Monique B Nilsson1, Jacqulyne Robichaux1, Matthew H Herynk1, Tina Cascone1, Xiuning Le1, Yasir Elamin1, Sonia Patel1, Fahao Zhang1, Li Xu1, Limei Hu1, Lixia Diao2, Li Shen2, Junqin He1, Xiaoxing Yu1, Petros Nikolinakos1, Pierre Saintigny3, Bingliang Fang4, Luc Girard5, Jing Wang2, John D Minna6, Ignacio I Wistuba7, John V Heymach8. 1. Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. 2. Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. 3. Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon, Centre Léon Bérard, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale 1052, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 5286, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Univ Lyon, Lyon, France. 4. Department of Thoracic and Cardio Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. 5. Hamon Center for Therapeutic Oncology Research, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Pharmacology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas. 6. Hamon Center for Therapeutic Oncology Research, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Pharmacology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas. 7. Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. 8. Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. Electronic address: jheymach@mdanderson.org.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The treatment of patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors in combination with EGFR inhibitors provides a greater benefit than EGFR inhibition alone, suggesting that EGFR mutation status may define a patient subgroup with greater benefit from VEGF blockade. The mechanisms driving this potentially enhanced VEGF dependence are unknown. METHODS: We analyzed the effect of EGFR inhibition on VEGF and HIF-1α in NSCLC models in vitro and in vivo. We determined the efficacy of VEGF inhibition in xenografts and analyzed the impact of acquired EGFR inhibitor resistance on VEGF and HIF-1α. RESULTS: NSCLC cells with EGFR-activating mutations exhibited altered regulation of VEGF compared with EGFR wild-type cells. In EGFR-mutant cells, EGFR, not hypoxia, was the dominant regulator of HIF-1α and VEGF. NSCLC tumor models bearing classical or exon 20 EGFR mutations were more sensitive to VEGF inhibition than EGFR wild-type tumors, and a combination of VEGF and EGFR inhibition delayed tumor progression. In models of acquired EGFR inhibitor resistance, whereas VEGF remained overexpressed, the hypoxia-independent expression of HIF-1α was delinked from EGFR signaling, and EGFR inhibition no longer diminished HIF-1α or VEGF expression. CONCLUSIONS: In EGFR-mutant NSCLC, EGFR signaling is the dominant regulator of HIF-1α and VEGF in a hypoxia-independent manner, hijacking an important cellular response regulating tumor aggressiveness. Cells with acquired EGFR inhibitor resistance retained elevated expression of HIF-1α and VEGF, and the pathways were no longer EGFR-regulated. This supports VEGF targeting in EGFR-mutant tumors in the EGFR inhibitor-naive and refractory settings.
INTRODUCTION: The treatment of patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors in combination with EGFR inhibitors provides a greater benefit than EGFR inhibition alone, suggesting that EGFR mutation status may define a patient subgroup with greater benefit from VEGF blockade. The mechanisms driving this potentially enhanced VEGF dependence are unknown. METHODS: We analyzed the effect of EGFR inhibition on VEGF and HIF-1α in NSCLC models in vitro and in vivo. We determined the efficacy of VEGF inhibition in xenografts and analyzed the impact of acquired EGFR inhibitor resistance on VEGF and HIF-1α. RESULTS: NSCLC cells with EGFR-activating mutations exhibited altered regulation of VEGF compared with EGFR wild-type cells. In EGFR-mutant cells, EGFR, not hypoxia, was the dominant regulator of HIF-1α and VEGF. NSCLC tumor models bearing classical or exon 20 EGFR mutations were more sensitive to VEGF inhibition than EGFR wild-type tumors, and a combination of VEGF and EGFR inhibition delayed tumor progression. In models of acquired EGFR inhibitor resistance, whereas VEGF remained overexpressed, the hypoxia-independent expression of HIF-1α was delinked from EGFR signaling, and EGFR inhibition no longer diminished HIF-1α or VEGF expression. CONCLUSIONS: In EGFR-mutant NSCLC, EGFR signaling is the dominant regulator of HIF-1α and VEGF in a hypoxia-independent manner, hijacking an important cellular response regulating tumor aggressiveness. Cells with acquired EGFR inhibitor resistance retained elevated expression of HIF-1α and VEGF, and the pathways were no longer EGFR-regulated. This supports VEGF targeting in EGFR-mutant tumors in the EGFR inhibitor-naive and refractory settings.
Authors: Susumu Kobayashi; Titus J Boggon; Tajhal Dayaram; Pasi A Jänne; Olivier Kocher; Matthew Meyerson; Bruce E Johnson; Michael J Eck; Daniel G Tenen; Balázs Halmos Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-02-24 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jacqulyne P Robichaux; Yasir Y Elamin; Zhi Tan; Brett W Carter; Shuxing Zhang; Shengwu Liu; Shuai Li; Ting Chen; Alissa Poteete; Adriana Estrada-Bernal; Anh T Le; Anna Truini; Monique B Nilsson; Huiying Sun; Emily Roarty; Sarah B Goldberg; Julie R Brahmer; Mehmet Altan; Charles Lu; Vassiliki Papadimitrakopoulou; Katerina Politi; Robert C Doebele; Kwok-Kin Wong; John V Heymach Journal: Nat Med Date: 2018-04-23 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Matthew H Herynk; Oliver Stoeltzing; Niels Reinmuth; Nila U Parikh; Roger Abounader; John Laterra; Robert Radinsky; Lee M Ellis; Gary E Gallick Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2003-06-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Lauren Averett Byers; Banibrata Sen; Babita Saigal; Lixia Diao; Jing Wang; Meera Nanjundan; Tina Cascone; Gordon B Mills; John V Heymach; Faye M Johnson Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2009-10-27 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Xiuning Le; Sonam Puri; Marcelo V Negrao; Monique B Nilsson; Jacqulyne Robichaux; Theresa Boyle; J Kevin Hicks; Katherine L Lovinger; Emily Roarty; Waree Rinsurongkawong; Ming Tang; Huiying Sun; Yasir Elamin; Lara C Lacerda; Jeff Lewis; Jack A Roth; Stephen G Swisher; J Jack Lee; William N William; Bonnie S Glisson; Jianjun Zhang; Vassiliki A Papadimitrakopoulou; Jhanelle E Gray; John V Heymach Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2018-09-18 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Kazuhiko Nakagawa; Edward B Garon; Ling Gao; Sophie Callies; Annamaria Zimmermann; Richard Walgren; Carla Visseren-Grul; Martin Reck Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2022-07-16 Impact factor: 3.288