Literature DB >> 33311980

Body Dysmorphic Disorder, Psychiatric Symptoms, and Quality of Life in Female Dermatological Patients.

Ik-Seung Chee1,2, Hyun-Jin Kim2, Young Lee3, Jee Wook Kim4,5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine the relationships of body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) with psychiatric symptoms and quality of life in dermatological patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 154 female patients with dermatological disease underwent a comprehensive clinical assessment that included the Body Dysmorphic Disorder Examination-Self Report (BDDE-SR), Symptom Checklist 90-Revised (SCL-90-R), and Skindex-29. Dermatological disease was categorized as follows: inflammatory dermatoses (reference category), isolated lesions, and unclassified dermatoses. The BDDE-SR and SCL-90-R scores were used to evaluate BDD and psychiatric symptoms, respectively. Dermatological quality of life was measured with the Skindex-29.
RESULTS: The BDDE-SR score was significantly associated with the SCL-90-R and Skindex-29 total and subscores, even after controlling for age, body mass index, and dermatological diagnosis. The variables that contributed most to the BDDE-SR score were the SCL-90-R depression score and Skindex-29 emotion scores. Additional analyses revealed that the BDDE-SR score was higher in participants with unclassified dermatoses, but neither the SCL-90-R score nor Skindex-29 score was related to any dermatological diagnosis.
CONCLUSION: The BDD symptoms were especially prominent in the unclassified dermatoses group and were highly related to psychiatric symptoms and a poor quality of life in our dermatological patients. Further research including studies involving psychiatric interviews to confirm the BDD diagnosis and symptoms will improve our understanding of BDD in dermatological patients.
© 2020 Chee et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  body dysmorphic disorder; psychiatric symptoms; quality of life: dermatological disease; unclassified dermatoses

Year:  2020        PMID: 33311980      PMCID: PMC7725143          DOI: 10.2147/NDT.S284077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat        ISSN: 1176-6328            Impact factor:   2.570


Introduction

Body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) is a mental disorder characterized by an obsession with some aspect of one’s own body or appearance perceived to be severely flawed, and therefore warranting exceptional measures to hide or fix.1 The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) defines BDD as a preoccupation with an imagined or trivial defect in appearance causing social or occupational dysfunction, and not better explained as another disorder.2 The DSM-5 includes BDD in a new category (obsessive-compulsive spectrum) and adds operational criteria (such as repetitive behaviors or intrusive thoughts) and a new subtype of dysmorphia (muscle dysmorphia; belief that one’s body is too small, or insufficiently muscular or lean).3 Most BDD patients seen in psychiatric settings have other mental disorders. Several studies have reported that major depressive disorder is the most common comorbid disorder, with the largest study reporting a current and lifetime rates of 58% and 76%, respectively.4,5 Obsessive-compulsive disorder, substance use disorder, social phobia, and avoidant personality disorder also commonly co-occur with BDD.4,5 BDD patients experience unusually high levels of perceived stress and a poor quality of life.5–7 Health-related quality of life is a multi-dimensional construct reflecting overall wellbeing that includes aspects of physical and mental health and is self-defined according to the perceived ability to achieve and maintain a level of overall functioning that allows the patient to reach life goals.8,9 In a study assessing health-related quality of life using the Short Form Health Survey, outpatients with BDD had worse scores in all mental health domains than the general population and patients with depression.7 More severe BDD symptoms were associated with poorer mental health-related quality of life.5 Empirical studies suggest that the prevalence of BDD among dermatology and plastic surgery patients is higher than in the general population.10,11 In total, 12% of dermatology patients screened positive for BDD,10 compared to 7–8% of cosmetic surgery and in cosmetic surgery patients.11 According to Phillips et al,10 dermatologists may be the physicians most often seen by these patients. BDD seems to be more prevalent among dermatology and cosmetic surgery patients, thus showing the importance of professionals with knowledge of the clinical aspects of BDD. We first aimed to examine the relationships of BDD with psychiatric symptoms and quality of life in dermatological patients. We secondly assessed the relationship between stratified dermatologic diagnosis and BDD, psychiatric symptoms, or quality of life.

Patients and Methods

Participants

A total of 154 female outpatients with a dermatological disease who visited to the dermatology outpatient clinic of a university hospital were enrolled in this study. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Republic of Korea. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All participants provided written informed consent.

