Andrea J Lobene1, Elizabeth R Stremke2, George P McCabe3, Sharon M Moe4, Ranjani N Moorthi4, Kathleen M Hill Gallant5. 1. Department of Nutrition Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN; Department of Kinesiology and Applied Physiology, University of Delaware, Newark, DE. Electronic address: alobene@udel.edu. 2. Department of Nutrition Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN; Division of Epidemiology & Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN. 3. Department of Statistics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN. 4. Department of Medicine/Division of Nephrology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN. 5. Department of Nutrition Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN; Department of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the agreement between estimated 24-hour urinary sodium excretion (e24hUNa) and estimated 24-hour urinary potassium excretion (e24hUK), calculated from a spot urine sample using several available equations and actual sodium and potassium intake from a controlled diet in both healthy participants and those with chronic kidney disease (CKD). DESIGN AND METHODS: This study is a secondary analysis of a controlled feeding study in CKD patients matched to healthy controls. Participants (n = 16) consumed the controlled diet, which provided ∼2400 mg Na/day and ∼3000 mg K/day, for 8 days. On days 7 and 8, participants consumed all meals and collected all urine in an inpatient research setting, and they were discharged on day 9. The day 7 morning spot urine sample was used to calculate e24hUNa and e24hUK, which was compared with known sodium and potassium intake, respectively. RESULTS: Average e24hUNa from the INTERSALT and Tanaka-Na equations were higher than actual sodium intake by 373 mg and 559 mg, respectively, though the differences were not significant. e24hUNa from the Nerbass-SALTED equation in CKD participants was significantly higher than actual sodium intake by ∼2000 mg (P < .001), though e24hUNa from the Nerbass-RRID equation was not different from intake. e24hUK from the Tanaka-K equation was significantly lower than actual potassium intake (P < .001). For both e24hUNa and e24hUK for all participants, agreement with actual intake was poor, and e24hUNa and e24hUK were not correlated with actual sodium or potassium intake, respectively. CONCLUSION: e24hUNa and e24hUK are poor indicators of true sodium and potassium intake, respectively, in both healthy and CKD participants. Findings should be confirmed in larger sample sizes with varying levels of dietary sodium and potassium.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the agreement between estimated 24-hour urinary sodium excretion (e24hUNa) and estimated 24-hour urinary potassium excretion (e24hUK), calculated from a spot urine sample using several available equations and actual sodium and potassium intake from a controlled diet in both healthy participants and those with chronic kidney disease (CKD). DESIGN AND METHODS: This study is a secondary analysis of a controlled feeding study in CKD patients matched to healthy controls. Participants (n = 16) consumed the controlled diet, which provided ∼2400 mg Na/day and ∼3000 mg K/day, for 8 days. On days 7 and 8, participants consumed all meals and collected all urine in an inpatient research setting, and they were discharged on day 9. The day 7 morning spot urine sample was used to calculate e24hUNa and e24hUK, which was compared with known sodium and potassium intake, respectively. RESULTS: Average e24hUNa from the INTERSALT and Tanaka-Na equations were higher than actual sodium intake by 373 mg and 559 mg, respectively, though the differences were not significant. e24hUNa from the Nerbass-SALTED equation in CKD participants was significantly higher than actual sodium intake by ∼2000 mg (P < .001), though e24hUNa from the Nerbass-RRID equation was not different from intake. e24hUK from the Tanaka-K equation was significantly lower than actual potassium intake (P < .001). For both e24hUNa and e24hUK for all participants, agreement with actual intake was poor, and e24hUNa and e24hUK were not correlated with actual sodium or potassium intake, respectively. CONCLUSION: e24hUNa and e24hUK are poor indicators of true sodium and potassium intake, respectively, in both healthy and CKD participants. Findings should be confirmed in larger sample sizes with varying levels of dietary sodium and potassium.
Authors: Feng J He; Norm R C Campbell; Yuan Ma; Graham A MacGregor; Mary E Cogswell; Nancy R Cook Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2018-12-01 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Mary E Cogswell; Chia-Yih Wang; Te-Ching Chen; Christine M Pfeiffer; Paul Elliott; Cathleen D Gillespie; Alicia L Carriquiry; Christopher T Sempos; Kiang Liu; Cria G Perrine; Christine A Swanson; Kathleen L Caldwell; Catherine M Loria Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2013-09-18 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Emma J McMahon; Judith D Bauer; Carmel M Hawley; Nicole M Isbel; Michael Stowasser; David W Johnson; Katrina L Campbell Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2013-11-07 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Emelia J Benjamin; Paul Muntner; Alvaro Alonso; Marcio S Bittencourt; Clifton W Callaway; April P Carson; Alanna M Chamberlain; Alexander R Chang; Susan Cheng; Sandeep R Das; Francesca N Delling; Luc Djousse; Mitchell S V Elkind; Jane F Ferguson; Myriam Fornage; Lori Chaffin Jordan; Sadiya S Khan; Brett M Kissela; Kristen L Knutson; Tak W Kwan; Daniel T Lackland; Tené T Lewis; Judith H Lichtman; Chris T Longenecker; Matthew Shane Loop; Pamela L Lutsey; Seth S Martin; Kunihiro Matsushita; Andrew E Moran; Michael E Mussolino; Martin O'Flaherty; Ambarish Pandey; Amanda M Perak; Wayne D Rosamond; Gregory A Roth; Uchechukwu K A Sampson; Gary M Satou; Emily B Schroeder; Svati H Shah; Nicole L Spartano; Andrew Stokes; David L Tirschwell; Connie W Tsao; Mintu P Turakhia; Lisa B VanWagner; John T Wilkins; Sally S Wong; Salim S Virani Journal: Circulation Date: 2019-03-05 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Norm R C Campbell; Feng J He; Monique Tan; Francesco P Cappuccio; Bruce Neal; Mark Woodward; Mary E Cogswell; Rachael McLean; Joanne Arcand; Graham MacGregor; Paul Whelton; Antti Jula; Mary R L'Abbe; Laura K Cobb; Daniel T Lackland Journal: J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) Date: 2019-05-14 Impact factor: 3.738
Authors: Carlo Garofalo; Silvio Borrelli; Michele Provenzano; Toni De Stefano; Carlo Vita; Paolo Chiodini; Roberto Minutolo; Luca De Nicola; Giuseppe Conte Journal: Nutrients Date: 2018-06-06 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Lesley F Tinker; Ying Huang; Karen C Johnson; Laura D Carbone; Linda Snetselaar; Linda Van Horn; JoAnn E Manson; Simin Liu; Yasmin Mossavar-Rahmani; Ross L Prentice; Johanna W Lampe; Marian L Neuhouser Journal: Curr Dev Nutr Date: 2021-10-12