Literature DB >> 33309463

Summary of recommendations and key points of the consensus of Spanish scientific societies (SEPAR, SEMICYUC, SEMES; SECIP, SENEO, SEDAR, SENP) on the use of non-invasive ventilation and high-flow oxygen therapy with nasal cannulas in adult, pediatric, and neonatal patients with severe acute respiratory failure.

M Luján1, Ó Peñuelas2, C Cinesi Gómez3, A García-Salido4, J Moreno Hernando5, A Romero Berrocal6, I Gutiérrez Ibarluzea7, J F Masa Jiménez8, A Mas9, J M Carratalá Perales10, M Gaboli11, A Concheiro Guisán12, J García Fernández13, J Escámez14, J Parrilla Parrilla15, E Farrero Muñoz16, M González17, S B Heili-Frades18, M Á Sánchez Quiroga19, G Rialp Cervera20, G Hernández21, A Sánchez Torres22, R Uña23, C F Ortolà24, M Ferrer Monreal25, C Egea Santaolalla26.   

Abstract

Non-invasive respiratory support (NIRS) in adult, pediatric, and neonatal patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) comprises two treatment modalities, non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) and high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy. However, experts from different specialties disagree on the benefit of these techniques in different clinical settings. The objective of this consensus was to develop a series of good clinical practice recommendations for the application of non-invasive support in patients with ARF, endorsed by all scientific societies involved in the management of adult and pediatric/neonatal patients with ARF. To this end, the different societies involved were contacted, and they in turn appointed a group of 26 professionals with sufficient experience in the use of these techniques. Three face-to-face meetings were held to agree on recommendations (up to a total of 71) based on a literature review and the latest evidence associated with 3 categories: indications, monitoring and follow-up of NIRS. Finally, the experts from each scientific society involved voted telematically on each of the recommendations. To classify the degree of agreement, an analogue classification system was chosen that was easy and intuitive to use and that clearly stated whether the each NIRS intervention should be applied, could be applied, or should not be applied.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier España, S.L.U. y SEMICYUC. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute respiratory failure; Consenso; Consensus; High-flow therapy with nasal cannulas; Insuficiencia respiratoria aguda; Non-invasive ventilation; Recomendaciones; Recommendations; Terapia de alto flujo con cánulas nasales; Ventilación no invasiva

Year:  2020        PMID: 33309463     DOI: 10.1016/j.medin.2020.08.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Intensiva (Engl Ed)        ISSN: 2173-5727


  2 in total

1.  A proposed lung ultrasound and phenotypic algorithm for the care of COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory failure.

Authors:  André Y Denault; Stéphane Delisle; David Canty; Alistair Royse; Colin Royse; Ximena Cid Serra; Caroline E Gebhard; Étienne J Couture; Martin Girard; Yiorgos Alexandros Cavayas; Nicolas Peschanski; Stéphan Langevin; Paul Ouellet
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 6.713

2.  What is the most adequate non-invasive oxygen support for acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure due to COVID-19?

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Frat; Arnaud W Thille; François Arrivé; Manel Lujan; Jordi Rello
Journal:  Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med       Date:  2021-06-19       Impact factor: 4.132

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.