Dermatological Diagnoses

All participants were diagnosed with a dermatological disease based on a clinical examination by a dermatologist. The dermatological disease categories were inflammatory dermatoses (reference category), isolated lesions, and unclassified dermatoses, as per previous studies.12–14

Assessments of BDD, Psychiatric Symptoms, and Quality of Life

All participants with dermatological disease underwent a comprehensive clinical assessment that included the Body Dysmorphic Disorder Examination-Self Report (BDDE-SR), Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R), and Skindex-29; these instruments were used to evaluate BDD, psychiatric symptoms, and quality of life, respectively.

BDDE-SR

The BDDE-SR is a 30-item self-report questionnaire that determines the extent of dissatisfaction with body parts within the past month.15,16 Each question (except for questions 16a and b, which are answered “yes” or “no”) is answered on a 6-point Likert scale. The total score ranges from 0 to 168. Higher scores reflect more severe symptoms. The Korean version of the BDDE-SR has been tested in adolescents,17 and college students.18

SCL-90-R

The SCL-90-R is a self-report instrument comprising 90 items that psychological distress and current psychiatric symptoms (somatization, obsessive-compulsive disorder, interpersonal sensitivity, depression, anxiety, hostility, phobic anxiety, paranoid ideation, and psychoticism).19 Respondents provide answers based on the symptoms in the past week, including the day of the test, using a 5-point Likert scale. Higher scores mean higher level of symptoms. The Korean version of the SCL-90-R has been tested for reliability and validity.20

Skindex-29

The Skindex-2921 is a 29-item self-administered questionnaire that assesses the health-related quality of life of patients with skin diseases. It covers three domains: degree of symptoms, psychosocial functioning, and emotional status.22 The questions are answered using a 5-point Likert scale, and mean scores for all items and individual domains are calculated (total and domain score, respectively), and higher scores mean higher level of symptoms. The Korean version of the Skindex-29 has been tested for reliability and validity.23

BMI Assessment

Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the height in meters squared. Research nurses measured the height and body weight of all participants and calculated the BMI. BMI was categorized underweight (<21 mg/kg2), healthy weight (21–25 mg/kg2) or overweight (>25 mg/kg2) in accordance with a previous report.24

Statistical Analysis

Demographic and clinical variables were compared among groups using analysis of variance for continuous variables and the χ2 test for categorical variables. To examine the relationship of BDD with psychiatric symptoms or quality of life, multiple linear regression analysis with BDDE-SR score as the independent variable and SCL-90-R and Skindex-29 scores as the dependent variables were performed, including an analysis stratified according to dermatological diagnosis using inflammatory dermatoses as the reference (inflammatory dermatoses vs isolated lesions and inflammatory dermatoses vs unclassified dermatoses). Three models were devised: the first included no covariates, the second included age as a covariate, and the third included age, BMI, and the dermatological diagnosis as covariates. Furthermore, to identify variables contributing to BDD, stepwise multiple linear regression analyses with the SCL-90-R and Skindex-29 subscores as independent variables and the BDDE-SR score as the dependent variable was conducted. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics software (ver. 24.0; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). A p-value <0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Participant Characteristics

The demographic and clinical characteristics of the participants are presented in Table 1. Among the total 154 female participants with a dermatological diagnosis, 96 had inflammatory dermatoses [acne, n = 38; atopic (eczematous) dermatitis, n = 22; allergic contact dermatitis, n = 12; urticaria, n = 6; seborrheic dermatitis, n = 5; psoriasis, n = 5; xeroderma, n = 2; Behçet’s disease, n = 1; ringworm, n = 1; herpes zoster, n =1; candidiasis, n = 1; folliculitis, n = 1; mycosis fungoides, n = 1]; 28 had isolated lesions (melasma, n = 11; freckles, n = 5; warts, n = 3; blemishes, n = 3; solar lentigo, n = 2; syringoma, n = 1; dermatofibroma, n = 2; or spots, n =1), and 30 had unclassified dermatoses (alopecia, n = 23; vitiligo, n = 3; facial flushing, n =2; telogen effluvium, n = 1; trichotillomania, n = 1) (Table 1).
Table 1

Participant Characteristics by Stratified Dermatological Diagnoses (N = 154)

