (6). Hyperuricemia is not only a strong predictor of gout (1), but is also associated with the risk of cancer, chronic kidney disease, stroke, cardiovascular diseases, and mortality (7-9). Furthermore, previous studies have reported that the reduction of UA had significant reno-protective and cardiovascular protective effects (10-12). Therefore, it is of great significance to identify more modifiable risk factors for hyperuricemia and develop effective primary prevention strategies.

Hypertension is a worldwide public health challenge because of its high burden of comorbidity (cardiovascular, kidney disease, etc.) and limited life expectancy (13,14). To date, some cross-sectional studies have shown that hyperuricemia is more common in patients with hypertension than non-hypertension (15-18). However, although a few longitudinal studies have reported that high blood pressure (BP) is associated with the development of hyperuricemia (19-21), the relationship between BP control and the risk of new-onset hyperuricemia in hypertensive adults remains uncertain.

To address this aforementioned gap, our current study, a post-hoc analysis of data from the UA Sub-study of the China Stroke Primary Prevention Trial (CSPPT) (22), aimed to evaluate the association between degree of time-averaged on-treatment BP control with the risk of new-onset hyperuricemia, and to examine any possible effect modifiers among hypertensive patients. We present the article in accordance with the STROBE reporting checklist (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-3017).

Methods

Study design and participants

The methods and major results of the CSPPT (23-25) and the UA Sub-study of the CSPPT (22) have been described previously. Briefly, the CSPPT was a multi-community, randomized, double-blind, strictly controlled trial conducted from May 19, 2008 to August 24, 2013 in 32 communities in Jiangsu and Anhui provinces of China. Eligible subjects were men and women aged 45–75 years with hypertension, defined as seated, resting systolic BP (SBP) ≥140 mmHg or diastolic BP (DBP) ≥90 mmHg at both the screening and recruitment visit OR who were taking antihypertensive medication. The major exclusion criteria included history of physician-diagnosed stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure, post-coronary revascularization, and/or congenital heart disease.

The UA Sub-study (n=15,364) enrolled CSPPT participants from 20 communities in Jiangsu province, excluding those who were using UA-lowering drugs or with missing UA concentrations at baseline. The current study is a post-hoc analysis of the UA Sub-study.

The parent study (the CSPPT) and the current study were approved by the Ethics Committee of the Institute of Biomedicine, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China (FWA assurance number: FWA00001263) and our study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All participants provided written informed consent.

Intervention and follow-up

The CSPPT consisted of 3 stages: screening and recruitment, a 3-week run-in treatment period, and a 5-year randomized treatment period. During the run-in period, all eligible participants were given a daily enalapril 10 mg tablet for 3 weeks. In the double-blind treatment period, eligible participants were randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, to a double-blind daily treatment of enalapril 10 mg and folic acid 0.8 mg or enalapril 10 mg alone.

The dosage of the study drugs was fixed during the trial. During the run-in and double-blind treatment period, if BP was not adequately controlled, other classes of anti-hypertensive medications could be prescribed concomitantly, according to a pre-specified algorithm. Step 1: (I) enalapril or enalapril-folic acid tablet daily + nitrendipine (10 mg, bid); or (II) enalapril or enalapril-folic acid tablet daily + hydrochlorothiazide (25 mg) daily; Step 2: enalapril or enalapril-folic acid tablet daily + nitrendipine (10 mg, bid) + hydrochlorothiazide (25 mg) daily. In Step 1, nitrendipine was the preferred choice. Alpha-blockers, beta-blockers, angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) and other ACEIs were not recommended. BP control within a normal range (SBP <140 mmHg and DBP <90 mmHg) was not mandatory.

Participants were followed up every three months. At each follow-up visit, BP was measured; study drug compliance, concomitant medication use, adverse events and possible endpoint events were documented by trained research staff and physicians. At the exit visit, final blood samples were collected and assessed.

BP measurements

After participants had rested for 10 minutes, seated BP was measured by trained research staff using a mercury manometer, following the standard method and with appropriately sized cuffs. Triplicate measurements on the same arm were taken, with at least 2 minutes between readings. The mean SBP and DBP of the three independent measures were used in analysis.

