| Literature DB >> 33311982 |
Chung-Chih Liao1, Cheng-Li Lin2,3, Ke-Ru Liao4, Jung-Miao Li1,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Existing evidence has shown that patients with trigeminal neuralgia (TN) have a higher risk of developing depression than the normal population. Clinically, acupuncture has been widely used to alleviate pain in TN. However, few studies have explored the use of acupuncture to prevent depression in TN. Therefore, this study aimed to apply national real-world data to investigate the long-term effect of acupuncture on the risk of depression in patients with TN.Entities:
Keywords: National Health Insurance Research Database; acupuncture; depression; real-world data; trigeminal neuralgia
Year: 2020 PMID: 33311982 PMCID: PMC7725145 DOI: 10.2147/NDT.S284857
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat ISSN: 1176-6328 Impact factor: 2.570
Figure 1Flowchart summarizing the study subject enrolment procedure. LHID 2000: Longitudinal Health Insurance Database 2000.
Characteristics of Trigeminal Neuralgia Patients According to the Reception of Acupuncture
| Variable | Received Acupuncture | p value* | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No (n=776) | Yes (n =776) | ||||
| n | % | n | % | ||
| 0.72 | |||||
| Female | 475 | 61.2 | 468 | 60.3 | |
| Male | 301 | 38.8 | 308 | 39.7 | |
| 0.17 | |||||
| 18–29 | 51 | 6.57 | 52 | 6.70 | |
| 30–39 | 104 | 13.4 | 90 | 11.6 | |
| 40–49 | 179 | 23.1 | 176 | 22.7 | |
| 50–59 | 162 | 20.9 | 187 | 24.1 | |
| 60–69 | 132 | 17.0 | 153 | 19.7 | |
| ≥70 | 148 | 19.1 | 118 | 15.2 | |
| Mean ± SD (years)† | 54.0(15.9) | 53.6(14.7) | 0.69 | ||
| 0.83 | |||||
| < 15,000 NTD (<500 USD) | 226 | 29.1 | 222 | 28.6 | |
| 15,000−19,999 NTD (500–666.6 USD) | 229 | 29.5 | 240 | 30.9 | |
| ≥ 20,000 NTD (≥ 666.66 USD) | 321 | 41.4 | 314 | 40.5 | |
| 0.96 | |||||
| 1 (highest) | 255 | 32.9 | 255 | 32.9 | |
| 2 | 216 | 27.8 | 208 | 26.8 | |
| 3 | 112 | 14.4 | 118 | 15.2 | |
| 4 (lowest) | 193 | 24.9 | 195 | 25.1 | |
| Office worker | 381 | 49.1 | 408 | 52.6 | |
| Laborer | 328 | 42.3 | 293 | 37.8 | |
| Other | 67 | 8.63 | 75 | 9.66 | |
| Diabetes mellitus | 86 | 11.1 | 90 | 11.6 | 0.75 |
| Hypertension | 365 | 47.0 | 370 | 47.7 | 0.80 |
| Hyperlipidemia | 312 | 40.2 | 309 | 39.8 | 0.88 |
| Stroke | 46 | 5.93 | 44 | 5.67 | 0.83 |
| Coronary artery disease | 215 | 27.7 | 217 | 28.0 | 0.91 |
| Mental disorders | 117 | 15.1 | 118 | 15.2 | 0.94 |
| Traumatic brain injury | 141 | 18.2 | 137 | 17.7 | 0.79 |
| Parkinson’s disease | 14 | 1.80 | 14 | 1.80 | 0.99 |
| Cirrhosis | 283 | 36.5 | 277 | 35.7 | 0.75 |
| COPD | 176 | 22.7 | 180 | 23.2 | 0.81 |
| Renal disease | 39 | 5.03 | 37 | 4.77 | 0.81 |
| Carbamazepine | 415 | 53.5 | 448 | 57.7 | 0.09 |
