| Literature DB >> 33309331 |
Hannah S Wauchope1, Tatsuya Amano2, Jonas Geldmann3, Alison Johnston4, Benno I Simmons5, William J Sutherland6, Julia P G Jones7.
Abstract
Humanity's impact on the environment is increasing, as are strategies to conserve biodiversity, but a lack of understanding about how interventions affect ecological and conservation outcomes hampers decision-making. Time series are often used to assess impacts, but ecologists tend to compare average values from before to after an impact; overlooking the potential for the intervention to elicit a change in trend. Without methods that allow for a range of responses, erroneous conclusions can be drawn, especially for large, multi-time-series datasets, which are increasingly available. Drawing on literature in other disciplines and pioneering work in ecology, we present a standardised framework to robustly assesses how interventions, like natural disasters or conservation policies, affect ecological time series.Keywords: before-after-control-intervention; causal inference; counterfactual; difference in differences; interrupted time series; longitudinal data
Year: 2020 PMID: 33309331 DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2020.11.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Trends Ecol Evol ISSN: 0169-5347 Impact factor: 17.712