| Literature DB >> 33309801 |
Hannah Franklin1, Benjamin E Clarke1, Rickie Patani2.
Abstract
Both astrocytes and microglia fulfil homeostatic and immune functions in the healthy CNS. Dysfunction of these cell types have been implicated in the pathomechanisms of several neurodegenerative diseases. Understanding the cellular autonomy and early pathological changes in these cell types may inform drug screening and therapy development. While animal models and post-mortem tissue have been invaluable in understanding disease processes, the advent of human in vitro models provides a unique insight into disease biology as a manipulable model system obtained directly from patients. Here, we discuss the different human in vitro models of astrocytes and microglia and outline the phenotypes that have been recapitulated in these systems.Entities:
Keywords: Astrocyte; Human iPSC; In vitro; Microglia; Neurodegenerative disease
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33309801 PMCID: PMC8052192 DOI: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2020.101973
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Prog Neurobiol ISSN: 0301-0082 Impact factor: 11.685
Summary of different human in vitro astrocyte protocols.
| Citation Reference | Summary |
|---|---|
| Immature astrocytes specifiable to the forebrain or spinal cord with FGF8 or RA, respectively, from hiPSCs using a 180-day protocol. Progenitors expanded with EGF + FGF2 for >150 days and then terminally differentiated with CNTF for 7 days. Astrocytes elicited electrophysiological responses to glutamate, propagated calcium waves upon mechanical stimulation, performed glutamate uptake and promoted synapse formation of co-cultured neurons. | |
| Human ES cell derived astrocytes obtained through a combination of BMP-mediated Smad and LIF-mediated JAK-STAT signalling. Neuroprotective properties of astrocyte conditioned media after exposure of human ES cell derived neurons to oxidative stress through glutathione-dependent and independent mechanisms. | |
| Astrocytes from | |
| Fibroblast derived astrocytes from | |
| Purification of astrocytes from fetal, juvenile and adult brains | |
| iPSCs from VCP mutant fibroblasts. Astrocytes generated in monoculture throughout - FGF used to expand and BMP4 and LIF used to terminally differentiate. | |
| Patterning 3D brain spheroids from hiPSCs to dorsal or ventral forebrain fate for up to 590 days. Astrocytes isolated by immunopanning with anti-HepaCAM antibodies perform phagocytic function, promote synapse formation and calcium signalling of co-cultured neurons. | |
| Expression of NFIA and SOX9 speeds up iPSC derived astrocyte generation which display functional attributes including promoting neurite outgrowth, calcium waves after mechanical stimulation and glutamate uptake. |
Advantages and disadvantages of human in vitro astrocyte models.
| Model | Strengths | Limitations |
|---|---|---|
| hiPSC | High purity | Expensive |
| Ability to self-renew | Time consuming | |
| Developmental model | ||
| ESCs | Same as hiPSCs | Same as hiPSCs plus ethical concerns |
| Transdifferentiated fibroblasts | Preserved age of donor | Limited supply |
| Faster than stem cell-based protocols | Reliant on expression of known factors | |
| Currently reliant on serum affecting reactivity | ||
| Immunopanned primary astrocytes | Ability to study cells exposed to | Limited supply |
| Can obtain from adult donors | ||
| Immortalised cell line | Fast | Karyotype abnormalities |
| Ability to self-renew | Abnormal proliferative state | |
| Currently reliant on serum affecting reactivity |
Summary of different human in vitro microglia protocols.
| Citation Reference | Summary |
|---|---|
| Primary monocytes cultured with M-CSF, GM-CSF, NGF and CCL2 acquire a ramified morphology and lower levels of CD45, CD14, HLA-DR, CD11b and CD11c. | |
| Primary monocytes converted to microglia-like cells with incubation of GM-CSF and IL-34 to a more ramified morphology. | |
| Microglia-like cells expressing TMEM119, from hESCs and hiPSCs. EBs cultured on murine embryonic fibroblast feeders before differentiation with M-CSF and IL-34. Can co-culture in 3D with neurons and astrocytes and they respond to LPS with cytokine secretion. | |
| Initially hiPSCs cultured in 5% oxygen conditions during haematopoiesis, then M-CSF, IL-34 and TGF-β followed by maturation with CD200 and CX3CL1 and then FACS for CD43. Microglia-like cells exhibit cytokine secretion, cell migration, responses of calcium and phagocytosis. | |
| Microglia-like cells isolated by FACS for CD14 and CX3CR1. Microglia-like cells express IBA1, CD11c, TMEM119, P2RY12, CD11b and CX3CR1. Release cytokines after LPS/IFNγ treatment, phagocytose and are calcium responsive after ADP treatment. | |
| MYB-independent hiPSC derived microglia are motile and phagocytotic when co-cultured with iPSC derived cortical neurons and secrete cytokines upon treatment with LPS. | |
| hiPSCs differentiated to microglia-like cells with GM-CSF, M-CSF, and IL-3 on astrocyte monolayers before being MACS sorted for CD11b/CD39. Express HLA-DR, CD45, TREM-2 and CX3CR1 but are negative for CD86, CD206, CD200R and CD80. Phagocytose and secrete TNF-α after LPS treatment. | |
| Updated simplified Abud et al., protocol without the need for 5% oxygen or cell sorting. |
Advantages and disadvantages of human in vitro microglia models.
| Model | Strengths | Limitations |
|---|---|---|
| hiPSC | High purity | Expensive |
| Ability to self-renew | Time consuming | |
| Developmental model | ||
| Primary macrophages | Can obtain from adult donors | Limited supply |
| Different ontogeny | ||
| Immortalised cell line | Fast | Karyotype abnormalities |
| Ability to self-renew | Abnormal proliferative state | |
| Currently reliant on serum affecting reactivity |
Fig. 1Pathomechanisms of AD in human in vitro astrocytes and microglia.
Fig. 2Pathomechanisms of PD in human in vitro astrocytes and microglia.
Fig. 3Pathomechanisms of HD in human in vitro astrocytes and microglia.
Fig. 4Pathomechanisms of ALS/FTD in human in vitro astrocytes and microglia.