CharacteristicsOverallInflammatory DermatosesIsolated LesionsUnclassified Dermatosesχ2 or FP
n, %15496 (62.3)28 (18.2)30 (19.5)
Age, y34.85 (9.2)32.35 (8.0)40.75 (8.5)37.33 (10.4)11.945<0.001
BMI, kg/m221.55 (2.6)21.09 (2.5)22.15 (2.6)22.48 (2.6)4.0970.019
BDD global score69.27 (23.9)67.57 (23.3)66.54 (20.6)77.23 (27.2)2.1300.122
SCL-90-R
 Total score437.61 (107.8)433.76 (93.6)430.64 (143.6)456.43 (115.2)0.5740.565
 Somatization score43.06 (7.8)43.15 (7.7)42.04 (8.8)43.77 (7.3)0.3660.694
 Obsessive-compulsive score43.41 (9.2)43.49 (8.3)41.46 (11.1)44.97 (9.8)1.0670.347
 Interpersonal sensitivity score44.13 (9.9)43.59 (9.0)43.32 (11.4)46.60 (11.0)1.1770.311
 Depression score42.71 (9.0)42.59 (8.2)41.36 (10.1)44.33 (10.3)0.8060.449
 Anxiety score41.90 (7.4)41.81 (7.2)41.32 (7.8)42.73 (7.8)0.2820.755
 Hostility score45.20 (8.7)45.06 (7.9)45.11 (11.0)45.73 (8.8)0.0700.933
 Phobia score44.11 (7.5)43.61 (6.1)45.04 (10.9)44.83 (7.6)0.5650.570
 Paranoid score43.64 (8.6)43.07 (7.4)44.61 (11.7)44.57 (9.1)0.5550.575
 Psychosis score42.72 (7.4)41.98 (5.5)43.43 (11.0)44.43 (8.6)1.4060.248
 General symptom index score46.72 (42.0)45.40 (36.7)44.96 (54.6)54.47 (44.9)0.6690.514
Skindex-29
 Total score57.72 (62.1)56.31 (61.0)50.37 (65.3)69.11 (63.0)0.7240.487
 Symptom score19.85 (20.6)19.11 (21.0)17.63 (21.6)24.27 (18.1)0.9140.403
 Function score13.91 (19.7)12.96 (18.6)13.99 (22.3)16.88 (20.7)0.4520.638
 Emotion score23.97 (26.0)24.25 (26.0)18.75 (23.4)27.96 (28.3)0.9230.400

Note: Unless otherwise indicated, data are expressed as mean (standard deviation).

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; BDD, body dysmorphic disorder; SCL-90-R, Symptom Checklist 90-Revised.

Participant Characteristics by Stratified Dermatological Diagnoses (N = 154) Note: Unless otherwise indicated, data are expressed as mean (standard deviation). Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; BDD, body dysmorphic disorder; SCL-90-R, Symptom Checklist 90-Revised.

Association Between BDD and Psychiatric Symptoms

The BDDE-SR score was significantly associated with the SCL-90-R total and subscores after adjusting for all potential covariates (Table 2).
Table 2

Results of Multiple Linear Regression Analyses for Assessing the Relationship Between BDD-SR and SCL-90-R Scores in Dermatological Patients

B95% CIP
SCL-90-R total score
 Model 12.2451.585 to 2.906<0.001
 Model 22.2661.602 to 2.930<0.001
 Model 32.2491.563 to 2.935<0.001
SCL-90-R somatization score
 Model 10.1150.064 to 0.166<0.001
 Model 20.1190.068 to 0.170<0.001
 Model 30.1220.070 to 0.175<0.001
SCL-90-R obsessive-compulsive score
 Model 10.1830.126 to 0.241<0.001
 Model 20.1820.124 to 0.239<0.001
 Model 30.1810.122 to 0.241<0.001
SCL-90-R interpersonal sensitivity score
 Model 10.2000.141 to 0.260<0.001
 Model 20.2030.143 to 0.262<0.001
 Model 30.1930.133 to 0.254<0.001
SCL-90-R depression score
 Model 10.1930.138 to 0.248<0.001
 Model 20.1940.138 to 0.250<0.001
 Model 30.1910.133 to 0.248<0.001
SCL-90-R anxiety score
 Model 10.1210.073 to 0.169<0.001
 Model 20.1250.077 to 0.172<0.001
 Model 30.1320.083 to 0.181<0.001
SCL-90-R hostility score
 Model 10.1610.106 to 0.216<0.001
 Model 20.1600.105 to 0.215<0.001
 Model 30.1560.100 to 0.212<0.001
SCL-90-R phobia score
 Model 10.1200.071 to 0.169<0.001
 Model 20.1250.077 to 0.173<0.001
 Model 30.1280.078 to 0.178<0.001
SCL-90-R paranoid score
 Model 10.1460.092 to 0.200<0.001
 Model 20.1440.090 to 0.199<0.001
 Model 30.1390.083 to 0.196<0.001
SCL-90-R psychosis score
 Model 10.1260.079 to 0.174<0.001
 Model 20.1280.080 to 0.175<0.001
 Model 30.1250.075 to 0.174<0.001
SCL-90-R general symptom index score
 Model 10.8800.622 to 1.137<0.001
 Model 20.8870.629 to 1.146<0.001
 Model 30.8820.615 to 1.149<0.001

