Literature DB >> 33313173

Incidence trends and survival outcomes of penile squamous cell carcinoma: evidence from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results population-based data.

Feng Qi1, Xiyi Wei2, Yuxiao Zheng1, Xiaohan Ren2, Xiao Li1, Erkang Zhao3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To provide the latest incidence trends and explore survival outcomes of penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) patients with or without a previous primary malignancy.
METHODS: Patients diagnosed with PSCC between 1975 and 2016 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were retrospectively included. Then, we calculated the age-adjusted incidence rates (IRs) and annual percentage changes (APCs). Multivariate Cox analysis and Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival curves were conducted to investigate prognostic variables for cancer-specific survival (CSS).
RESULTS: A total of 6,122 PSCC patients were enrolled, 1,137 of whom had a prior malignancy. The age-adjusted IR for the general population in men declined before 1987, fluctuated slightly between 1987 and 1997, and showed an upward trend after 1997, which was basically consistent with that in patients without a previous primary malignancy. The incidence trend of PSCC in the general population was similar with that in those without a previous malignancy. However, the IRs of PSCC in men with a previous malignancy have been increasing since 1975 regardless of race. Furthermore, age at diagnosis, pathological grade, extent of disease, marital status, the administration of surgery and presence of previous primary malignancy were identified to be significantly related to CSS.
CONCLUSIONS: The IRs of PSCC have been increasing in recent years. Several independent prognostic factors for CSS were identified, allowing surgeons to assess the individualized risk in advance. 2020 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC); Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database; incidence; prognosis

Year:  2020        PMID: 33313173      PMCID: PMC7723588          DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-1802

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Transl Med        ISSN: 2305-5839


Introduction

Penile cancer, accounting for approximately 0.3% of all male malignant tumors, is a rare urological malignant tumor. The estimated new cases and deaths of penile cancer in 2018 were 34,475 and 15,138 globally (1). The most common type of penile cancer is squamous cell carcinoma. Moreover, the incidence of penile cancer is closely related to the prevalence of human papilloma virus (HPV), which may be an important cause of the variation in incidence. In Uganda, penile cancer is the most common male malignancy, particularly in the uncircumcised ethnic groups (2,3). Although the pathogenesis of penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) is still unclear, previous studies have found many potential risk factors, including phimosis, HPV infection, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, balanitis, excessive sexual partners, and immunodeficiency. Meanwhile, tobacco use, age and race may also be associated with the development of PSCC (4-11). In the past few decades, the prognosis of advanced penile cancer has been poor (12,13). The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates for regional and distant PSCC diseases were only 50% and 12% between 2009 and 2015 (https://www.cancer.org/cancer/penile-cancer/detection-diagnosis-staging/survival-rates.html). Therefore, it is critical to investigate the risk predictors and prognostic factors for PSCC patients. Currently, most studies (14,15) on PSCC are case reports or retrospective studies based on small populations due to the rarity of PSCC itself. Moreover, only few studies have been performed to evaluate the temporal incidence trends and survival outcomes of PSCC. The Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Result (SEER) program is a large population-based database that collects cancer cases in the United States. It contains detailed information on cancer incidence, mortality and prognosis of approximately 30% of the US population. We conducted this study based on the SEER database to investigate the latest incidence trends and survival outcomes of patients with PSCC. We present the following article in accordance with the PRISMA reporting checklist (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-1802).

Methods

Database

Original data of this study were collected from the SEER database. The SEER registry is a public registry supported by the National Cancer Institute (NCI). SEER 9 included data from nine registries in Connecticut, Hawaii, Iowa, New Mexico, Utah, Detroit (Michigan), San Francisco Oakland (California), Seattle-Puget Sound (Washington) and Atlanta (Georgia) since 1975. SEER 13 collected cancer cases diagnosed since 1992 with four additional registries [Alaska Natives, Los Angeles, San Jose-Monterey (California) and rural Georgia]. At the beginning of the 21st century, SEER 18 was developed with five new registries added (including Greater California, Greater Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana and New Jersey). Data agreement was signed before this study with the username of 15440-Nov2018. This study was exempt from Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval because the original data were from a public database.

