Karen B Lasater1, Douglas M Sloane2, Matthew D McHugh3, Jeannie P Cimiotti4, Kathryn A Riman3, Brendan Martin5, Maryann Alexander5, Linda H Aiken3. 1. Center for Health Outcomes and Policy Research, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. Electronic address: karenbl@nursing.upenn.edu. 2. Center for Health Outcomes and Policy Research, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. 3. Center for Health Outcomes and Policy Research, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. 4. Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, GA. 5. National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Chicago, IL.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite nurses' responsibilities in recognition and treatment of sepsis, little evidence documents whether patient-to-nurse staffing ratios are associated with clinical outcomes for patients with sepsis. METHODS: Using linked data sources from 2017 including MEDPAR patient claims, Hospital Compare, American Hospital Association, and a large survey of nurses, we estimate the effect of hospital patient-to-nurse staffing ratios and adherence to the Early Management Bundle for patients with Severe Sepsis/Septic Shock SEP-1 sepsis bundles on patients' odds of in-hospital and 60-day mortality, readmission, and length of stay. Logistic regression is used to estimate mortality and readmission, while zero-truncated negative binomial models are used for length of stay. RESULTS: Each additional patient per nurse is associated with 12% higher odds of in-hospital mortality, 7% higher odds of 60-day mortality, 7% higher odds of 60-day readmission, and longer lengths of stay, even after accounting for patient and hospital covariates including hospital adherence to SEP-1 bundles. Adherence to SEP-1 bundles is associated with lower in-hospital mortality and shorter lengths of stay; however, the effects are markedly smaller than those observed for staffing. DISCUSSION: Improving hospital nurse staffing over and above implementing sepsis bundles holds promise for significant improvements in sepsis patient outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Despite nurses' responsibilities in recognition and treatment of sepsis, little evidence documents whether patient-to-nurse staffing ratios are associated with clinical outcomes for patients with sepsis. METHODS: Using linked data sources from 2017 including MEDPAR patient claims, Hospital Compare, American Hospital Association, and a large survey of nurses, we estimate the effect of hospital patient-to-nurse staffing ratios and adherence to the Early Management Bundle for patients with Severe Sepsis/Septic Shock SEP-1 sepsis bundles on patients' odds of in-hospital and 60-day mortality, readmission, and length of stay. Logistic regression is used to estimate mortality and readmission, while zero-truncated negative binomial models are used for length of stay. RESULTS: Each additional patient per nurse is associated with 12% higher odds of in-hospital mortality, 7% higher odds of 60-day mortality, 7% higher odds of 60-day readmission, and longer lengths of stay, even after accounting for patient and hospital covariates including hospital adherence to SEP-1 bundles. Adherence to SEP-1 bundles is associated with lower in-hospital mortality and shorter lengths of stay; however, the effects are markedly smaller than those observed for staffing. DISCUSSION: Improving hospital nurse staffing over and above implementing sepsis bundles holds promise for significant improvements in sepsis patient outcomes.
Authors: Linda H Aiken; Douglas M Sloane; Hilary Barnes; Jeannie P Cimiotti; Olga F Jarrín; Matthew D McHugh Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Linda H Aiken; Jeannie P Cimiotti; Douglas M Sloane; Herbert L Smith; Linda Flynn; Donna F Neff Journal: J Nurs Adm Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 1.737
Authors: Mitchell M Levy; Andrew Rhodes; Gary S Phillips; Sean R Townsend; Christa A Schorr; Richard Beale; Tiffany Osborn; Stanley Lemeshow; Jean-Daniel Chiche; Antonio Artigas; R Phillip Dellinger Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2014-10-01 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Linda H Aiken; Douglas M Sloane; Luk Bruyneel; Koen Van den Heede; Peter Griffiths; Reinhard Busse; Marianna Diomidous; Juha Kinnunen; Maria Kózka; Emmanuel Lesaffre; Matthew D McHugh; M T Moreno-Casbas; Anne Marie Rafferty; Rene Schwendimann; P Anne Scott; Carol Tishelman; Theo van Achterberg; Walter Sermeus Journal: Lancet Date: 2014-02-26 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Andrew Rhodes; Gary Phillips; Richard Beale; Maurizio Cecconi; Jean Daniel Chiche; Daniel De Backer; Jigeeshu Divatia; Bin Du; Laura Evans; Ricard Ferrer; Massimo Girardis; Despoina Koulenti; Flavia Machado; Steven Q Simpson; Cheng Cheng Tan; Xavier Wittebole; Mitchell Levy Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2015-06-25 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Shira G Winter; Ann P Bartel; Pamela B de Cordova; Jack Needleman; Susan K Schmitt; Patricia W Stone; Ciaran S Phibbs Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2021-09-02 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Jeannie P Cimiotti; Edmund R Becker; Yin Li; Douglas M Sloane; Scott K Fridkin; Anna Beth West; Linda H Aiken Journal: JAMA Health Forum Date: 2022-05-27
Authors: Matthew D McHugh; Linda H Aiken; Douglas M Sloane; Carol Windsor; Clint Douglas; Patsy Yates Journal: Lancet Date: 2021-05-11 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Karen B Lasater; Linda H Aiken; Douglas M Sloane; Rachel French; Colleen V Anusiewicz; Brendan Martin; Kyrani Reneau; Maryann Alexander; Matthew D McHugh Journal: Med Care Date: 2021-05-01 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Karen B Lasater; Linda H Aiken; Douglas Sloane; Rachel French; Brendan Martin; Maryann Alexander; Matthew D McHugh Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-12-08 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Andrew M Dierkes; Linda H Aiken; Douglas M Sloane; Jeannie P Cimiotti; Kathryn A Riman; Matthew D McHugh Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-03-22 Impact factor: 2.692