Note: Model 1 did not include any covariates, model 2 included age as covariate, and model 3 included all potential covariates, including age, body mass index, and dermatologic diagnosis.

Abbreviations: BDD-SR, Body Dysmorphic Disorder Examination-Self Report; SCL-90-R, Symptom Checklist 90-Revised; CI, confidence interval.

Results of Multiple Linear Regression Analyses for Assessing the Relationship Between BDD-SR and SCL-90-R Scores in Dermatological Patients Note: Model 1 did not include any covariates, model 2 included age as covariate, and model 3 included all potential covariates, including age, body mass index, and dermatologic diagnosis. Abbreviations: BDD-SR, Body Dysmorphic Disorder Examination-Self Report; SCL-90-R, Symptom Checklist 90-Revised; CI, confidence interval.

Association Between BDD and Quality of Life

The BDDE-SR score was significantly associated with the Skindex-29 total and subscores after adjusting for all potential covariates (Table 3).
Table 3

Results of Multiple Linear Regression Analyses for Assessing the Relationship Between BDD-SR Score and Skindex-29 Score in Dermatological Patients

B95% CIP
Skindex-29 total score
 Model 11.2490.866 to 1.631<0.001
 Model 21.2690.886 to 1.652<0.001
 Model 31.2780.883 to 1.673<0.001
Skindex-29 symptom score
 Model 10.3470.214 to 0.479<0.001
 Model 20.3520.219 to 0.485<0.001
 Model 30.3430.206 to 0.479<0.001
Skindex-29 function score
 Model 10.3850.265 to 0.506<0.001
 Model 20.3950.275 to 0.514<0.001
 Model 30.4030.279 to 0.527<0.001
Skindex-29 emotion score
 Model 10.5170.356 to 0.678<0.001
 Model 20.5220.361 to 0.684<0.001
 Model 30.5320.365 to 0.699<0.001

Note: Model 1 did not include any covariates, model 2 included age as covariate, and model 3 included all potential covariates, including age, body mass index, and dermatologic diagnosis.

Abbreviations: BDD-SR, Body Dysmorphic Disorder Examination-Self Report; CI, confidence interval.

Results of Multiple Linear Regression Analyses for Assessing the Relationship Between BDD-SR Score and Skindex-29 Score in Dermatological Patients Note: Model 1 did not include any covariates, model 2 included age as covariate, and model 3 included all potential covariates, including age, body mass index, and dermatologic diagnosis. Abbreviations: BDD-SR, Body Dysmorphic Disorder Examination-Self Report; CI, confidence interval.

Variables Contributing to BDD

The variables that contributed most to the BDDE-SR score were the SCL-90-R depression score and Skindex-29 emotion score (Table 4 and Figure 1).
Table 4

Results of Stepwise Multiple Linear Regression Analyses for Assessing Variables Contribute to BDD-SR Score in Dermatological Patients

BSE95% CIPR2
Model 10.251
 SCL-90-R depression score1.3240.1860.958 to 1.691<0.001
Model 20.321
 SCL-90-R depression score0.9280.2040.525 to 1.330<0.001
 Skindex-29 emotion score0.2790.0710.139 to 0.419<0.001

Abbreviations: BDD-SR, Body Dysmorphic Disorder Examination-Self Report; SCL-90-R, Symptom Checklist 90-Revised; CI, confidence interval.