Patient identification

In this study, patients diagnosed with PSCC were respectively extracted from SEER 18 using the “Case Listing Session”. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (I) diagnosed as PSCC (International Classification of Diseases for Oncology: C60.0-Prepuce, C60.1-Glans penis, C60.2-Body of penis, C60.8-Overlapping lesion of penis and C60.9-Penis, NOS. Histologic Type: 8050-8089) with microscopical confirmation; (II) complete data were available with active follow-up; (III) type of reporting source was not autopsy only or death certificate only; (IV) cancer patients (behavior =3); (V) male sex. Age at diagnosis was mainly categorized into <35, 35–49, 50–64, 65–79 and ≥80 years old. Primary tumor site was classified into prepuce, glans penis, body of penis, overlapping lesion of penis and not specified. Extent of disease was designated as distant, regional and localized. Race was coded as white, black, or other. The included patients were further divided into two groups based on the existence of a previous primary malignancy.

Incidence rates (IRs) and annual percent changes

We calculated the age-adjusted IRs between 1975–2016 using the “Rate Session” function (SEER 9 for 1975–1991, SEER 13 for 1992–1999, and SEER 18 for 2000–2016). A 5-year latency was utilized in the development of temporal trend figures. Additionally, annual percent changes (APCs) were calculated to identify the trends of age-adjusted IRs in different groups.

Survival outcomes

Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were conducted to explore independent factors which affected cancer-specific survival (CSS) significantly. Co-variates of interest included age at diagnosis, presence of a previous primary cancer, race, decades of diagnosis, primary tumor site, extent of disease, pathological grade, the administration of surgery and so on. Year of diagnosis was divided into 1975–1984, 1985–1994, 1995–2004, 2005–2016 with 10 years as an interval. Furthermore, based on the results of multivariate Cox analyses, survival curves for different variables were produced by Kaplan-Meier (KM) analyses.

Statistical methods

Age-adjusted IRs were calculated based on the 2000 U.S. standard population using the SEER*Stat software (Version 8.3.6; www.seer.cancer.gov/seerstat). Chi-square tests were utilized to compare categorical variables. Multivariate Cox-proportional hazards analyses were applied to investigate independent factors for CSS. Furthermore, survival curves for different variables were produced by KM analyses. Data were analyzed using SPSS 23.0 software (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA) and R software (Version 3.4.1). In addition, APCs were calculated using Joinpoint Regression Program (https://surveillance.cancer.gov/joinpoint/). Two-sided P<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant during the whole analysis process.

Results

A total of 6,122 patients with PSCC were identified from the SEER 18 database, 1,137 of whom had at least a prior malignancy. As shown in , those with a prior primary cancer were more likely to be older (P<0.001), white race (P=0.001), diagnosed in the last decade (P<0.001) and had worse differentiation (P=0.001). The most common site of PSCC was glans penis (33.02% and 33.42% for patients without/with a prior primary cancer, respectively). More localized diseases were identified in patients with a prior primary cancer (P=0.033). However, blank or ambiguous data existed in many patients in specific variables, such as primary tumor site, pathological grade and extent of disease. After eliminating these meaningless interference data, we found that there were no significant differences in extent of disease between two groups of patients with and without a prior malignancy (details were shown in Table S1). The most important treatment type was surgery for all patients (72.50% and 78.63% for patients without/with a prior primary cancer, respectively).
Table 1

Demographic characteristics of patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma based on existence of a prior primary from SEER 18