| Acetaminophen | 776 | 100.0 | 776 | 100.0 | – |
| NSAIDs | 776 | 100.0 | 776 | 100.0 | – |
| Morphine | 138 | 17.8 | 110 | 14.2 | 0.05 |
| Tramadol | 223 | 28.7 | 242 | 31.2 | 0.29 |
| 453 | 58.4 | 756 | 97.4 | <0.001 | |
| 0.01 | |||||
| 2000 | 89 | 11.5 | 84 | 10.8 | |
| 2001 | 70 | 9.02 | 90 | 11.6 | |
| 2002 | 70 | 9.02 | 65 | 8.38 | |
| 2003 | 66 | 8.51 | 58 | 7.47 | |
| 2004 | 57 | 7.35 | 68 | 8.76 | |
| 2005 | 49 | 6.31 | 82 | 10.6 | |
| 2006 | 67 | 8.63 | 78 | 10.1 | |
| 2007 | 71 | 9.15 | 74 | 9.54 | |
| 2008 | 78 | 10.1 | 64 | 8.25 | |
| 2009 | 70 | 9.02 | 57 | 7.35 | |
| 2010 | 89 | 11.5 | 56 | 7.22 | |
| (1211, 944) | (941, 617) | ||||
| (30.3, 24) | (37.4, 30.4) | ||||
| (12.1, 4) | |||||
Notes: The mean (median) of the follow-up period for depression was 5.47 (3.52) and 3.50 (3.00) years for the acupuncture cohort and non-acupuncture cohort, respectively; *Chi-square test; †t-test; ⁂NTD, New Taiwan Dollar; 1 NTD is equal to 0.03 USD; &The urbanization level was divided by the population density of the residential area into four levels; level 1 was the most urbanized and level 4 was the least urbanized; Other occupation categories included those who were primarily retired, unemployed, and low-income populations.
Hazard Ratios of Depression with Covariates Among Patients with Trigeminal Neuralgia in Multivariable Cox Proportional Hazards Regression
| Variable | Depression | |
|---|---|---|
| Crude HR† (95% CI) | Adjusted HR ‡ (95% CI) | |
| 0.48(0.35, 0.66) | 0.47(0.31, 0.70)*** | |
| 0.75(0.54, 1.03) | 0.82(0.56, 1.20) | |
| 18–29 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| 30–39 | 1.45(0.67, 3.12) | 0.68(0.29, 1.58) |
| 40–49 | 1.12(0.54, 2.33) | 0.86(0.38, 1.94) |
| 50–59 | 1.16(0.56, 2.41) | 0.79(0.34, 1.86) |
| 60–69 | 1.37(0.66, 2.87) | 0.86(0.35, 2.12) |
| ≥70 | 1.79(0.86, 3.70) | 0.84(0.35, 2.01) |
| < 15,000 NTD (<500 USD) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| 15,000−19,999 NTD (500–666.6 USD) | 1.00(0.68, 1.45) | 2.12(1.22, 3.68)** |
| ≥ 20,000 NTD (≥ 666.66 USD) | 0.85(0.59, 1.21) | 1.74(1.02, 2.97)* |
| 1 (highest) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| 2 | 0.80(0.55, 1.17) | 0.70(0.46, 1.07) |
| 3 | 0.71(0.44, 1.14) | 0.69(0.41, 1.18) |
| 4 (lowest) | 0.82(0.55, 1.21) | 0.80(0.51, 1.23) |
| Office worker | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Laborer | 1.45(1.05, 2.02) | 0.75(0.50, 1.13) |
| Other | 2.61(1.69, 4.01)*** | 2.37(1.30, 4.32)** |
| Diabetes mellitus | 1.62(1.08, 2.43)* | 1.32(0.80, 2.18) |
| Hypertension | 1.22(0.91, 1.64) | 0.75(0.47, 1.18) |
| Hyperlipidemia | 1.18(0.88, 1.60) | 0.92(0.63, 1.34) |
| Stroke | 1.42(0.79, 2.55) | 0.89(0.45, 1.76) |
| Coronary artery disease | 1.44(1.05, 1.96)* | 0.89(0.60, 1.32) |