BP measurements were taken at baseline, randomization and every 3 months thereafter. Time-averaged on-treatment SBP or DBP was calculated for each participant using all post baseline results up to the last visit [number of BP measurements during the treatment: median, 16; interquartile range (IQR), 12–18]. In additional sensitivity analyses, we also calculated time-averaged on-treatment SBP or DBP using two alternative methods: (I) using the BP measurements from the randomization visit to the 12-month visit (number of BP measurements: median, 5; IQR, 4-5); (II) using the measurements from the randomization visit to the 24-month visit (number of BP measurements: median, 8; IQR, 7–9).

Laboratory assays

Blood samples of all participants were collected at both the baseline and the exit visits. Serum concentrations of UA, total homocysteine (tHcy), lipids, fasting glucose, creatinine, and phosphate were measured using automatic analyzers (Beckman Coulter) at the core laboratory of the National Clinical Research Center for Kidney Disease, Nanfang Hospital, Guangzhou, China. Serum folate was measured by a commercial laboratory with the use of a chemiluminescent immunoassay (New Industrial). The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated by the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (26).

Outcomes

The primary outcome was new-onset hyperuricemia in participants with normal UA concentrations [<357 µmol/L (6 mg/dL)] at baseline. Hyperuricemia was defined as a UA concentration ≥417 µmol/L (7 mg/dL) in men or ≥357 µmol/L (6 mg/dL) in women (22,27).

The secondary outcome was change in UA concentrations, defined as UA concentrations at the exit visit minus that at baseline.

Statistical analyses

Population characteristics are presented as mean±standard deviation (SD) for continuous variables and proportions for categorical variables. Differences in population characteristics by time-averaged on-treatment SBP or DBP quartiles were compared using ANOVA tests, or chi-square tests, accordingly.

The relationship of time-averaged on-treatment SBP or DBP with new-onset hyperuricemia (primary outcome), and change in serum UA concentrations (secondary outcome) was evaluated using multivariable logistic regression models [odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI)] and generalized linear regression models, respectively, without and with adjustment for treatment group, age, sex, body mass index (BMI), UA, fasting glucose, total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), tHcy, folate, eGFR, smoking and drinking status, use of antihypertensive drugs, as well as SBP and DBP at baseline. Furthermore, possible modifications on the association between time-averaged on-treatment DBP (median, <82.9 vs. ≥82.9 mmHg) and new-onset hyperuricemia were also evaluated by stratified analyses and interaction testing.

Propensity scores analysis

As additional sensitivity analyses, we further evaluated our results in the analysis using propensity score matching method. A non-parsimonious propensity score using variables that might affect BP control or new-onset hyperuricemia was developed to predict the likelihood a participant would be in the different degree of time-averaged on-treatment SBP (median, <138.3 vs. ≥138.3 mmHg) or DBP (median, <82.9 vs. ≥82.9 mmHg) control. Participants in the 2 groups with different degree of time-averaged on-treatment BP control were matched 1:1 based on propensity scores. Nearest-neighbor with caliper distance of 0.05 was used for the matching. Standardized differences of post-matched participant characteristics ≤10% between the 2 groups was considered to be balanced.

A two-tailed P<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant in all analyses. Statistical analyses were conducted using R software, version 3.5.0.

Results

Characteristics of study participants

As illustrated in the flow chart (Figure S1), of the 15,364 participants in the UA Sub-study of CSPPT, the final UA measurement at the exit visit was obtained for 13,163 (85.7%). Participants without UA concentrations at the exit visit did not differ substantially in baseline characteristics from those with UA concentrations (Table S1). Of the 13,163 participants, a total of 10,617 subjects, who did not use UA-lowing drugs during the treatment period, as well as whose baseline UA levels were <357 µmol/L in the UA Sub-study of the CSPPT were included in the final analyses.