VariableTotalNo primary, n (%)Previous primary, n (%)P value
N6,1224,985 (81.43)1,137 (18.57)
Age at diagnosis, years<0.001
   <35116112 (2.24)4 (0.35)
   35–49670633 (12.70)37 (3.25)
   50–641,7891,600 (32.10)189 (16.62)
   65–792,3771,838 (36.87)539 (47.41)
   ≥801,170802 (16.09)368 (32.37)
Race0.001
   White5,1034,134 (82.93)969 (85.22)
   Black671545 (10.93)126 (11.08)
   Other (AI/AK, A/PI)292250 (5.02)42 (3.69)
   Unknown5656 (1.12)0 (0.00)
Year at diagnosis<0.001
   1975–1981297276 (5.54)21 (1.85)
   1982–1988306273 (5.48)33 (2.90)
   1989–1995439395 (7.92)44 (3.87)
   1996–2002961804 (16.13)157 (13.81)
   2003–20091,8131,458 (29.25)355 (31.22)
   2010–20162,3061,779 (35.69)527 (46.35)
Primary site0.004
   Prepuce792679 (13.62)113 (9.94)
   Glans penis2,0261,646 (33.02)380 (33.42)
   Body of penis278220 (4.41)58 (5.10)
   Overlapping lesion of penis237202 (4.05)35 (3.08)
   Penis, NOS2,7892,238 (44.89)551 (48.46)
Pathological grade0.001
   Grade I1,5771,329 (26.66)248 (21.81)
   Grade II2,3281,910 (38.31)418 (36.76)
   Grade III1,075843 (16.91)232 (20.40)
   Grade IV3629 (0.58)7 (0.62)
   Unknown1,106874 (17.53)232 (20.40)
Material status<0.001
   Married3,4502,795 (56.07)655 (57.61)
   Previous married1,216954 (19.140)262 (23.04)
   Never married961838 (16.81)123 (10.82)
   Unknown495398 (7.98)97 (8.53)
Extent of disease0.033
   Localized3,5192,847 (57.11)672 (59.10)
   Regional1,7601,458 (29.25)302 (26.56)
   Distant298253 (5.08)45 (3.96)
   Unstaged545427 (8.57)118 (10.38)
Surgery<0.001
   Unknown/no1,6141,371 (27.50)243 (21.37)
   Yes4,5083,614 (72.50)894 (78.63)

Grade I, well differentiated; Grade II, moderately differentiated; Grade III, poorly differentiated; Grade IV, undifferentiated; anaplastic.

Grade I, well differentiated; Grade II, moderately differentiated; Grade III, poorly differentiated; Grade IV, undifferentiated; anaplastic.

IRs and annual percentage changes (APCs) in PSCC

show the case counts and IRs for PSCC by racial group and age group. As shown in , the age-adjusted IR declined before 1987 and fluctuated slightly between 1987 and 1997 for male population. After 1997, it showed an upward trend. For patients without a previous primary malignancy, the age-adjusted IR was basically consistent with that of the general population. However, for those with previous a previous malignancy, the overall incidence has been increasing slowly.
Table 2

Case counts and incidence rates for penile squamous cell carcinoma by racial group and age group, SEER 9 (1975–1991)

TotalWhiteBlackOther
RateCountsPopulationRateCountsPopulationRateCountsPopulationRateCountsPopulation
Total0.534729183,707,3550.514604151,716,6681.07010618,371,4550.1911713,619,232
   No primary0.479665183,707,3550.460550151,716,6680.9709718,371,4550.1821613,619,232
   Previous primary0.05464183,707,3550.05454151,716,6680.101918,371,4550.009113,619,232
Age group
   No primary
    <350.00910108,234,6730.006687,299,6720.009112,353,8990.02528,581,102
    35–490.2177134,138,5990.2045628,689,1630.405123,026,5490.13932,422,887
    50–640.88522824,849,2340.84818821,378,6401.894371,903,1890.17131,567,405
    65–792.10127613,652,4552.02723111,834,4404.23738934,2940.7496883,721
    ≥802.862802,832,3942.789692,514,7535.7579153,5241.2642164,117
   Previous primary
    <350.0011108,234,6730.001187,299,6720.000012,353,8990.00008,581,102
    35–490.009334,138,5990.007228,689,1630.03813,026,5490.00002,422,887
    50–640.0431124,849,2340.037821,378,6400.09821,903,1890.06211,567,405
    65–790.2012713,652,4550.1852211,834,4400.6195934,2940.0000883,721
    ≥800.807222,832,3940.873212,514,7530.5821153,5240.0000164,117
Table 3

