| Literature DB >> 33313133 |
Jinggang Xia1, Jia Zhang2, Jing Chang3, Yi Tian4, Jubo Li5, Baojie Zhang5, Xiangjun Zeng2, Chunlin Yin1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of glycaemic variability (GV) on intimal hyperplasia and plaque stability after coronary stenting via autophagy-mediated G3BP1/NLRP3 inflammasome signalling.Entities:
Keywords: G3BP1; Glycaemic variability (GV); NLRP3 inflammasome; autophagy; coronary heart disease (CHD); diabetes; intima; plaque stability
Year: 2020 PMID: 33313133 PMCID: PMC7723640 DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-4818
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Transl Med ISSN: 2305-5839
Figure 1Study protocol. RCA, right coronary artery; LAD, left anterior descending; %AS, percentage of area stenosis; NIT, neointimal thickness; LA, lumen area; NIA, neointimal area; OCT, optical coherence tomography.
Baseline characteristics/clinical factors before discharge and comparison of lipid, HbA1c, SD and RAMI during 2-year follow-up
| Variable | Low glycemic variability group (n=61) | High glycemic variability group (n=34) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | |||
| Sex, M/F | 40/21 | 24/10 | 0.79 |
| Age, years | 62±13 | 61±10 | 0.70 |
| History of hypertension | 20 | 13 | 0.76 |
| History of dyslipidemia | 22 | 15 | 0.58 |
| History of stroke | 10 | 9 | 0.36 |
| Current smoker | 35 | 18 | 0.84 |
| LVEDD, mm (before discharge) | 52±8 | 53±9 | 0.59 |
| LVEF, % (before discharge) | 53±9 | 51±10 | 0.33 |
| HbA1c, % | 6.6±1.1 | 6.7±1.2 | 0.69 |
| Serum creatinine, ìmol/L | 80.3±22.3 | 82.5±24.6 | 0.65 |
| Total cholesterol, mmol/L | 5.65±1.48 | 5.71±1.57 | 0.86 |
| LDL-C, mmol/L | 3.96±1.65 | 3.87±1.78 | 0.81 |
| HDL-C, mmol/L | 1.19±0.57 | 1.22 ± 0.81 | 0.85 |
| Peak troponin I, ng/mL | 36.9±16.2 | 38.5±17.8 | 0.66 |
| NT-pro BNP, ng/L | 1,132±435 | 1,086±568 | 0.68 |
| GRACE risk score before discharge | 121±27 | 126±31 | 0.43 |
| 2-year follow-up | |||
| Total cholesterol, mmol/L | 4.68±1.12 | 4.75±1.28 | 0.79 |
| LDL-C, mmol/L | 1.78±0.77 | 1.85±0.89 | 0.70 |
| HDL-C, mmol/L | 1.44±0.62 | 1.42±0.59 | 0.88 |
| HbA1c, % | 6.3±0.9 | 6.5±1.1 | 0.34 |
| Glycaemic variability (SD) | 1.69±0.28 | 2.45±0.39 | <0.01 |
| RAMI (%) | 1 (1.6) | 5 (14.7) | 0.038 |
Values are given as n (%) or mean ± SD. M, male; F, female; LVEDD, left ventricular end diastolic diameter; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; NT-pro BNP, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide; GRACE, Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events; SD, standard deviation; RAMI, recurrent acute myocardial infarction.
Comparison of body weight, blood samples and intimal hyperplasia assessed by OCT
| Parameter | At baseline | At 40 weeks | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sham group (n=3) | LGV group (n=5) | HGV group (n=5) | P | Sham group (n=3) | LGV group (n=5) | HGV group (n=5) | P | ||
| Body weight (kg) | 36.00±1.00 | 35.70±2.22 | 34.90±1.52 | 0.66 | 41.00±2.00 | 59.40±4.04* | 60.50±4.88* | <0.001 | |
| Fasting BG (mmol/L) | 4.37±0.88 | 4.28±0.57 | 3.78±0.76 | 0.45 | 4.38±0.45 | 10.19±1.20* | 10.01±1.84* | <0.001 | |
| Total cholesterol (mmol/L) | 1.94±0.08 | 2.14±0.36 | 2.29±0.25 | 0.27 | 2.47±0.04 | 4.96±1.15* | 5.11±1.97* | 0.06 | |
| LDL-C (mmol/L) | 0.77±0.46 | 0.87±0.11 | 0.99±0.22 | 0.36 | 1.48±1.15 | 4.39±1.02* | 4.55±1.55* | 0.02 | |
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | 1.66±0.02 | 1.62±0.10 | 1.60±0.18 | 0.78 | 1.15±0.07 | 1.04±0.61 | 1.10±0.38 | 0.94 | |
| Triglycerides(mmol/L) | 0.41±0.33 | 0.21±0.09 | 0.32±0.23 | 0.45 | 0.60±0.10 | 1.66±0.80* | 1.68±0.43* | 0.05 | |
| Mean of BG (mmol/L) | NA | NA | NA | NA | 6.10±0.26 | 12.80±1.68* | 13.06±1.03* | <0.001 | |
| SD of BG (mmol/L) | NA | NA | NA | NA | 1.37±0.15 | 2.46±0.21*# | 3.34±0.11*# | <0.001 | |
| OCT analysis | |||||||||
| Lumen area (mm2) | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 4.32±0.75 | 3.00±0.37# | <0.001 | |
| Stent area (mm2) | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 4.85±0.64 | 4.95±0.69 | 0.481 | |
| Neointimal area (mm2) | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0.53±0.19 | 1.95±0.85# | <0.001 | |
| Percent area stenosis (%) | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0.11±0.05 | 0.38±0.12# | <0.001 | |
| NIT (mm) | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0.15±0.04 | 0.35±0.05# | <0.001 | |
Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. *P<0.05, compared with sham group; #P<0.05, compared with LGV group. OCT, optical coherence tomography; LGV, low glycemic variability; HGV, high glycemic variability group; BG, blood glucose; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; SD, standard deviations; NIT, neointimal thickness.
Figure 2OCT images and histological findings of vessels stained with H&E and Movat staining in the LGV and HGV groups. OCT, optical coherence tomography; LGV, low glycaemic variability; HGV, high glycaemic variability.
Figure 3Western blot analysis of G3BP1, NLRP3, Becn1, LC3B and p62 in the Sham, LGV and HGV groups. LGV, low glycaemic variability; HGV, high glycaemic variability. Comparisons were made in three groups (n=3 in each). The results were reported as the mean ± SD. #P<0.05 vs. LGV group, *P<0.05 vs. sham group. Densities of bands were normalized to the β-actin.
Figure 4Western blot analysis of NLRP3 and G3BP1 in the control group, low glycaemic variability group, high glycaemic variability group, high glycaemic variability + rapamycin group and high glycaemic variability + 3-methyladenine group. Comparisons were made in five groups (n=3 in each). *P<0.05 vs. sham group, #P<0.05 vs. LGV group, &P<0.05 vs. HGV group. The results were presented as the mean ± SD. Densities of bands were normalized to the β-actin.