The median time-averaged on-treatment SBP or DBP was 138.3 and 82.9 mmHg, respectively. Baseline characteristics of the participants by time-averaged on-treatment SBP or DBP quartiles are summarized in Table S2 and , respectively. Time-averaged on-treatment DBP was positively associated with male sex, BMI, current smoking, current alcohol drinking, SBP, DBP, eGFR, UA and antihypertensive drug usage; and was inversely associated with age, TC, folate, phosphate concentrations, fasting glucose, glucose-lowering drug usage and the prevalence of self-reported diabetes (). Similar trends were found for time-averaged on-treatment SBP (Table S2).

Table 1

Characteristics of study participants according to quartiles of time-averaged on-treatment DBP

Characteristics	Time-averaged on-treatment DBP, mmHg				P value
	Q1 (<78.5) (n=2,654)	Q2 (78.5 to <82.9) (n=2,654)	Q3 (82.9 to <87.5) (n=2,654)	Q4 (≥87.5) (n=2,655)
Age, years	63.5±6.7	60.2±7.1	58.4±6.9	55.7±6.8	<0.001
Male, n (%)	705 (26.6)	767 (28.9)	859 (32.4)	1,019 (38.4)	<0.001
BMI, kg/m2	24.7±3.3	25.3±3.4	25.8±3.5	26.3±3.6	<0.001
Current smoking, n (%)	502 (18.9)	433 (16.3)	493 (18.6)	614 (23.1)	<0.001
Current alcohol drinking, n (%)	409 (15.4)	439 (16.5)	507 (19.1)	619 (23.3)	<0.001
Self-reported hyperlipidemia, n (%)	66 (2.5)	71 (2.7)	71 (2.7)	84 (3.2)	0.476
Self-reported diabetes, n (%)	162 (6.1)	124 (4.7)	82 (3.1)	45 (1.7)	<0.001
Enalapril only treatment, n (%)	1,327 (50.0)	1,340 (50.5)	1,322 (49.8)	1,335 (50.3)	0.963
MTHFR C677T genotypes, n (%)					0.850
CC	635 (23.9)	619 (23.3)	595 (22.4)	617 (23.2)
CT	1,332 (50.2)	1,330 (50.1)	1,346 (50.7)	1,315 (49.5)
TT	687 (25.9)	705 (26.6)	713 (26.9)	723 (27.2)
Blood pressure, mmHg
Baseline SBP	167.3±19.8	167.2±19.6	168.3±20.4	172.9±22.9	<0.001
Baseline DBP	85.7±9.6	93.0±9.2	97.4±9.3	103.8±11.2	<0.001
Time-averaged on-treatment SBP	135.1±10.0	136.6±9.5	139.1±9.1	146.2±11.1	<0.001
Time-averaged on-treatment DBP	74.6±3.4	80.8±1.2	85.1±1.3	92.4±4.5	<0.001
Laboratory results
Total cholesterol, mmol/L	5.7±1.2	5.8±1.2	5.7±1.1	5.6±1.2	<0.001
Triglycerides, mmol/L	1.7±0.9	1.6±0.8	1.71.4±0.9	1.7±2.1	0.051
Folate, ng/mL	7.7±3.3	7.8±3.3	7.7±3.3	7.6±3.0	0.040
Fasting glucose, mmol/L	6.3±2.2	6.1±1.9	6.0±1.6	5.9±1.6	<0.001
Total homocysteine, μmol/L	14.0±7.4	14.0±8.2	14.1±8.8	14.1±8.8	0.980
eGFR, mL/min/1.73 m2	92.7±11.7	94.4±11.8	96.1±11.3	97.6±11.7	<0.001
Uric acid, μmol/L	260.4±52.3	262.5±51.2	266.1±52.1	270.8±51.9	<0.001
Phosphate, mg/dL	4.1±0.7	4.1±0.7	4.0±0.7	4.0±0.8	<0.001
Medication use, n (%)
Antihypertensive drugs	1,179 (44.4)	1,248 (47.0)	1,295 (48.8)	1,346 (50.7)	<0.001
Lipid-lowering drugs	20 (0.8)	23 (0.9)	25 (0.9)	22 (0.8)	0.900
Glucose-lowering drugs	80 (3.0)	63 (2.4)	46 (1.7)	16 (0.6)	<0.001
Antiplatelet drugs	89 (3.4)	89 (3.4)	111 (4.2)	101 (3.8)	0.307

Variables are presented as mean ± SD or n (%). BMI, body mass index; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; MTHFR, 5, 10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase; SBP, systolic blood pressure.