Case counts and incidence rates for penile squamous cell carcinoma by racial group and age group, SEER 13 (1992–1999)

TotalWhiteBlackAI/ANA/PI
RateCountsPopulationRateCountsPopulationRateCountsPopulationRateCountsPopulationRateCountsPopulation
Total0.533587146,538,7600.533484113,891,8600.7936415,668,6890.94582,133,0750.2382514,845,136
   No primary0.453504146,538,7600.451413113,891,8600.6715515,668,6890.94582,133,0750.2042214,845,136
   Previous primary0.08183146,538,7600.08371113,891,8600.123915,668,6890.00002,133,0750.034314,845,136
Age group
   No primary
    <350.0191680,593,6840.0201360,997,1310.01019,754,8200.00001,420,1500.00008,421,583
    35–490.2006634,039,8190.1915026,825,8030.388123,361,8440.2391430,3420.09233,421,830
    50–640.71513218,361,4150.73210914,805,4810.751121,594,8391.0472193,5410.45381,767,554
    65–791.86519810,850,9631.8261618,978,3892.97422795,0073.282373,2551.052101,004,312
    ≥803.474922,692,8793.505802,285,0565.5478162,17912.801212,7870.5111229,857
   Previous primary
    <350.000080,593,6840.000060,997,1310.00009,754,8200.00001,420,1500.00008,421,583
    35–490.003134,039,8190.000026,825,8030.00003,361,8440.0000430,3420.03213,421,830
    50–640.0811518,361,4150.0801214,805,4810.18631,594,8390.0000193,5410.00001,767,554
    65–790.4304510,850,9630.444398,978,3890.7625795,0070.000073,2550.09711,004,312
    ≥800.830222,692,8790.876202,285,0560.7141162,1790.000012,7870.5111229,857

AI/AN, American Indian/Alaska Native; A/PI, Asian or Pacific Islander.

Table 4

Case counts and incidence rates for penile squamous cell carcinoma by racial group and age group, SEER 18 (2000–2016)

TotalWhiteBlackAI/ANAPI
RateCountsPopulationRateCountsPopulationRateCountsPopulationRateCountsPopulationRateCountsPopulation
Total0.7534806709,211,3680.7724015542,920,3460.89950186,576,0180.6994111,168,310.36620168,546,689
   No primary0.5853816709,211,3680.5993171542,920,3460.66939386,576,0180.5923711,168,3160.29716768,546,689
   Previous primary0.168990709,211,3680.173844542,920,3460.22910886,576,0180.107411,168,310.0703468,546,689
Age group
   No primary
    <350.02486359,005,3970.02670266,408,6460.007350,048,3490.01416,795,7560.020835,752,747
    35–490.319496153,487,8040.326389117,719,3030.3987217,938,0750.08522,297,2000.1412215,533,227
    50–641.0031240121,928,3121.048103296,899,2601.11114012,657,7350.968141,472,8230.3824210,898,494
    65–792.414136457,542,2502.446113347,218,8362.7041304,846,3513.72718501,0201.327654,976,043
    ≥803.69163017,247,5063.75954714,674,3024.631481,085,5092.2002101,5172.185301,386,180
   Previous primary
    <350.0013359,005,3970.0013266,408,6460.000050,048,3490.00006,795,7560.000035,752,747
    35–490.02133153,487,8040.01721117,719,3030.0651217,938,0750.00002,297,2000.000015,533,227
    50–640.131163121,928,3120.13813896,899,2600.1461812,657,7350.00001,472,8230.064710,898,494
    65–790.86446757,542,2500.89740047,218,8361.073484,846,3510.5032501,0200.379174,976,043
    ≥801.88232417,247,5061.92428214,674,3022.769301,085,5091.8062101,5170.742101,386,180
Figure 1

Incidence rates trends of penile squamous cell carcinoma in men from 1975 to 2016.

