Literature DB >> 3331042

Imipenem/cilastatin therapy for serious infections in neonates and infants.

D R Nalin1, C A Jacobsen.   

Abstract

Sixty-one hospitalized infants aged one day to six months were enrolled in an open, multicenter noncomparative clinical study of the efficacy and safety of imipenem/cilastatin. Patients weighing less than 1500 g (four males/ten females, Group 1) and those greater than or equal to 1500 g (31 males/16 females, Group 2) were analyzed separately. Total daily dose (divided into b.i.d. (27) or t.i.d. (34) regimens) ranged from 50 to 101.4 mg/kg given for 10.8 days (means, range 2 to 35 days) for Group 1 and 39.7 to 103 mg/kg given for 11.2 days (means, range 1 to 41 days) for Group 2. The investigators graded the intensity of signs and symptoms of infections as moderate or severe in 86 and 91% of patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively, and bacterial pathogens were isolated pretreatment in 43 and 32% of patients. Eighty-eight percent of all bacterial pathogens were susceptible to imipenem in vitro. The most commonly isolated pathogens were Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Patients who had confirmed bacterial infections and who did not receive concomitant antibiotics were considered evaluable for efficacy, including 6 (43%) in Group 1 and 15 (32%) in Group 2. Infection sites were (Group 1) respiratory (100%), and (Group 2) skin and skin structures (33%), urinary (11%), gastrointestinal (11%), septicemia alone (11%) and meningitis or respiratory (28% and 6% with sepsis, respectively). Safety analysis included all patients. Imipenem/cilastatin was well tolerated in 93% of Group 1 and 85% of Group 2 patients. Three patients' treatments were discontinued due to rash, oliguria or poor local tolerability. Three patients in Group 1 and four in Group 2 died; deaths were considered unrelated to imipenem/cilastatin. Results are as follows: (table; see text) In summary, 81% (17 of 21) of evaluable patients were clinically cured or improved, among whom 3 of 21 patients (14%) had serious clinical or laboratory adverse experiences which were considered possibly related to imipenem/cilastatin. These results are comparable to results reported with other single or multiple antibiotic regimens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3331042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Infect Dis Suppl        ISSN: 0300-8878


  4 in total

Review 1.  Neurotoxicity of carbapenem antibacterials.

Authors:  S R Norrby
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 2.  Imipenem/cilastatin: an update of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetics and therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of serious infections.

Authors:  J A Balfour; H M Bryson; R N Brogden
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Adverse events associated with meropenem versus imipenem/cilastatin therapy in a large retrospective cohort of hospitalized infants.

Authors:  Christoph P Hornik; Amy H Herring; Daniel K Benjamin; Edmund V Capparelli; Gregory L Kearns; John van den Anker; Michael Cohen-Wolkowiez; Reese H Clark; P Brian Smith
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.806

4.  A novel analytical method to assess the effect of imipenem/cilastatin on liver function laboratory indexes in Chinese underage inpatients: Probability distribution curve.

Authors:  Le Zou; Fanqi Meng; Weici Wang; Qianqian Ye; Lin Hu; Taoming Li; Tao Yin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.