Time-averaged on-treatment BP and risk of study outcomes

Over a median follow-up duration of 4.4 years, new-onset hyperuricemia occurred in 1,664 (15.7%) patients.

The association between time-averaged on-treatment DBP and new-onset hyperuricemia is presented in . Overall, there was a significant positive association between time-averaged on-treatment DBP and the risk of new-onset hyperuricemia (per 10 mmHg increment; OR 1.13; 95% CI: 1.02–1.26) (). When time-averaged on-treatment DBP was assessed as quartiles, a significantly higher risk of new-onset hyperuricemia was found in participants with time-averaged on-treatment DBP ≥82.9 mmHg (median) (vs. <82.9 mmHg; 17.3% vs. 14.1%; OR 1.25; 95% CI: 1.10–1.44) (). Similar results were found for change in serum UA concentrations (secondary outcome) (, Table S3) and the exit UA concentrations (Figure S2).

Figure 1

Relationship of time-averaged on-treatment diastolic blood pressure (DBP) with new-onset hyperuricemia (A) and change in uric acid concentrations (B)*. *, adjusted for treatment group, age, sex, BMI, UA, fasting glucose, total cholesterol, TG, tHcy, folate, eGFR, smoking and drinking status, use of antihypertensive drugs, and SBP and DBP at baseline.

Table 2

Association between time-averaged on-treatment blood pressure and new-onset hyperuricemia

Time-averaged on-treatment blood pressure, mmHg	Events/N (%)	Crude model			Adjusted model*
		OR (95% CI)	P value		OR (95% CI)	P value
Time-averaged on-treatment SBP, mmHg
Per 10 mmHg increment	1,664/10,617 (15.7)	1.19 (1.14–1.25)	<0.001		0.98 (0.93–1.04)	0.528
Quartiles
Q1 (<131.7)	332/2,654 (12.5)	Ref.			Ref.
Q2 (131.7 to <138.3)	389/2,654 (14.7)	1.20 (1.03–1.41)	0.025		1.00 (0.85–1.19)	0.968
Q3 (138.3 to <145.6)	446/2,654 (16.8)	1.41 (1.21–1.65)	<0.001		1.03 (0.87–1.23)	0.700
Q4 (≥145.6)	497/2,655 (18.7)	1.61 (1.39–1.87)	<0.001		0.95 (0.79–1.13)	0.547
P for trend		<0.001			0.607
Medians
Q1–2 (<138.3)	721/5,308 (13.6)	Ref.			Ref.
Q3–4 (≥138.3)	943/5,309 (17.8)	1.37 (1.24–1.53)	<0.001		0.99 (0.88–1.12)	0.877
Time-averaged on-treatment DBP, mmHg
Per 10 mmHg increment	1,664/10,617 (15.7)	1.16 (1.08–1.25)	<0.001		1.13 (1.02–1.26)	0.021
Quartiles
Q1 (<78.5)	394/2,654 (14.8)	Ref.			Ref.
Q2 (78.5 to <82.9)	354/2,654 (13.3)	0.88 (0.76–1.03)	0.115		0.91 (0.76–1.08)	0.261
Q3 (82.9 to <87.5)	431/2,654 (16.2)	1.11 (0.96–1.29)	0.161		1.14 (0.95–1.36)	0.154
Q4 (≥87.5)	485/2,655 (18.3)	1.28 (1.11–1.48)	<0.001		1.25 (1.02–1.53)	0.029
P for trend		<0.001			0.004
Medians
Q1–2 (<82.9)	748/5,308 (14.1)	Ref.			Ref.
Q3–4 (≥82.9)	916/5,309 (17.3)	1.27 (1.14–1.41)	<0.001		1.25 (1.10–1.44)	<0.001

*, adjusted for treatment group, age, sex, BMI, UA, fasting glucose, total cholesterol, TG, tHcy, folate, eGFR, smoking and drinking status, use of antihypertensive drugs, and SBP and DBP at baseline.