AI/AN, American Indian/Alaska Native; A/PI, Asian or Pacific Islander. Incidence rates trends of penile squamous cell carcinoma in men from 1975 to 2016. The incidence trend of PSCC in the general population was similar with that in those without a previous malignancy. In white individuals, the IR was basically in a steady upward trend. However, in blacks and other individuals, the IRs experienced a large decline before 1985, and then gradually stabilized and increased slightly (). However, the IRs in all races have been increasing for patients with a previous malignancy (). Additionally, the IRs in black individuals were the highest while those in other races (AI/AN and A/PI) were the lowest no matter in which population.
Figure 2

Incidence rates trends of penile squamous cell carcinoma in men by race from 1975 to 2016.

Incidence rates trends of penile squamous cell carcinoma in men by race from 1975 to 2016. The IR trend in the general population was consistent with that in patients without a previous malignancy (). Among people with a previous primary cancer, the IR trends varied greatly, which may be explained by a small population base and a small number of cases. On the whole, the IRs were basically on the rise among people of all age groups. As for different age groups, the IRs of PSCC in the general population increased along with age. For those younger than 50 years old, the IRs were very low, especially in people younger than 35 years old (tended to be 0).
Figure 3

Incidence rates trends of penile squamous cell carcinoma in men by age from 1975 to 2016.

Incidence rates trends of penile squamous cell carcinoma in men by age from 1975 to 2016. From 1975 to 2016, the overall IRs of PSCC were on the rise in all populations (). For the general population, people without/with previous primary cancer, the APCs were 1.33, 0.69 and 4.32, respectively (all P<0.05).
Figure 4

Annual percentage change curves for different populations: the general population (A), people without a primary malignancy (B), people with a primary malignancy (C).

Annual percentage change curves for different populations: the general population (A), people without a primary malignancy (B), people with a primary malignancy (C). A total of 6,079 patients were selected for CSS analysis (43 patients were excluded because of unknown cause of death). Multivariate Cox analysis showed that age at diagnosis, pathological grade, extent of disease, marital status, the administration of surgery and presence of previous primary malignancy were independent prognostic factors for CSS ().
Table 5

Multivariate analysis adjusting for factors affecting the cancer-specific survival

VariableMultivariate analysis
HR95% CIP value
Primary cancer0.000
   No primaryRef
   Previous primary0.5180.428–0.6280.000
Age at diagnosis0.000
   <35Ref
   35–491.0590.661–1.6980.810
   50–641.1050.701–1.7420.668
   65–791.2600.800–1.9870.319
   ≥803.2531.282–3.2530.003
Race0.125
   WhiteRef
   Black1.0340.871–1.2280.701
   Other (AI/AN, A/PI)0.8270.625–1.0950.185
   Unknown0.1420.020–1.0170.052
Decade of diagnosis0.050
   1975–1984Ref
   1985–19940.9290.725–1.1900.560
   1995–20041.1320.878–1.4580.338
   2005–20161.2750.985–1.6500.065
Tumor site0.072
   PrepuceRef
   Glans penis1.0060.821–1.2340.951
   Body of penis1.1370.836–1.5440.413
   Overlapping lesion of penis1.4631.078–1.9860.015
   Penis, NOS1.0700.878–1.3050.501
Pathological grade0.000
   Grade IRef
   Grade II2.0151.704–2.3830.000
   Grade III2.3161.923–2.7880.000
   Grade IV4.1302.425–7.0340.000
   Unknown1.0630.855–1.3210.583
Extent of disease0.000
   LocalizedRef
   Regional2.5242.213–2.8790.000
   Distant10.9649.191–13.0800.000
   Unstaged2.2541.711–2.9700.000
Marital status0.001
   MarriedRef
   Previously married1.2161.055–1.4030.007
   Never married1.2961.110–1.5130.001
   Unknown0.9420.736–1.2070.637
Surgery0.000
   No/UnknownRef
   Yes0.5510.464–0.6550.000
Subsequently, KM curves were generated to learn the actual effect of different variables on CSS (). Older patients had worse prognosis than younger patients (P<0.001). Patients who underwent surgery had better prognosis than those who did not (P<0.001). Additionally, patients with distant diseases or higher-grade pathology had worse CSS. In our study, the prognosis of married men was relatively better than those who were never married. Interestingly, we found that patients with a previous malignancy had better CSS than those who did not. We believed that many patients would die from the previous cancer, but not PSCC. To verify our conjecture, we analyzed the survival impact of previous malignancies on PSCC patients. Results showed that a previous primary malignancy was tightly associated with worse OS in PSCC patients ().
Figure 5

