| Literature DB >> 33312538 |
Iraj Azizi1, Behrooz Esmaielpour1, Hamideh Fatemi1.
Abstract
Cadmium is a heavy metal that pollutes the environment and affects plants physiologically and morphologically. Selenium is considered as a beneficial element, with effective roles in increasing plant tolerance to environmental stresses. A greenhouse factorial pot experiment was conducted to study the impact of selenium on traits of Savory plants under Cd stress. Experimental factors included soil contamination with cadmium (0, 75, 100, and 150 μM) and foliar spraying of selenium (0, 10, 20, and 40 μM of Sodium Selenate). Biomass, photosynthetic pigments including chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophyll, proline, total soluble solids, cell membrane leakage, relative water content of leaves antioxidant enzymes, and Cd and Zn concentration in shoot and root were recorded. Results revealed that Cd stress decreased vegetative growth criteria, photosynthetic pigments include chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophyll, and carotenoid almost, 55%, 57%, 57%, and 68%, respectively, while poline, cell membrane leakage, peroxidase (POD), and catalase (CAT) antioxidant enzymes were increased with increasing Cd concentrations. Foliar spray of selenium reduced the toxic effects of Cd stress on savory plants via enhancing of proline content and stimulation of CAT and POD enzymes and limitation of cell membrane leakage. Also, selenium foliar spray improved chlorophyll content under Cd stress condition and decreased cadmium accumulation 29% in root, respectively. In general, these results suggest that foliar application of selenium could mitigate Cd toxicity and improve growth and antioxidant capacity of savory under different level of cadmium heavy metal stress.Entities:
Keywords: cadmium; heavy metals; savory; selenium
Year: 2020 PMID: 33312538 PMCID: PMC7723215 DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.1943
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Nutr ISSN: 2048-7177 Impact factor: 2.863
Figure 1Savory seedlings after foliar application
Comparison of the interactions between selenium soluble and cadmium stress on morphological indices of savory
| Treatment (µM) | Stem height (cm) | Root fresh weight (g) | Number of lateral branches | Number of leaves | Dry plant weight (g) | Root dry weight (g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cd 0 | ||||||
| Se 0 | 45.83bc | 2.21abc | 22.50bc | 146.67abcd | 4.90abcd | 0.65ab |
| Se 10 | 47.83abc | 2.52ab | 24.16ab | 163.33ab | 5.46ab | 0.82ab |
| Se 20 | 49.16ab | 2.53ab | 25.66ab | 172.33a | 6.02a | 0.90a |
| Se 40 | 50.66a | 2.76a | 27.33a | 173.33a | 6.02a | 0.90a |
| Cd 75 | ||||||
| Se 0 | 39.00efg | 1.70bcd | 21.66bcd | 131.67abcdef | 4.59abcde | 0.65ab |
| Se 10 | 39.83ef | 1.80bcd | 21.83bcd | 145.00abcde | 4.25bcdef | 0.66ab |
| Se 20 | 41.16de | 2.09abc | 22.33bcd | 146.67abcd | 5.37abc | 0.69ab |
| Se 40 | 44.50dc | 2.21abc | 22.33bcd | 161.33abc | 5.40abc | 0.76ab |
| Cd 100 | ||||||
| Se 0 | 37.00efg | 1.42dc | 20.50cde | 105.00def | 2.85f | 0.56bc |
| Se 10 | 37.66efg | 1.45dc | 21.00cd | 116.67bdef | 3.79cdef | 0.56bc |
| Se 20 | 38.33efg | 1.48dc | 22.16bcd | 116.67bdef | 4.13bcdef | 0.57bc |
| Se 40 | 39.16ef | 1.63bcd | 22.00bcd | 126.67abcdef | 4.28bcdef | 0.61abc |
| Cd 150 | ||||||
| Se 0 | 34.66e | 1.08d | 18.00e | 95.00f | 2.85f | 0.33c |
| Se 10 | 35.66fg | 1.34dc | 19.00e | 98.33ef | 3.14ef | 0.33c |
| Se 20 | 35.83fg | 1.42dc | 19.50de | 105.00def | 3.25ef | 0.54bc |
| Se 40 | 36.16fg | 1.42dc | 20.50cde | 115.00cdef | 3.58def | 0.55bc |
The alphabets in each column do not show statistically significant difference in the 5% probability level based on the LSD test.
Nonsimilar letters indicate a significant difference at 5% probability level.