Figure 1

Scatter plots of the relationships of the BDDE-SR score with (A) the SCL-90-R depression score and (B) Skindex-29 emotion score.

Results of Stepwise Multiple Linear Regression Analyses for Assessing Variables Contribute to BDD-SR Score in Dermatological Patients Abbreviations: BDD-SR, Body Dysmorphic Disorder Examination-Self Report; SCL-90-R, Symptom Checklist 90-Revised; CI, confidence interval. Scatter plots of the relationships of the BDDE-SR score with (A) the SCL-90-R depression score and (B) Skindex-29 emotion score.

Association Among BDD, Psychiatric Symptoms, and Quality of Life Stratified by Dermatological Diagnosis

The BDD-SR scores were highest in the unclassified dermatoses group, but neither the SCL-90-R nor Skindex-29 score were related to any dermatological diagnosis after adjusting for the covariates (Table 5 and Figure 2).
Table 5

Results of Multiple Linear Regression Analyses for Assessing the Relationship Between Stratified Dermatological Diagnoses and BDD-SR, SCL-90-R, or Skindex-29 Scores in Dermatological Patients

Stratified Dermatological Diagnoses
Inflammatory DermatosesIsolated LesionsUnclassified Dermatoses
B (95% CI)pB (95% CI)P
BDD-SR score
 Model 1Reference−0.519 (−10.610 to 9.571)0.91910.762 (0.812 to 20.713)0.034
 Model 2Reference1.901 (−8.765 to 12.567)0.72512.338 (2.152 to 22.524)0.018
 Model 3Reference1.490 (−9.097 to 12.078)0.78110.440 (0.134 to 20.745)0.047
SCL-90-R score
 Model 1Reference−8.453 (−55.612 to 38.707)0.72418.595 (−27.909 to 65.099)0.431
 Model 2Reference−10.173 (−60.331 to 39.985)0.68917.475 (−30.427 to 65.377)0.472
 Model 3Reference−12.029 (−61.863 to 37.805)0.6348.890 (−39.618 to 57.399)0.718
Skindex-29 score
 Model 1Reference−7.786 (−34.813 to 19.241)0.5709.612 (−17.039 to 36.263)0.477
 Model 2Reference−11.701 (−40.384 to 16.982)0.4217.063 (−20.330 to 34.456)0.611
 Model 3Reference−12.617 (−41.195 to 15.961)0.3842.827 (−24.991 to 30.644)0.841

Note: Model 1 did not include any covariates, model 2 included age as covariate, and model 3 included all potential covariates, including age, body mass index, and dermatologic diagnosis.

Abbreviations: BDD-SR, Body Dysmorphic Disorder Examination-Self Report; SCL-90-R, Symptom Checklist 90-Revised; CI, confidence interval.

Figure 2

Bar plots of the relationships of BDDE-SR score with stratified dermatological diagnoses.

Results of Multiple Linear Regression Analyses for Assessing the Relationship Between Stratified Dermatological Diagnoses and BDD-SR, SCL-90-R, or Skindex-29 Scores in Dermatological Patients Note: Model 1 did not include any covariates, model 2 included age as covariate, and model 3 included all potential covariates, including age, body mass index, and dermatologic diagnosis. Abbreviations: BDD-SR, Body Dysmorphic Disorder Examination-Self Report; SCL-90-R, Symptom Checklist 90-Revised; CI, confidence interval. Bar plots of the relationships of BDDE-SR score with stratified dermatological diagnoses.