| Mental disorders | 40.7(27.0, 61.5)*** | 57.9(37.1, 90.5)*** |
| Traumatic brain injury | 1.03(0.70, 1.53) | 0.90(0.57, 1.40) |
| Parkinson’s disease | 1.50(0.56, 4.04) | 0.71(0.24, 2.16) |
| Cirrhosis | 1.22(0.90, 1.66) | 1.09(0.77, 1.57) |
| COPD | 1.24(0.88, 1.74) | 0.78(0.52, 1.18) |
| Renal disease | 1.14(0.58, 2.23) | 1.11(0.53, 2.36) |
| Carbamazepine | 1.62(1.18, 2.22)** | 0.85(0.59, 1.21) |
| Acetaminophen | ||
| NSAIDs | ||
| Morphine | 0.89(0.58, 1.39) | 1.05(0.65, 1.70) |
| Tramadol | 0.49(0.33, 0.72)*** | 0.35(0.23, 0.55)*** |
| 0.37(0.27, 0.50)*** | 0.59(0.39, 0.90)* | |
Notes: †Crude HR, relative hazard ratio; ‡Adjusted HR, adjusted for receiving acupuncture, sex, age, monthly income, urbanization level, occupation category, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, stroke, coronary artery disease, mental disorders, traumatic brain injury, Parkinson’s disease, cirrhosis, COPD, renal disease, conventional medicine of carbamazepine, morphine, and tramadol, and Chinese herbal medicine in Cox proportional hazards regression; ⁂NTD, New Taiwan Dollar; 1 NTD is equal to 0.03 USD; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.
Abbreviations: HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Incidence Rates and Hazard Ratio of Depression for Trigeminal Neuralgia Patients Who Did and Did Not Receive Acupuncture Treatment
| Variables | Received Acupuncture | Compared with Non-Acupuncture Users | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No | Yes | Crude HR | Adjusted HR† | |||||
| (n=776) | (n=776) | |||||||
| Event | Person Years | IR | Event | Person Years | IR | (95% CI) | (95% CI) | |
| 104 | 2716 | 38.3 | 69 | 4245 | 16.3 | 0.48(0.35, 0.66)*** | 0.47(0.31, 0.70)*** | |
| Female | 67 | 1706 | 39.3 | 51 | 2620 | 19.5 | 0.57(0.39, 0.82)** | 0.54(0.32, 0.92)* |
| Male | 37 | 1010 | 36.6 | 18 | 1625 | 11.1 | 0.34(0.19, 0.60)*** | 0.43(0.19, 0.98)* |
| 18–29 | 9 | 173 | 52.1 | 0 | 320 | 0.00 | ||
| 30–39 | 18 | 391 | 46.0 | 6 | 482 | 12.5 | 0.30(0.12, 0.77)* | 0.80(0.20, 3.28) |
| 40–49 | 20 | 682 | 29.3 | 15 | 970 | 15.5 | 0.59(0.30, 1.17) | 0.80(0.22, 2.90) |
| 50–59 | 19 | 583 | 32.6 | 16 | 1039 | 15.4 | 0.54(0.28, 1.06) | 0.21(0.07, 0.60)** |
| 60–69 | 20 | 423 | 47.2 | 13 | 849 | 15.3 | 0.36(0.18, 0.74)** | 0.19(0.06, 0.64)** |
| ≥70 | 18 | 463 | 38.9 | 19 | 585 | 32.5 | 0.88(0.46, 1.71) | 0.38(0.13, 1.10) |
| < 15,000 NTD (<500 USD) | 26 | 849 | 30.6 | 28 | 1205 | 23.2 | 0.81(0.47, 1.40) | 0.28(0.13, 0.63)** |
| 15,000−19,999 NTD (500–666.6 USD) | 33 | 763 | 43.2 | 22 | 1304 | 16.9 | 0.46(0.26, 0.79)** | 0.56(0.27, 1.17) |
| ≥ 20,000 NTD (≥ 666.66 USD) | 45 | 1104 | 40.8 | 19 | 1736 | 10.9 | 0.31(0.18, 0.53)*** | 0.51(0.24, 1.09) |