Consistently, when modeled as clinical categories, compared with participants with time-averaged on-treatment DBP <85 mmHg, the adjusted odds ratios (95% CI) for participants with time-averaged DBP 85 to <90, and ≥90 mmHg were 1.16 (95% CI: 0.99–1.34) and 1.33 (95% CI: 1.11–1.59) (P for trend =0.001), respectively. Accordingly, a significantly higher risk of new-onset hyperuricemia was observed in participants with time-averaged DBP ≥85 mmHg (OR 1.21; 95% CI: 1.06–1.39), compared with those with time-averaged DBP <85 mmHg (Table S4).

In addition, there were significant differences in the use of calcium channel blockers, diuretics, and glucose-lowering drugs during the treatment period among those with different time-averaged on-treatment DBP levels (Table S5). However, further adjustment for concomitant use of calcium channel blockers, diuretics and glucose-lowering drugs during the treatment period did not substantially change the results (Table S6). Moreover, further adjustment for treatment (enalapril or enalapril-folic acid) compliance (Table S7), change in eGFR (Table S8), or change in BMI (Table S9) during the treatment period also did not essentially affect the results. The similar results were also observed when UA concentrations <417 µmol/L for male and <357 µmol/L for female at baseline were included the analysis (Table S10).

Overall, there was no significant association between time-averaged on-treatment SBP and the primary or secondary outcomes (, Table S3, Figure S3). Nevertheless, compared with those with time-averaged on-treatment SBP <120 mmHg, a non-significant higher risk of new-onset hyperuricemia was observed in participants with time-averaged on-treatment SBP ≥120 mmHg (OR 1.61; 95% CI: 0.88–2.97) (Table S11).

Time-averaged BP during the first 12-month or 24-month treatment period and subsequent new-onset hyperuricemia

When time-averaged DBP during the first 12-month treatment period was assessed as quartiles, the adjusted ORs (95% CI) for participants in the third (84.5 to <89.7 mmHg) and fourth quartiles (≥89.7 mmHg) were 1.17 (0.97–1.40) and 1.27 (1.04–1.55), respectively, compared with participants in quartile 1 (<79.6 mmHg; P for trend =0.024) (Table S12).

When time-averaged DBP during the first 24-month treatment period was assessed as quartiles, the adjusted ORs (95%CI) for participants in the third (83.8 to <88.6 mmHg) and fourth quartiles (≥88.6 mmHg) were 1.26 (1.05–1.51) and 1.29 (1.05–1.58), respectively, compared with participants in quartile 1 (<79.0 mmHg; P for trend =0.001) (Table S13).

Stratified analyses by potential effect modifiers

A stronger, positive association was observed between time-averaged on-treatment DBP (median, <82.9 vs. ≥82.9 mmHg) and new-onset hyperuricemia among participants with lower time-averaged on-treatment SBP (median: <138.3; OR 1.48; 95% CI: 1.23–1.78; vs. ≥138.3 mmHg; OR 1.13; 95% CI: 0.94–1.35; P-interaction =0.023) (). That is to say, the lowest new-onset hyperuricemia risk (12.1%) was found in those with both lower DBP and lower SBP levels.

Figure 2

Stratified analyses of the association between time-averaged on-treatment DBP (median, <82.9 vs. ≥82.9 mmHg) and new-onset hyperuricemia*. *, adjusted, if not stratified, for treatment group, age, sex, BMI, UA, fasting glucose, total cholesterol, TG, tHcy, folate, eGFR, smoking and drinking status, use of antihypertensive drugs, and SBP and DBP at baseline.

None of the other variables, including sex, age (<65 vs. ≥65 years), treatment group (enalapril vs. enalapril-folic acid), BMI (median: <25.3 vs. ≥25.3 kg/m2), SBP (median: <166.0 vs. ≥166.0 mmHg), DBP (median: <94.7 vs. ≥94.7 mmHg), serum UA concentrations (median: <267 vs. ≥267 µmol/L), eGFR (<60 vs. 60 to <90 vs. ≥90 mL/min/1.73 m2), smoking (never vs. former vs. current), drinking (never vs. former vs. current), TC (median: <5.6 vs. ≥5.6 mmol/L), tHcy (<15 vs. ≥15 µmol/L), diabetes (no vs. yes) and phosphate concentrations (median: <4.0 vs. ≥4.0 mg/dL) at baseline, as well as diuretics usage during the treatment period (no vs. yes) significantly modified the association between time-averaged on-treatment DBP (median, <82.9 vs. ≥82.9 mmHg) and the risk of new-onset hyperuricemia (All P-interactions >0.05) (, Figure S4).