Discussion

The results of this study showed that BDD was associated with psychiatric symptoms and low quality of life in adult females with a dermatological disease. Furthermore, BDD symptoms were more severe in the unclassified dermatoses group, but neither psychiatric symptoms nor a low quality of life was related to any dermatologic diagnosis. To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the relationships among BDD, global psychiatric symptoms, and quality of life via analyses stratified by dermatological diagnosis. Our findings were consistent with previous studies regarding the relationships of BDD with depression and quality of life.7,25 One study reported that participants with skin diseases had more severe BDD score and depression, while those with a skin disease and severe BDD had high depression scores.25 In another study, BDD was frequently accompanied by major depression, earlier-onset depression and longer-duration depressive episodes, and also tended to co-occur with atypical depression.26 Another study on the relationship between BDD and quality of life showed that the BDD severity was correlated with quality of life even after adjusting for the severity of depression.7 Within our unclassified dermatoses group, and particularly among the patients with hair-related concerns, BDDE-SR scores were higher than those of the inflammatory dermatoses group, although neither psychiatric symptoms nor the quality of life was related to any dermatological diagnosis. One study reported that the incidence of BDD was about 10 times higher in patients complaining of hair loss compared to general dermatology patients.27 That study emphasized that awareness of BDD and referral of selected patients to mental health professionals are crucial. Furthermore, many studies have reported that hair-related concern, and especially hair loss, is the most common BDD symptom.28–30 Among BDD patients receiving surgical and non-psychiatric medical treatment, treatment outcomes are rarely satisfactory (although they may be successful from a physician’s point of view) because the treatments do not alleviate BDD symptoms.31,32 In a survey of cosmetic surgeons, 84% reported that they had operated on BDD patients, but only 1% of the cases resulted in complete remission of symptoms.33 Moreover, 40% of the respondents stated that BDD patients had threatened them with legal action, and/or physically.33 These findings suggest assessment for BDD may be needed before surgical and non-psychiatric medical treatments are provided. The present study had several limitations. First, as this was a cross-sectional study, we could not make inferences regarding causality with respect to BDD symptoms, psychiatric symptoms, and quality of life. Further long-term follow-up studies are thus required. Second, this study was conducted in a dermatology clinic in South Korea, and the findings may not be generalizable to other clinical settings or countries. Last, we used self-report questionnaires for assessing BDD, psychiatric symptoms, and quality of life, rather than clinical diagnoses or interviews by psychiatrists. However, the Korean questionnaires used have high reliability and validity.

Conclusions

BDD symptoms were especially prominent in the unclassified dermatoses group and were highly related to psychiatric symptoms and low quality of life in our dermatological patients. Studies including psychiatric interviews to confirm the BDD diagnosis and symptoms will improve our understanding of BDD in dermatology patients.
  25 in total

1.  Rate of body dysmorphic disorder in dermatology patients.

Authors:  K A Phillips; R G Dufresne; C S Wilkel; C C Vittorio
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 11.527

2.  Body image dissatisfaction and body dysmorphic disorder in 100 cosmetic surgery patients.

Authors:  D B Sarwer; T A Wadden; M J Pertschuk; L A Whitaker
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  A critical appraisal of the quality of quality-of-life measurements.

Authors:  T M Gill; A R Feinstein
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994 Aug 24-31       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  Body dysmorphic disorder: a review of conceptualizations, assessment, and treatment strategies.

Authors:  M B Cororve; D H Gleaves
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2001-08

5.  Body dysmorphic disorder among dermatologic patients: Prevalence and clinical features.

Authors:  Luciana Archetti Conrado; Ana Gabriela Hounie; Juliana Belo Diniz; Victor Fossaluza; Albina Rodrigues Torres; Euripedes Constantino Miguel; Evandro Ararigboia Rivitti
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 11.527

6.  Frequency of body dysmorphic disorder among patients with complaints of hair loss.

Authors:  Seval Dogruk Kacar; Pinar Ozuguz; Erman Bagcioglu; Kerem Senol Coskun; Serap Polat; Semsettin Karaca; Omer Ozbulut
Journal:  Int J Dermatol       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 2.736

7.  Body dysmorphic disorder in university students with skin diseases compared with healthy controls.

Authors:  Yeşim Kaymak; Ender Taner; Işil Simşek
Journal:  Acta Derm Venereol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.437

8.  Quality of life for Korean patients with vitiligo: Skindex-29 and its correlation with clinical profiles.

Authors:  Do Young Kim; Jae Won Lee; Se Hee Whang; Yoon Kee Park; Seung-Kyung Hann; Yee Jin Shin
Journal:  J Dermatol       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 4.005

9.  Axis I comorbidity in body dysmorphic disorder.

Authors:  John Gunstad; Katharine A Phillips
Journal:  Compr Psychiatry       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.735

10.  Awareness and identification of body dysmorphic disorder by aesthetic surgeons: results of a survey of american society for aesthetic plastic surgery members.

Authors:  David B Sarwer
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.283

View more
  1 in total

1.  Body dysmorphic disorder, skin diseases and psychological morbidity: common and complex.

Authors:  Parker Magin; Katie Fisher
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 11.113

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.