| 1 (highest) | 35 | 863 | 40.6 | 30 | 1332 | 22.5 | 0.65(0.40, 1.06) | 0.69(0.34, 1.39) |
| 2 | 29 | 748 | 38.8 | 15 | 1140 | 13.2 | 0.39(0.21, 0.74) | 0.46(0.19, 1.11) |
| 3 | 14 | 433 | 32.3 | 9 | 727 | 12.4 | 0.43(0.19, 1.01) | 0.21(0.05, 0.85)* |
| 4 (lowest) | 26 | 673 | 38.7 | 15 | 1046 | 14.3 | 0.41(0.21, 0.77)** | 0.30(0.11, 0.78)* |
| Office worker | 38 | 1383 | 27.5 | 30 | 2242 | 13.4 | 0.56(0.34, 0.90)* | 0.53(0.28, 1.01) |
| Laborer | 51 | 1137 | 44.8 | 24 | 1585 | 15.1 | 0.39(0.24, 0.63)*** | 0.56(0.29, 1.08) |
| Other | 15 | 195 | 76.8 | 15 | 418 | 35.9 | 0.54(0.26, 1.12) | 0.06(0.01, 0.29)*** |
| Diabetes mellitus | ||||||||
| No | 91 | 2465 | 36.9 | 54 | 3785 | 14.3 | 0.44(0.31, 0.61)*** | 0.48(0.31, 0.73)*** |
| Yes | 13 | 251 | 51.8 | 15 | 460 | 32.6 | 0.72(0.34, 1.56) | 0.61(0.14, 2.69) |
| Hypertension | ||||||||
| No | 55 | 1529 | 36.0 | 30 | 2310 | 13.0 | 0.40(0.26, 0.63)*** | 0.42(0.24, 0.75)** |
| Yes | 49 | 1187 | 41.3 | 39 | 1935 | 20.2 | 0.56(0.37, 0.86)** | 0.63(0.35, 1.13) |
| Hyperlipidemia | ||||||||
| No | 64 | 1723 | 37.2 | 36 | 2651 | 13.6 | 0.42(0.28, 0.63)*** | 0.46(0.27, 0.76)** |
| Yes | 40 | 993 | 40.3 | 33 | 1594 | 20.7 | 0.58(0.36, 0.93)* | 0.74(0.37, 1.47) |
| Stroke | ||||||||
| No | 99 | 2590 | 38.2 | 62 | 4049 | 15.3 | 0.46(0.33, 0.63)*** | 0.56(0.37, 0.83)** |
| Yes | 5 | 126 | 39.7 | 7 | 196 | 35.7 | 0.86(0.25, 2.92) | 0.49(0.00, 78.5) |
| Coronary artery disease | ||||||||
| No | 74 | 1976 | 37.4 | 38 | 3106 | 12.2 | 0.37(0.25, 0.55)*** | 0.44(0.27, 0.72)** |
| Yes | 30 | 740 | 40.6 | 31 | 1139 | 27.2 | 0.74(0.45, 1.23) | 0.88(0.42, 1.84) |
| Mental disorders | ||||||||
| No | 20 | 2466 | 8.11 | 7 | 3743 | 1.87 | 0.23(0.10, 0.56)** | 0.28(0.10, 0.74)* |
| Yes | 84 | 250 | 335.8 | 62 | 502 | 123.4 | 0.42(0.30, 0.58)*** | 0.62(0.40, 0.95)* |
| Traumatic brain injury | ||||||||
| No | 87 | 2251 | 38.6 | 56 | 3581 | 15.6 | 0.47(0.33, 0.66)*** | 0.56(0.36, 0.87)** |
| Yes | 17 | 465 | 36.6 | 13 | 664 | 19.6 | 0.53(0.25, 1.11) | 0.72(0.24, 2.19) |
| Parkinson’s disease | ||||||||
| No | 101 | 2683 | 37.7 | 68 | 4175 | 16.3 | 0.49(0.36, 0.67)*** | 0.53(0.36, 0.79)** |
| Yes | 3 | 33 | 89.6 | 1 | 70 | 14.3 | 0.21(0.02, 2.11) | - |
| Cirrhosis | ||||||||
| No | 65 | 1785 | 36.4 | 39 | 2754 | 14.2 | 0.44(0.30, 0.66)*** | 0.48(0.28, 0.83)** |
| Yes | 39 | 931 | 41.9 | 30 | 1491 | 20.1 | 0.54(0.33, 0.87)* | 0.54(0.29, 0.99)* |
| COPD | ||||||||
| No | 79 | 2154 | 36.7 | 49 | 3286 | 14.9 | 0.47(0.33,0 0.67)*** | 0.55(0.35, 0.87)* |
| Yes | 25 | 562 | 44.5 | 20 | 959 | 20.9 | 0.50(0.27, 0.91)* | 0.38(0.17, 0.84)* |
| Renal disease | ||||||||
| No | 101 | 2601 | 38.8 | 63 | 4061 | 15.5 | 0.46(0.33, 0.63)*** | 0.53(0.36, 0.79)** |