Kaplan-Meier curves of cancer-specific survival stratified by age (A), extent of disease (B), pathological grade (C), marital status (D), use of surgery (E) and presence of a previous primary malignancy (F).

Figure 6

Kaplan-Meier curves of overall survival for stratification by presence of a previous primary malignancy.

Kaplan-Meier curves of cancer-specific survival stratified by age (A), extent of disease (B), pathological grade (C), marital status (D), use of surgery (E) and presence of a previous primary malignancy (F). Kaplan-Meier curves of overall survival for stratification by presence of a previous primary malignancy.

Discussion

This study provided a view of the epidemiological of PSCC in the USA from 1975 to 2016. IRs of PSCC in this study were similar with those in previously published studies. Research conducted by Barnholtz-Sloan et al. revealed that there were 5.8 new cases of penis cancer per million men per year on average between 1993 and 2002 in the USA (4). Lagacé et al. demonstrated that the IR of penile cancer in Canada was 6.077 per million men per year from 1992 to 2010 (16). This consistency indicated the geographic continuity of incidence trends, since these studies were all based on populations in North America. In our study, the overall IR of PSCC was basically similar to that in previous studies. An over-time increase in the overall IR of PSCC was identified from 1997 to 2016. Such a growing trend of IR may be attributed to an increasing rate of HPV infection which was widely recognized as a risk factor of PSCC development, as well as a lower rate of neonatal circumcision (17-20). Neonatal circumcision was negatively associated with the risk of PSCC, since it may reduce the risk of HIV and HPV infection and chronic inflammation by eliminating dirt (10). For those without a previous primary malignancy, the IR experienced a decline before 1987, while for those with a previous primary malignancy, the IR has been increasing since 1975. Therefore, difference in incidence may be attributed to the history of malignant tumors, which may transfer to the penis or make the body in a low immune status, thus promoting this upward trend. Moreover, we found that the IRs in black individuals were the highest, which may because of the early exposure to HPV through sexual contact (4,8,21). Furthermore, our results revealed that the IRs increased along with age, and in people younger than 50 years old, the IRs tended to be zero. Ertoy Baydar et al. reported that the average age of PSCC diagnosis was 66.5 years (51–83 years) in their study (22). This age stratification suggested that older patients, especially those older than 50, were at a higher risk of developing PSCC. In our study, age at diagnosis, pathological grade, extent of disease, marital status, the administration of surgery and presence of previous primary malignancy were identified to be independent prognostic factors for CSS in PSCC patients. Previous studies have reported that age, tumor stage, extent of disease and the administration of surgery were significantly associated with tumor prognosis in many cancer types (23,24). To our knowledge, those patients who were older, poorly differentiated, metastatic, and not surgically resected were bound to have a poor prognosis. Additionally, Ulff-Møller et al. found that unmarried men were at increased risk of developing invasive penile cancer compared to married men (25). In many Western countries, it has been increasingly common for couples to have unregistered partnerships like marriage. It may be biased to use marital status to evaluate prognosis, since marital status may not directly reflect the number of sexual partners. Furthermore, we found that patients with a history of previous malignancies tended to have a poor prognosis. Firstly, those with a prior primary cancer were more likely to be older, diagnosed in the last decade and had worse differentiation. Additionally, patients with previous malignancies were in worse physical condition and psychological health, which were tightly associated with worse prognosis. The main advantage of our study was the use of large population-based datasets. However, our research still had some limitations. First of all, numerous large-scale population-based studies have been shown to own inherent limitations, including the risk of data loss and patient classification errors. Sanders et al. (26) discussed these limitations in more detail in their article. In addition, selection bias may exist because of the retrospective nature. Moreover, there was a deficiency of available data on certain risk factors related to incidence and prognosis in SEER database, such as smoking history, HPV infection status and chemotherapy status, which may affect the comprehensiveness of the conclusions. Hence, further prospective and well-designed studies are needed to validate our results. In conclusion, our study provided a view of the epidemiological of PSCC in US from 1975 to 2016. The incidence of PSCC has been increasing in recent years. Moreover, several independent prognostic factors for CSS of PSCC patients were identified, allowing surgeons to assess the individualized risk in advance. The article’s supplementary files as
  26 in total