After propensity score matching, 6,670 participants (3,335 in each group) were included in the analysis for SBP & new-onset hyperuricemia association, and 5,346 participants (2,673 in each group) were included in the analysis for DBP & new-onset hyperuricemia association. Candidate variables used in the development of the propensity score have been listed in Table S14. All the post-matched participant characteristics were highly balanced (Table S14, Figures S5,S6). Consistently, a significantly higher risk of new-onset hyperuricemia was found in participants with time-averaged on-treatment DBP ≥82.9 mmHg (median) (vs. <82.9 mmHg; 16.1% vs. 13.6%; OR 1.20; 95% CI: 1.04–1.40). However, there was no significant relation of time-averaged on-treatment SBP with new-onset hyperuricemia ().

Table 3

Association between time-averaged on-treatment blood pressure and new-onset hyperuricemia in the propensity scores matching analysis

Time-averaged on-treatment blood pressure, mmHg	Events/N (%)	OR (95%CI)	P
Time-averaged on-treatment SBP, mmHg
Q1–2 (<138.3)	539/3,335 (16.2)	Ref.
Q3–4 (≥138.3)	497/3,335 (14.9)	0.91 (0.80–1.04)	0.156
Time-averaged on-treatment DBP, mmHg
Q1–2 (<82.9)	364/2,673 (13.6)	Ref.
Q3–4 (≥82.9)	430/2,673 (16.1)	1.20 (1.04–1.40)	0.016

DBP, diastolic blood pressure; SBP, systolic blood pressure.

Discussion

Our current study demonstrated that a tight DBP control of <82.9 mmHg was associated with a lower risk of new-onset hyperuricemia among treated hypertensive patients without hyperuricemia, especially in those with lower time-averaged on-treatment SBP during the treatment period.

A few prospective studies (19-21) have assessed the association between BP and the risk of hyperuricemia. Ryu et al. (19) found that participants with hypertension had a higher incidence of hyperuricemia in middle-aged South Korean men. Consistently, Nakanishi et al. (21) reported that high mean BP was a contributory factor in the development of hyperuricemia in hyperuricemia-free Japanese men. Kuwabara et al. (20) also demonstrated that hypertension was one of the risk factors for developing hyperuricemia in Japanese adults. However, few studies have been conducted to evaluate the association between BP control and the risk of hyperuricemia. The current report was motivated by the limited data available regarding the relationship between BP control and new-onset hyperuricemia in general hypertensive patients, and was further prompted by the opportunity to utilize data from a large, randomized controlled trial on patients with regular antihypertensive treatment and BP measurements to address this knowledge gap.

