Literature DB >> 33309388

Repeated cryopreservation process impairs embryo implantation potential but does not affect neonatal outcomes.

Meng Wang1, Jinghang Jiang2, Qingsong Xi3, Dan Li1, Xinling Ren1, Zhou Li1, Lixia Zhu4, Lei Jin5.   

Abstract

RESEARCH QUESTION: Does repeated cryopreservation process affect embryo implantation potential and neonatal outcomes of human embryos?
DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study was conducted in the Reproductive Medicine Centre, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology. All assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles were carried out between January 2014 and December 2018. Preferentially matched participants were divided into three groups according to the times of embryo cryopreservation: the fresh group (n = 249), the cryopreservation group (n = 244) and the re-cryopreservation group (n = 216). Embryo implantation rate, live birth rate, miscarriage rate and neonatal complication rate were compared among these three groups.
RESULTS: The embryo implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate in the re-cryopreservation group were significantly lower, and the miscarriage rate also slightly increased. Logistic regression analysis indicated that embryos with repeated cryopreservation and lower trophectoderm scores were at higher risk of embryo implantation failure in single embryo transfer cycles (OR 1.79 and 1.56, respectively). No significant differences were observed in gender, gestational age, birthweight, neonatal abnormality and neonatal complications among the groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate the adverse effect of repeated cryopreservation on embryo implantation potential. The study offers embryologists and reproductive clinicians a warning of detrimental role of repeated cryopreservation. If unnecessary, it is strongly recommended to avoid repeated practice of vitrification and warming on embryos.
Copyright © 2020 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Human embryos; Implantation potential; Neonatal complication; Repeated cryopreservation; Vitrification

Year:  2020        PMID: 33309388     DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.11.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


  3 in total

1.  Accumulation of Cleavage-Stage Embryos by Vitrification may Compromise Embryonic Developmental Potential in Preimplantation Genetic Testing.

Authors:  Shun Xiong; Xiangwei Hao; Yang Gao; Lihong Wu; Junxia Liu; Jiang Wang; Jiahong Zhu; Jingyu Li; Dongyun Liu; Wei Han; Guoning Huang
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 3.060

2.  Melatonin Improves Quality of Repeated-Poor and Frozen-Thawed Embryos in Human, a Prospective Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Zhongjian Bao; Guangdong Li; Rongxiang Wang; Songguo Xue; Yong Zeng; Shoulong Deng
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 6.055

3.  Live birth rate following a euploid blastocyst transfer is not affected by double vitrification and warming at cleavage or blastocyst stage.

Authors:  Efstathios Theodorou; Benjamin P Jones; Daniella F Cardenas Armas; Carleen Heath; Paul Serhal; Jara Ben-Nagi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-02-26       Impact factor: 3.357

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.