Comparison of the interactions between selenium soluble and cadmium stress on Physiological indices of savory
| Treatment (µM) | Proline [µg(FW)−1] | Carbohydrate [µg(FW)−1] | Chlorophyll A [µg(FW)−1] | Chlorophyll b [µg(FW)−1] | Total chlorophyll [µg(FW)−1] | Carotenoid [µg(FW)−1] | Membrane cell leakage (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cd 0 | |||||||
| Se 0 | 0.41h | 0.29g | 6.45d | 2.42c | 9.18c | 1.69de | 13.30fgh |
| Se 10 | 0.46gh | 0.33fg | 7.19bc | 2.46c | 9.81b | 1.92bc | 12.61ghi |
| Se 20 | 0.52fgh | 0.37fg | 7.33b | 2.81ab | 10.15b | 2.19ab | 11.74ij |
| Se 40 | 0.6fg | 0.44fg | 8.18a | 3.04a | 11.23a | 2.38a | 10.97j |
| Cd 75 | |||||||
| Se 0 | 0.43h | 0.35fg | 5.6ef | 1.76efg | 7.33f | 1.29fg | 15.33de |
| Se 10 | 0.55fgh | 0.42fg | 6.16de | 1.83def | 8.14e | 1.47ef | 14.33ef |
| Se 20 | 0.66f | 0.5ef | 6.47d | 1.95de | 8.48de | 1.56e | 13.48fg |
| Se 40 | 0.87e | 0.65dce | 6.71cd | 2.01d | 8.87cd | 1.83cd | 11.92hij |
| Cd 100 | |||||||
| Se 0 | 0.82e | 0.47ef | 4.69gh | 1.47hij | 5.83hi | 0.84ij | 18.33b |
| Se 10 | 1.04d | 0.62ef | 4.89gh | 1.83def | 6.83fg | 0.94hij | 16.72cd |
| Se 20 | 1.28c | 0.8cd | 5.05fg | 1.59ghi | 6.84fg | 1.01h | 14.43ef |
| Se 40 | 1.31c | 1.03b | 5.49f | 1.67fgh | 7.27f | 1.15gh | 12.42ghij |
| Cd 150 | |||||||
| Se 0 | 1.02d | 0.64de | 2.87j | 1.04k | 3.91j | 0.54k | 20.65a |
| Se 10 | 1.23c | 0.83de | 3.89i | 1.33j | 5.29i | 0.71jk | 18.19b |
| Se 20 | 1.52b | 1.09b | 4i | 1.41ij | 5.83hi | 0.94hji | 16.19bc |
| Se 40 | 1.82a | 1.39a | 4.35hi | 1.47hij | 6.29gh | 1.08ghi | 15.08e |
The alphabets in each column do not show statistically significant difference in the 5% probability level based on the LSD test.
Nonsimilar letters indicate a significant difference at 5% probability level.
Comparison of the interactions between selenium soluble and cadmium stress on antioxidant enzymes of savory
| Treatment (µM) | POD enzyme [µg protein (min)−1] | CAT enzyme [µg protein (min)−1] |
|---|---|---|
| Cd 0 | ||
| Se 0 | 0.00106i | 0.000150g |
| Se 10 | 0.00126hi | 0.000163g |
| Se 20 | 0.00143gh | 0.000183fg |
| Se 40 | 0.00160efg | 0.000210ef |
| Cd 75 | ||
| Se 0 | 0.00126hi | 0.000180fg |
| Se 10 | 0.00146fgh | 0.000203f |
| Se 20 | 0.00170ef | 0.000243e |
| Se 40 | 0.00196cd | 0.000286d |
| Cd 100 | ||
| Se 0 | 0.00140gh | 0.000243e |
| Se 10 | 0.00173de | 0.000296d |
| Se 20 | 0.00206cd | 0.000343c |
| Se 40 | 0.00250b | 0.000393b |
| Cd 150 | ||
| Se 0 | 0.00173de | 0.000303d |
| Se 10 | 0.00203c | 0.000350c |
| Se 20 | 0.00243b | 0.000416b |
| Se 40 | 0.00283a | 0.000473a |
The alphabets in each column do not show statistically significant difference in the 5% probability level based on the LSD test.
Nonsimilar letters indicate a significant difference at 5% probability level.
Figure 2Effect of cd stress on leaf relative water content
Figure 3Effect of Se on leaf relative water content
Figure 4Effect of Se on Aerial Cd
Figure 5Effect of Cd stress on Aerial Cd
Comparison of the interactions between selenium soluble and cadmium stress on morphological indices of savory
| Treatment (µM) | Root cadmium (mg/L) | Leaf zinc (mg/L) |
|---|---|---|
| Cd 0 | ||
| Se 0 | 1.28efg | 1.30ab |
| Se 10 | 1.13gh | 1.30ab |
| Se 20 | 1.07h | 1.33ab |
| Se 40 | 1.07h | 1.42a |
| Cd 75 | ||
| Se 0 | 1.29efg | 1.33ab |
| Se 10 | 1.21efgh | 1.31ab |
| Se 20 | 1.51bcd | 1.21abc |
| Se 40 | 1.33def | 1.09bcd |
| Cd 100 | ||
| Se 0 | 1.54bc | 0.86defg |
| Se 10 | 1.51bcd | 0.96cdef |
| Se 20 | 1.36cde | 1.09bcd |
| Se 40 | 1.33def | 1.02bcde |
| Cd 150 | ||
| Se 0 | 1.92a | 0.14h |
| Se 10 | 1.68b | 0.51g |
| Se 20 | 1.39cde | 0.61fg |
| Se 40 | 1.36cde | 0.83efg |
The alphabets in each column do not show statistically significant difference in the 5% probability level based on the LSD test.
Nonsimilar letters indicate a significant difference at 5% probability level.
Figure 6Effect of Se on root zinc
Figure 7Effect of Cd on root zinc