| Yes | 3 | 115 | 26.1 | 6 | 184 | 32.7 | 0.98(0.22, 4.34) | - |
| Carbamazepine | ||||||||
| No | 33 | 1242 | 26.6 | 23 | 1773 | 13.0 | 0.59(0.34, 1.01) | 0.74(0.34,1 0.61) |
| Yes | 71 | 1474 | 48.2 | 46 | 2472 | 18.6 | 0.42(0.29,0 0.61)*** | 0.47(0.30,0 0.75)** |
| Morphine | ||||||||
| No | 93 | 2288 | 40.6 | 57 | 3702 | 15.4 | 0.43(0.31,0 0.61)*** | 0.49(0.32, 0.75)*** |
| Yes | 11 | 428 | 25.7 | 12 | 543 | 22.1 | 0.91(0.40, 2.08) | 3.32(0.49, 22.5) |
| Tramadol | ||||||||
| No | 90 | 1961 | 45.9 | 53 | 2930 | 18.1 | 0.47(0.33, 0.66)*** | 0.56(0.36, 0.85)** |
| Yes | 14 | 755 | 18.5 | 16 | 1315 | 12.2 | 0.57(0.27, 1.21) | 0.48(0.16, 1.39) |
| No | 60 | 969 | 61.9 | 2 | 100 | 19.9 | 0.43(0.10, 1.76) | 0.28(0.05, 1.69) |
| Yes | 44 | 1747 | 25.2 | 67 | 4145 | 16.2 | 0.68(0.46, 1.00) | 0.52(0.34, 0.78)** |
Notes: †Adjusted HR, adjusted for receiving acupuncture, sex, age, monthly income, urbanization level, occupation category, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, stroke, coronary artery disease, mental disorders, traumatic brain injury, Parkinson’s disease, cirrhosis, COPD, renal disease, conventional medicine of carbamazepine, morphine, and tramadol, and Chinese herbal medicine in Cox proportional hazards regression; ⁂NTD, New Taiwan Dollar; 1 NTD is equal to 0.03 USD; &The urbanization level was divided by the population density of the residential area into four levels; level 1 was the most urbanized and level 4 was the least urbanized; ‡Other occupation categories included those who were primarily retired, unemployed, and low-income populations; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.
Abbreviations: IR, incidence rates, per 1,000 person-years; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Joint Effects of Carbamazepine and Acupuncture on the Risk of Depression in Patients with Trigeminal Neuralgia
| Variables | N | Event | Crude HR | Adjusted HR | p-value# | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Received acupuncture | Carbamazepine | 0.43 | ||||
| No | No | 361 | 33 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| No | Yes | 415 | 71 | 1.85(1.23, 2.80)** | 0.93(0.59, 1.48) | |
| Yes | No | 328 | 23 | 0.56(0.33, 0.96)* | 0.55(0.30, 1.00) | |
| Yes | Yes | 448 | 46 | 0.80(0.51, 1.26) | 0.40(0.23, 0.71)** | |
Notes: Adjusted HR, adjusted for age, sex, monthly income, urbanization level, occupation category, baseline comorbidities, conventional medicine of carbamazepine, morphine, tramadol, and Chinese herbal medicine; #p-value for interaction; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.
Abbreviations: HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Figure 2Cumulative incidence of depression between the acupuncture cohort and the non-acupuncture cohort.