| Literature DB >> 33312215 |
Mohammadsaeid Zahedi1, Qasem Asgari2, Fatemeh Badakhshan2, Amirhossein Sakhteman1, Sara Ranjbar3, Mehdi Khoshneviszadeh1,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND ANDEntities:
Keywords: 5-Oxo-hexahydroquinoline; Flow cytometry; Molecular docking; Propidium iodide; Toxoplasma
Year: 2020 PMID: 33312215 PMCID: PMC7714012 DOI: 10.4103/1735-5362.293515
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Res Pharm Sci ISSN: 1735-5362
Fig. 1Structural formula of 5-oxo-hexahydroquinoline compounds (pyridin-3-yl methyl 4-(4-bromophenyl)-2-methyl-5- oxo-1,4,5,6,7,8- hexahydroquinoline-3-carboxylate (Z1), pyridin-3-yl methyl 4-(3-hydroxyhenyl) -2- methyl- 5- oxo -1,4,5,6,7,8-hexahydroquinoline-3-carboxylate (Z2), 3-(pyridin-3-yl)propyl 4-(4-methoxyphenyl)-2-methyl-5-oxo-1,4,5,6,7,8-hexahydroquinoline-3-carboxylate (Z3), and pyridin- 2-ylmethyl 2-methyl -5-oxo-4-(3, 4,5-trimethoxyphenyl) -1,4,5,6,7,8-hexahydroquinoline-3-carboxylate (Z4).
Fig. 2Synthetic approaches of compounds Z1-Z4.
Structures and drug likeness scores of synthesized compounds.
| Code | R1 | R2 | Yield (%) | Log P | HBA | HBD | TPSA | nRB | MW |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Z1 | 3-methylpyridine | 43 | 2.048 | 5 | 1 | 67.76 | 6 | 453 | |
| Z2 | 3-methylpyridine | 24 | 1.214 | 6 | 2 | 87.99 | 5 | 390 | |
| Z3 | 2-methylpyridine | 68 | 2.173 | 8 | 1 | 95.45 | 8 | 464 | |
| Z4 | 3-propylpyridine | 48 | 2.051 | 6 | 1 | 64.98 | 6 | 432 | |
LogP, Logarithm of partition coefficient between n-octanol and water; HBA, number of hydrogen bond acceptors; HBD, number of hydrogen bond donors; TPSA, topological polar surface area; nRB, number of rotatable bonds; MW, molecular weight.
Fig. 3Flow cytometry analysis of Toxoplasma gondii tachyzoites exposed to different concentrations of Z1, Z2, Z3, Z4, negative and positive controls.
The mortality (%) of Toxoplasma gondii tachyzoites after 1.5 h exposure to different concentrations of 5-oxohexahydroquinoline derivatives. 0.2% of saponin was used as the positive control, in the meantime, DMSO (0.1% v/v) was considered as the negative control.
| Concentrations (μg/mL) | Compounds | Controls | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Z1 | Z2 | Z3 | Z4 | DMSO | Saponin | |
| 0 | 0.41 | 0.41 | 0.41 | 0.41 | - | - |
| 1 | 20.06 | 20.30 | 77.94 | 76.68 | - | - |
| 2 | 21.48 | 21.49 | 73.03 | 75.59 | - | - |
| 4 | 13.27 | 14.22 | 72.14 | 85.47 | - | - |
| 8 | 26.46 | 24.51 | 63.70 | 85.77 | - | - |
| 16 | 33.52 | 26.92 | 64.94 | 83.93 | - | - |
| 32 | 38.86 | 38.20 | 74.56 | 90.28 | - | - |
| 64 | 35.21 | 42.43 | 78.03 | 90.57 | - | - |
| - | - | - | - | 16.32 | 96.69 | |
Fig. 4The mean of longevity (days) of mice groups inoculated by Toxoplasma gondii tachyzoites exposed to three different concentrations of compounds Z3 and Z4 (μg/mL). *P ≤ 0.05 indicates significant differences compared to the negative control group (DMSO). The mice treated with sulfadiazine as positive control but due to a longevity more than 30 days, therefore the positive control is not shown on the graph. Data represent mean ± SD, n = 5.
Docking results of 5-oxo-hexahydroquinoline derivatives into the Toxoplasma gondii Enoyl- acyl carrier protein Reductase enzyme binding site.
| Ligands | ΔG (Kcal/mol) | Interaction | Atom of ligand | Aminoacid |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| -8.4 | H-bonding | Oxygen (carbonyl) | Gly131 | |
| -7.8 | H-bonding | Oxygen (carbonyl) | Gly131 | |
| -8.5 | H-bonding | NH | Ala129 | |
| H-bonding | Oxygen (methoxy) | Lys237 | ||
| -9.2 | H-bonding | NH | Ala129 | |
| H-bonding | Nitrogen (pyridine ring) | Arg230 | ||
| H-bonding | Oxygen (carbonyl) | Ala231 | ||
| Triclosan | -9.1 | H-bonding | OH | Tyr189 |
Fig. 5Representation of the co-crystallized inhibitor (blue) docked into the binding site and superimposed on co-crystallized inhibitor (red) in the crystal structure of T. gondii Enoyl-ACP Reductase (PDB ID: 2O2S).
Fig. 6Docking model of compound Z4 in the Toxoplasma gondii enoyl-acyl carrier protein Reductase enzyme active site (PDB ID: 2O2S).