Review 1.  Human papillomavirus and urological tumours: I. Basic science and role in penile cancer.

Authors:  T R Griffiths; J K Mellon
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 2.  Chapter 2: The burden of HPV-related cancers.

Authors:  D Maxwell Parkin; Freddie Bray
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2006-08-31       Impact factor: 3.641

3.  Carcinoma of the penis in Uganda.

Authors:  R Owor
Journal:  IARC Sci Publ       Date:  1984

4.  Penile Invasive Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Analysis of Incidence, Mortality Trends, and Geographic Distribution in Canada.

Authors:  François Lagacé; Feras M Ghazawi; Michelle Le; Evgeny Savin; Andrei Zubarev; Mathieu Powell; Linda Moreau; Denis Sasseville; Ioana Popa; Ivan V Litvinov
Journal:  J Cutan Med Surg       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 2.092

Review 5.  Etiology of squamous cell carcinoma of the penis.

Authors:  J Dillner; G von Krogh; S Horenblas; C J Meijer
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl       Date:  2000

6.  National Trends and Predictors of Locally Advanced Penile Cancer in the United States (1998-2012).

Authors:  Juan Chipollini; Sharon Chaing; Charles C Peyton; Pranav Sharma; Laura C Kidd; Anna R Giuliano; Peter A Johnstone; Philippe E Spiess
Journal:  Clin Genitourin Cancer       Date:  2017-08-12       Impact factor: 2.872

7.  Burden of invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the penis in the United States, 1998-2003.

Authors:  Brenda Y Hernandez; Jill Barnholtz-Sloan; Robert R German; Anna Giuliano; Marc T Goodman; Jessica B King; Serban Negoita; Jose M Villalon-Gomez
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 8.  [Current state of chemotherapy in treatment of advanced penile cancer].

Authors:  A K Seitz; C Protzel; M Retz
Journal:  Aktuelle Urol       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 0.658

9.  A prognostic nomogram for overall survival in male breast cancer with histology of infiltrating duct carcinoma after surgery.

Authors:  Xin Chai; Mei-Yang Sun; Hong-Yao Jia; Min Wang; Ling Cao; Zhi-Wen Li; Dun-Wei Wang
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Competing-risks model for predicting the prognosis of penile cancer based on the SEER database.

Authors:  Jin Yang; Zhenyu Pan; Yujing He; Fanfan Zhao; Xiaojie Feng; Qingqing Liu; Jun Lyu
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2019-10-27       Impact factor: 4.452

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Emerging Therapies in Penile Cancer.

Authors:  Antonio Machado Alencar; Guru Sonpavde
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 5.738

2.  Trends in Incidence, Mortality, and Survival of Penile Cancer in the United States: A Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Xinxi Deng; Yang Liu; Xiangpeng Zhan; Tao Chen; Ming Jiang; Xinhao Jiang; Luyao Chen; Bin Fu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 5.738

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.