PURPOSE: We compared the ability of ophthalmologists to identify neovascularization (NV) in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy using swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography (SS-OCTA) and fluorescein angiography (FA). DESIGN: Retrospective study comparing diagnostic instruments. METHODS: Eyes with proliferative diabetic retinopathy or severe nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy and a high suspicion of NV based on clinical examination were imaged using SS-OCTA and FA at the same visit. Two separate grading sets consisting of scrambled, anonymized SS-OCTA and FA images were created. The ground truth for presence of NV was established by consensus of 2 graders with OCTA experience who did not participate in the subsequent assessment of NV in this study. The 2 anonymized image sets were graded for presence or absence of NV by 12 other graders that included 2 residents, 6 vitreoretinal fellows, and 4 vitreoretinal attending physicians. The percentage of correct grading of NV using SS-OCTA and FA was assessed for each grader and across grader training levels. RESULTS: Forty-seven eyes from 24 patients were included in this study. Overall, the mean percentage of correct NV grading was 87.8% using SS-OCTA with B-scans and 86.2% using FA (P = .92). Assessing each grader individually, there was no statistically significant asymmetry in correct grading using SS-OCTA and FA. CONCLUSIONS: Ophthalmologists across training levels were able to identify diabetic NV with equal accuracy using SS-OCTA and FA. Based on these results, SS-OCTA may be an appropriate standalone modality for diagnosing diabetic NV.
PURPOSE: We compared the ability of ophthalmologists to identify neovascularization (NV) in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy using swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography (SS-OCTA) and fluorescein angiography (FA). DESIGN: Retrospective study comparing diagnostic instruments. METHODS: Eyes with proliferative diabetic retinopathy or severe nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy and a high suspicion of NV based on clinical examination were imaged using SS-OCTA and FA at the same visit. Two separate grading sets consisting of scrambled, anonymized SS-OCTA and FA images were created. The ground truth for presence of NV was established by consensus of 2 graders with OCTA experience who did not participate in the subsequent assessment of NV in this study. The 2 anonymized image sets were graded for presence or absence of NV by 12 other graders that included 2 residents, 6 vitreoretinal fellows, and 4 vitreoretinal attending physicians. The percentage of correct grading of NV using SS-OCTA and FA was assessed for each grader and across grader training levels. RESULTS: Forty-seven eyes from 24 patients were included in this study. Overall, the mean percentage of correct NV grading was 87.8% using SS-OCTA with B-scans and 86.2% using FA (P = .92). Assessing each grader individually, there was no statistically significant asymmetry in correct grading using SS-OCTA and FA. CONCLUSIONS: Ophthalmologists across training levels were able to identify diabetic NV with equal accuracy using SS-OCTA and FA. Based on these results, SS-OCTA may be an appropriate standalone modality for diagnosing diabetic NV.
Authors: Francesco Pichi; Scott D Smith; Emad B Abboud; Piergiorgio Neri; Elizabeth Woodstock; Steven Hay; Emily Levine; Caroline R Baumal Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2020-05-30 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: Jonathan F Russell; Harry W Flynn; Jayanth Sridhar; Justin H Townsend; Yingying Shi; Kenneth C Fan; Nathan L Scott; John W Hinkle; Cancan Lyu; Giovanni Gregori; Stephen R Russell; Philip J Rosenfeld Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2019-06-10 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Jonathan F Russell; Yingying Shi; John W Hinkle; Nathan L Scott; Kenneth C Fan; Cancan Lyu; Giovanni Gregori; Philip J Rosenfeld Journal: Ophthalmol Retina Date: 2018-11-24
Authors: Xinzhi Zhang; Jinan B Saaddine; Chiu-Fang Chou; Mary Frances Cotch; Yiling J Cheng; Linda S Geiss; Edward W Gregg; Ann L Albright; Barbara E K Klein; Ronald Klein Journal: JAMA Date: 2010-08-11 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Ying Cui; Ying Zhu; Jay C Wang; Yifan Lu; Rebecca Zeng; Raviv Katz; Filippos Vingopoulos; Rongrong Le; Inês Laíns; David M Wu; Dean Eliott; Demetrios G Vavvas; Deeba Husain; Joan W Miller; Leo A Kim; John B Miller Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2020-06-26 Impact factor: 5.908
Authors: Mohamed Ashraf; Jerry D Cavallerano; Jennifer K Sun; Paolo S Silva; Lloyd Paul Aiello Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2021-07-27 Impact factor: 4.964