Our study first found that a better DBP control was associated with a lower risk of new-onset hyperuricemia among hypertensive patients, independent of multiple confounding factors including BMI, alcohol drinking, eGFR, BP, UA at baseline, as well as diuretic usage, and change in eGFR and BMI during the treatment period. While biological mechanisms underlying our observed BP control-new onset hyperuricemia association remain to be determined, our findings are biologically plausible. First, hypertension may result in renal vascular resistance accompanied by reduction in renal blood flow (28). As renal blood flow decreases, an increase in proximal sodium and UA absorption occurs, which may contribute to increasing serum UA levels (19,29,30). Consistently, it has been reported that the administration of angiotensin II reduces renal urate clearance in combination with a significant decrease in renal blood flow (2,28,31-33). Furthermore, Messerli et al. (18) reported an inverse association between renal blood flow and UA levels, and a positive relation of renal vascular resistance with UA concentrations in a study on general hypertensive patients. Second, microvascular damage associated with hypertension may result in local tissue ischemia (29). In ischemic conditions, adenosine triphosphate is degraded to adenine and xanthine, and the conversion of xanthine dehydrogenase to xanthine oxidase is simultaneously increased, which leads to increased UA production (2,30,33-35). Overall, renal microvascular damage and intrarenal ischemia may contribute to the major explanation for the high, new-onset hyperuricemia burden in hypertensive patients. We speculate that BP control may decrease microvascular resistance or damage, improve renal blood flow and tissue ischemia, and therefore, reduce the risk of new-onset hyperuricemia. Of note, showed that the relation of time-averaged DBP with new-onset hyperuricemia seemed to be “S” shaped. That is to say, the beneficial effect of BP reduction on new-onset hyperuricemia may reach a plateau in those with relatively optimal BP levels. On the other hand, we speculated that when there has already been a relatively serious renal microvascular damage associated with high BP, the impaired renal blood flow and intrarenal ischemia could not continuously increase with the further increment of BP, and, therefore, there may be a plateau, but not a continuously increased new-onset hyperuricemia risk. Future studies are warrened to further examine the findings and the underlying mechanisms of BP control on the risk of hyperuricemia.

However, our study found no significant association between time-averaged on-treatment SBP during the treatment period and hyperuricemia risk. The possible explanations included, first, elevated SBP is mainly associated with large artery stiffness, while DBP rises with increases in peripheral vascular resistance (36). As such, at a given sample size, DBP control may possibly have a greater effect on renal blood flow and change in UA levels, and therefore we mainly observed the significant association between DBP control and new-onset hyperuricemia in our current study. Second, we really found a non-significant increased risk of new-onset hyperuricemia in participants with time-averaged on-treatment SBP ≥120 mmHg (vs. <120 mmHg; OR 1.61; 95% CI: 0.88–2.97). Because only few participants (1.7%) reached a time-averaged on-treatment SBP goal of <120 mmHg, these results may just indicate that our current study was underpowered for evaluating the relation of time-averaged SBP <120 mmHg (vs. ≥120 mmHg) with new-onset hyperuricemia. Of note, in the stratified analysis (), the lowest new-onset hyperuricemia risk was found in those with both lower DBP and lower SBP levels. These results suggested that a relatively stricter both SBP and DBP control may lead to a greater reduction of new-onset hyperuricemia in general hypertensive patients. However, more studies are needed to verify our results and hypothesis.

Some limitations of the current study should be noted. First, this was a post-hoc analysis of the UA Sub-study of the CSPPT. Although a broad array of covariates has been adjusted for in the regression models, we cannot exclude residual confounding from unmeasured risk factors. Second, serum UA concentrations were only assessed at the baseline and exit visits. More frequent measurements of serum UA would have allowed for a more accurate assessment of the relation of BP control and new-onset hyperuricemia. Third, in the CSPPT, all participants used enalapril during the treatment period. The generalizability of our results to hypertensive adults without the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors remains to be determined. Fourth, although the positive relation of UA levels with risk of stroke and mortality in previous studies (8), our current study did not find the significant association between baseline UA and first stroke (per SD increment; HR, 0.98, 95% CI: 0.88–1.09) (Figure S7A). However, our study found a positive association between baseline UA and all-cause mortality (per SD increment; HR, 1.15, 95% CI: 1.03–1.29) (Figure S7B). Therefore, the association between UA levels and cardiovascular diseases in treated hypertensive patients still should be further investigated in future studies. Fifth, our study mainly suggested that a tight BP control was associated with lower risk of new-onset hyperuricemia. However, our study was underpowered to detect the optimal BP levels for the new-onset hyperuricemia. Due to these limitations, our results should be regarded as hypothesis generating. Confirmation of our findings in a large-scale clinical trial of participants who are randomized to different on-treatment SBP targets is essential.

Conclusions

In conclusion, there was a positive association between DBP control and the risk of new-onset hyperuricemia in treated hypertensive adults. If further confirmed, our data provide some evidence for the adoption of stricter BP goals in general hypertensive patients for preventing hyperuricemia. These findings could have important implications for clinical practice and guidelines.

The article’s supplementary files as